Genesis 6 brings us to the 3rd “generations”: 6:9 the records of the generations of Noah: Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his time; Noah walked with God. Noah 10 Noah became the father of three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.”
First issue to be discussed:Who were the “sons of God” and who were the “daughters of men” that they married. The Book of Enoch said that the sons of God were angels who came down, married earthly women and bore a race of giants, the Nephilim. Here’s AI about the book of Enoch:
The Book of Enoch states that a group of 200 angels called “Watchers” lusted after human women, descended to Earth, and took them as wives. This illicit sexual union defiled the women, introduced forbidden magic, and produced a race of violent giant offspring known as the Nephilim.
The Descent of the Watchers
Two hundred angels swore an oath on Mount Hermon to leave heaven and find human wives.
Led by figures like Semiaza and Azazel, they coupled with the women and defiled themselves.
Corruption and Forbidden Knowledge
The angels taught women charms, sorcery, making weapons coosmetics.
This spread immense wickedness and lawlessness across the earth.
The Offspring (The Nephilim)
The women gave birth to giants 300 cubits tall (450 feet).
These giants consumed the food of mankind and
eventually turned on humans and animals to devour them and drink their blood.
Divine Judgment
God condemned the rebellious angels, having them bound and imprisoned in the depths of the earth until the final judgment.
He also sent a great flood to cleanse the earth of the destruction caused by the giants.
- Not in Standard Bibles: The text is not part of the standard Hebrew Bible or mainstream Christian Old/New Testaments.It was not written by Enoch who did not die but was carried to heaven. It was probably written between 3rd century BC and 1st century AD. The fact that the book of Enoch says that the women gave birth to giants 450 feet tall makes it pretty unbelievable and mythological.
- Ethiopian Canon: It is accepted as canonical scripture only within the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church and Eritrean Orthodox Church.
- Historical Influence: Early Jewish and Christian writers read the book widely, and the New Testament book of Jude directly quotes a line from 1 Enoch. Fragments of it were also discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Could angels come down to earth and have sex with earthly women? Jesus said in Matthew 22:30 that angels do not marry but it doesn’t say they could not marry. I guess anything is possible but I think that the “sons of God” were the descendants of the line of Seth who worshipped the one true God. Genesis 4:26 To Seth, to him also a son was born; and he called his name Enosh. Then men began to call upon the name of the Lord.” They began to marry the ungodly descendants of Cain which led to widespread moral decay. That produced a race of giants (Nephilim), a race of “men of renown”, or at least a race of powerful tyrannical rulers.The 10 spies reported seeing Nephilim. Numbers 13:33 There also we saw the Nephilim (the sons of Anak are part of the Nephilim); and we became like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.” So it does seem that the Nephilim were giants like Goliath. If the sons of God were the descendants of Seth and not angels, why would their marriage to the daughter descendants of Cain produce giants? That might make us lean toward the sons of God being angels but I just don’t believe angels came down and had sex with women. Also these sons of God married the daughters of men. That implies that they were on earth long enough to establish marriages instead of just one-time sexual relations and then head back to heaven. So, I can’t explain how the descendants of Seth marrying the daughters of men created a race of giants. It is interesting that “Gotquestions.org”, which is usually pretty conservative, says that the sons of God were fallen angels! It comments: “Early Jewish interpreters and apocryphal and pseudepigraphal writings are unanimous in holding the view that fallen angels are the sons of God mentioned in Genesis 6.” Of course, he is including the book of Enoch in that comment which is not accepted as authentic by most Christian scholars.
That brings up another question that bothers me. Did the flood wipe out all the giants on the earth? It seems for certain that the flood wiped out all the Nephilim (whoever they were) on thee land wiped out by the flood. But then after the flood there are still giants like Goliath (and his brothers) and the Nephilim that the spies saw in Canaan. Where did they come from if giants over the entire earth were wiped out by the flood? Apparently there were giants on places like Easter Island who created and moved statues weighing 12-14 tons and 13 feet tall (some much heavier and taller). Hod did giants come to live on Easter Island. There were only 8 people surviving the flood (Noah, his wife, his 3 sons and their wives). How could giants come from one of those 8 people? Some have suggested that one of Noah’s daughter in laws had the genes to produce giants but that is pure speculation. There is another theory that might sound like heresy but here it is! Is it possible that Noah’s flood only wiped out the people in the Mesopotamian valley of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers and not all people all over the earth? But didn’t God say that He was going to blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land? Yes, He did, but that language might not be strictly speaking of all mankind on all the continents of the earth. AI discusses this possibility:
Yes, biblical scholars and linguists argue that phrases like “all the earth” and “all the people” in Noah’s flood can be interpreted as a local or regional flood rather than a planet-wide cataclysm.
Arguments for Local Language
- Hebrew Word Meanings: The Hebrew word erets translated as “earth” or “land,” frequently refers to a specific local territory, country, or region (like the “land” of Egypt) rather than the physical globe.
- Universal Idioms (Hyperbole): Biblical writers often use universal terms like kol (“all” or “whole”) as hyperbole or naked-eye observation to mean “all within the writer’s known horizon or experience”. For instance, Exodus 9:25 says “all the trees of the field were broken” by hail in Egypt, yet Pharaoh’s crops elsewhere survived. Or the gospel would be preached to the whole world by 70 AD (Matthew 24:14), which it was according to Paul (Colossians 1:23) the “gospel that you have heard, which was proclaimed in all creation under heaven,” The apostles did preach the gospel to the whole Roman Empire, but not to every person on earth as the language might imply.
- Contextual Clues: Scholars pointing to a regional event note that Genesis 8:5 mentions mountaintops becoming visible while the surrounding “earth” remained flooded, which fits a regional Mesopotamian basin view better than a globe-spanning ocean.
Arguments Against Local Language
- Repetition and Emphasis: Traditional interpreters argue that Genesis repeatedly uses comprehensive modifiers—such as “all the high mountains under the whole heaven”—to deliberately rule out a mere local event. But counter: does that language necessitate all the mountains over the whole earth?
- The Logic of the Ark: Critics of the local theory ask why God would command Noah to spend decades building a massive ark and gathering regional/flying animals instead of simply telling him to migrate to a safe region. But counter: the flood could have been local but large enough to kill animals and people in the Mesopotamian Valley and requiring that Noah build such a large ark. If animals had to come from all over the earth, then that is possible but difficult to see animals coming from all the continents of earth coming even if pangea is still the case when the flood came.
- New Testament and Covenant: Passages like the rainbow promise or Jesus and Peter’s comparisons treat the event as a total, universal judgment, which opponents argue is undermined by recurring local floods. But counter: The judgement Peter predicted in 2 Peter 3: 7 But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men” is actually only predicting the judgment on the Jews in 70 AD and a spiritual new heavens and earth (not literal) that was fulfilled in the new Messianic system. Peter’s language also sounds like he is predicting universal destruction of the heavens and earth but he is only referring to a local judgment. So when he refers to the Noah destruction of the heavens and earth and ungodly men, he could also be referring to a local Noah flood. Counter on the rainbow point: The rainbow is indeed seen all across the earth and it is a promise not to ever do a flood as extensive (even if it was just a local flood) Mlike the Noah flood (even though there have been many local floods) but that doesn’t necessarily mean the Noah flood was universal.
Where does Pangea come into all this? Pangea was a giant supercontinent that joined all of Earth’s landmasses together into one single land piece. That does appear to be true when you look at a map of how the continents could seem to fit together. Genesis 1 suggests that the land on earth was one piece: Genesis 1:9 Then God said, “Let the waters below the heavens be gathered into one place, and let the dry land appear”; and it was so. 10 God called the dry land earth, and the gathering of the waters He called seas; and God saw that it was good.” If Pangea is true, then when did the continents separate? Old earth advocates say they separated one inch at a time over 100’s of millions of years, but I am a young earth (a 6,000 year old earth: see the blog article on Genesis 1-5) so I can’t accept that. I think the continents separated at the flood. The flood could have been local but large enough to separate them b/c it says the all the fountains of the great deep burst open (Genesis 7:11) so that could have produced the shift in the tectonic plates that would separate the continents. That would explain why scientists found identical plant and animal fossils on continents that are now separated by wide oceans.and matching rock layers and mountain ranges appear across different sides of the Atlantic Ocean. That would also explain how animals and people (if the flood was a local flood killing only the people in the Mesopotamian Valley) came to be on all the continents. If it was a local flood, there were still people and animals on the continents as they quickly were separated and you would have people and animals in all the continents not destroyed by the flood. Universal flood advocates say that after the flood, people and animals migrated to the separated continents by drifting across on rafts or land bridges across temporary shallow seas, but I find that hard to believe. Noah’s flood was around 2350 BC. The tower of Babel was about 100 years after the flood when those surviving the flood and their descendants were not separated across the earth. Even a very conservative estimate is that early Mayan civilizations were present around 2,000 BC. Think about all the people and animals just in South America coming about by drifting on rafts across the ocean within a few hundred years after the Noah flood. I find that implausible. It makes more sense to me that the people and animals living when the continents separated were simpy carried to their new continent locations and continued to thrive and reproduce. After all, it appears that God was angry with a specific group of the descendants of Seth and descendants of Cain and not angry with people in South America (or other distant locations) So why would God destroy all the people in Pangea with a flood? BTW if the Noah flood was local but extensive, and if the fountains of the deep opened up causing the continents to separate, that would have produced massive flooding over the continents as they separated. That might explain how young earth advocates find signs of floods all over the earth. But there could be flooding all over the earth at the time of Noah’s local flood without destroying all men and animals on all the earth. That could also explain why there are so many flood myths of different cultures. There are about 300 flood myths all over the earth (like the Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh which dates to around 2,000 BD). Many of them have details similar to Noah’s local flood. If continents separated at Noah’s flood, then people on all the continents would have some knowledge perhaps of the Noah local flood and then added their own myths and gods to the Noah flood story. Likewise with the people at the tower of Babel who separated across Europe, Asia, and Africa after the tower of Babel. Those people certainly knew about Noah’s flood but were rebellious and God confused their languages which caused them to migrate to Europe, Asia, and Africa. They simply added their own myths and gods to the original Noah flood story. Why do we believe that the Noah flood story is not just a myth like the other 300 flood stories? Many Bible believers would simply say, “B/c Moses in Genesis said it happened.” But I point to the fact that Jesus said that it happened. Matthew 24:37 For the coming of the Son of Man will be just like the days of Noah. 38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, 39 and they did not understand until the flood came and took them all away; so will the coming of the Son of Man be.” Jesus was the Son of God and we can trust what he says. He was also with the Father all through the Old Testament history, so He was actually watching the flood as it happened. The Holy Spirit inspired apostle Peter also said the Noah flood really happened. BTW Jesus is predicting his coming in judgment on the Jews in 70 AD which was only a local judgment and not a judgment of all the people on all the continents. 1 Peter 3:18 For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit; 19 in which also He went and made proclamation to the spirits now in prison, 20 who once were disobedient, when the patience of God kept waiting in the days of Noah, during the construction of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through the water.” 2 Peter 2:5 and did not spare the ancient world, but preserved Noah, a preacher of righteousness, with seven others, when He brought a flood upon the world of the ungodly.”
But what about the dinosaraurs? Were there dinosaurs on the ark? Scientists tell us that dinosarus died out 60 million years ago and modern man only appeared 300,000 years ago. But the Bible says that God created both man and land animals on day 6, so according to the Bible dinosaurs and man co-existed and lived the same time. There is plenty of evidence of that. Many drawings made by ancient peoples that clearly show dinosaurs that they saw. There are many legends about dinosaurs over the past 2,000 years that appear to be factua firsthand sightings of dinosaurs. So yes there were dinosaurs on the ark. The book of Job (Job 40) even mentions 2 dinosaurs, Behemoth and Leviathon, that God created. So what happened to the dinosaurs? Scientists say a comet somehow wiped out all the dinosaurs but not all the other animals but that is wild speculation. They just became extinct like 2,500 other species of animals have become extinct over the past 2,000 years.


Most of the Genesis 6-10 account of the flood is easy to understand so I won’t review it all. A few points. Critics refute that all the animals could not fit on the ark, but the ark was massive (as the Ark Museum in Kentucky shows) and had the space of 550 railway box cars. Plus Noah only took “kinds” of each animal, so they could indeed all fit on the ark. They were on the ark about one year. God allowed man to eat meat after the flood (before the flood they only ate vegetables). Capital punishment was demanded by God for murder. He makes no distinction between premeditated murder and manslaughter like Moses did in the Law later. The rainbow is indeed a beautiful reminder that the flood did occur (whether universal or local). After they got off the ark, Noah planted a vineyard, got durnk, and got naked! Ham saw his father’s nakedness and told the brothers, but did nothing to remove the embarrassment of this incident. Shem and Japheth covered Noah’s nakedness. Strange story. What actually did Ham do that was so wrong? Did he mock his father and gossip about it to his brothers? Is there something more perverse to what he did as some suggest? It just seems that he “saw and told” and was guilty of disrespect. But what about Noah getting drunk? The man who saved the world got drunk and set a terrible example for his family. Some suggest that he was unfamiliar with the effects of alcohol, but shouldn’t he have realized the effects after drinking a few sips? Some suggest that he was suffering from post tramatic stress from years of building the ark and spending a year on the ark with all those animals! I guess we could understand that if that was the case! Also weird is that Noah didn’t accept any blame for getting drunk and naked. Instead he cursed, not Ham, but Ham’s son Canaan to be a servant to the descendants of Shem and Japheth. A lot of weird stories in the Bible!
Noah lived 350 years after the flood for a total of 950 years. He was 500 when he had his 3 sons and about 600 when the flood began. I close with a few slides that might interest you.



I know that’s a lot and I left a lot unanswered questions and gave some speculation. I hope it didn’t cause more confusion than necessary. Keep reading. Catching up on Genesis.





























