Tag: christianity

THE HOPE OF ISRAEL

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

While preaching to the Jews who came to his house arrest living quarters during the 2 years in his first imprisonment in Rome, Paul spoke of the “hope of Israel” in Acts 28:20 For this reason, therefore, I requested to see you and to speak with you, since I am wearing this chain for the sake of the hope of Israel.”

What was the “hope of Israel” that Paul kept mentioning? “The “hope of Israel” refers to the expectation and belief in a future restoration and salvation, often associated with the Messiah, the Anointed One, who would bring peace and righteousness to the world. This hope encompasses various aspects, including the return of Israel to the Promised Land, the establishment of God’s kingdom, and the resurrection of the dead.” (AI) This expectation was based on promises made in the Old Testament. In Paul’s trial before Festus and King Agrippa, Paul said: Acts 26:6 And now I am standing trial for the hope of the promise made by God to our fathers; 7 the promise to which our twelve tribes hope to attain, as they earnestly serve God night and day. For this hope, O king, I am being accused by Jews.” It did include the resurrection of the dead. Acts 24:14 “But I confess this to you, that in accordance with the Way, which they call a sect, I do serve the God of our fathers, believing everything that is in accordance with the Law and is written in the Prophets; 15 having a hope in God, which these men cherish themselves, that there is ‘about to be’ (mello which always means about to be in the NT) be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked.” Daniel predicted that this resurrection of the dead would occur at the end of the Jewish Age in 70 AD. Daniel 12:2 And many of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will awake, these to everlasting life, but the others to disgrace and everlasting contempt.” That chapter 12 in Daniel is definitely referring to the destruction of the temple in 70 AD b/c 12:11 refers to the “abomination of desolation” of the temple which Jesus said would occur within the generation of those he was talking to in Matthew 24:15,34 just as Daniel predicted.

So the expectation of the Jews, based on OT promises, was a literal restoration of the Jewish kingdom brought about by the Messiah (the Anointed One), a return to the holy land, and victory over their Roman rulers. That is still the way non Christian Jews and many evangelical Christians interpret the “hope of Israel” today. They see the statehood given to Israel by the UN in 1948 as partial fulfillment of God’s promises to Israel and they expect the rest of the fulfillment in the near future.

I do not agree with this literal interpretation of the hope of Israel. I believe all the Messianic kingdom promises were made only to the Jewish remnant in the first century who would believe in Jesus as the Messiah and become Jewish Christians. I believe the promises were fulfilled in a spiritual, not literal, way. Some OT Messianic prophecies were to be fulfilled literally, such as the prediction in Micah 5:2 that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem. It is clear that was a literal fulfillment and a one time only fulfillment in the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem. But there are many OT prophecies that were fulfilled in a spiritual way. For example, Malachi 4:5 predicts that Elijah would come before the great and terrible day of the Lord (70 AD judgement on the Jews). Jesus said that was fulfilled in John the Baptist, not Elijah literally coming just before Jesus came. Malachi’s prediction was fulfilled in a spiritual way, using figurative language, not literally fulfilled.

So how can we tell if OT Messianic prophecies were to be fulfilled literally or spiritually. It can get tricky but here are my guidelines. It should be obvious that predictions about Jesus’ birth place, suffering and death (Isaiah 53), etc. were to be fulfilled literal, just as they sound. They were given to confirm that Jesus was the Messiah so they had to be fulfilled literally and not with figurative language.

But what about the Messianic promises made to Israel in the OT? My guideline is this. If a literal fulfillment contradicts New Testament passages, then it must have been meant to be fulfilled spiritually using figurative language. For example, Daniel predicted that the kingdom of God, with Christ reigning as king forever, would be established in the days of the Roman Empire. Jesus came proclaiming that kingdom of God was “at hand” and would be established within the lifetime of some of those he was talking to. So, unless Jesus is a false prophet, then the kingdom of God that was established in the first century as Jesus predicted could not be fulfilled literally in a physical kingdom like that of David in the OT. Instead, it was fulfilled spiritually in the establishment of the church, a spiritual kingdom. Many say that Jesus meant to establish a physical kingdom on earth but delayed that until his 2nd coming which they say is still in our future, but that would contradict what Jesus predicted.

The Messianic promises to Israel were just like that example. We go to Romans 9-11 to show that to be the case. Romans 9:6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; 7 nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but: “through Isaac your descendants shall be named.” 8 That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants.” (NASB) Paul answers a possible objection that I hear made today: did God not fulfill His Messianic promises made to Israel in the OT? In other words, “did the word of God in the OT promises fail to come to pass”? Paul argues that those promises did come to pass but that they were only intended for the Jewish remnant who would accept Jesus as the Messiah and become Christians in the church. He clearly says that the promies were not given to the whole nation of Israel, fleshly Israel, even if they rejected Jesus as the Messiah. As a matter of fact, he clearly taught that the Jews who rejected Jesus as the Messiah would be judged by God when He sent the Romans to destroy Jerusalem and the temple in 70 AD.

So, if God did fulfill all the Messianic prophecies made to Israel by saving the remnant of Jews who accepted Jesus as the Messiah, then, as Paul argue, the word of God did not fail. But those remant Jewish Christians did not get the holy land and the kingdom of Israel was not restored to the power of the days of David. So it is apparent that the predictions of being restored to the land were fulfilled in a spiritual figurative way, just as the kingdom was.

Paul goes on to say, Romans 9:27 Isaiah cries out concerning Israel, “Though the number of the sons of Israel may be like the sand of the sea, only the remnant will be saved.” It was only the Jewish remnant that accepted Jesus that would be saved and not the rest of the unbelieving nation of Israel. The restoration of Israel and receiving of the land promises was not fulfilled in 1948. That was fulfilled in the first century as Paul argued, but it was fulfilled in a spiritual figurative way. The restored land was probably fufilled spiritually in the NT church kingdom being safely in the hands of God Himself.

Paul deals with another possible objection: so did God reject His people? Romans 11:I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? Far from it! For I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God has not rejected His people whom He foreknew. Or do you not know what the Scripture says in the passage about Elijah, how he pleads with God against Israel? 3 “Lord, they have killed Your prophets, they have torn down Your altars, and I alone am left, and they are seeking my life.” 4 But what is the divine response to him? “I have kept for Myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.” 5 In the same way then, there has also come to be at the present time a remnant according to God’s gracious choice.” (NASB) It is obvious that God did reject the Jews who did not accept Jesus as the Messiah. He sent the Romans in 70 AD to kill one million of them and carry off another 200,000 into captivity. So He did rejected the unbelieving Jews. But He had not rejected true Israel, which would be the remnant of the Jewish nation who would accept Jesus as the Messiah. Matthew 21:43 Jesus said that the kingdom was going to be taken away from the Jews and given to a spiritual nation and kingdom, the church.

Then Paul says, Romans 11:25 For I do not want you, brothers and sisters, to be uninformed of this mystery—so that you will not be wise in your own estimation—that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; 26 and so all Israel will be saved.” If in Romans 9:27 the “remnant who would be saved” was the Jews who accepted Jesus as the Messiah, then the “all Israel” in Romans 11:26 must also mean the remnan Jews who accepted Jesus as the Messiah. Most all the Jews rejected Jesus as the Messiah initially. But Paul is pedicting that some of those who rejected Jesus will see the Gentiles being saved, become envious, and later decide to accept Jesus. Paul said this partial hardening would happen until the fullness of the Gentiles had come in. That would all come to pass at Jesus’ 2nd coming in 70 AD. By then, the entire Jewish remnant who accepted Jesus would be gathered from across the whole Roman Empire and the. process of grafting in the Gentile believers would be complete (i.e. the “fulness of the Gentiles”).

So, I don’t believe there are any OT or NT prophetic predictions to be fulfilled after 70 AD. The plan is finished by 70 AD and salvation is available from then on for anyone who wants to be saved. I believe that Romans 9-11 should carry a lot of weight in. deciding what the “hope of Israel” was/is. The hope of Israel was that any Jew who would accept Jesus as the Messiah would be saved and blessed with spiritual, not physical, blessings. Many Messianic Jews did exactly that and formed the first church. Many Messianic Jews are doing that today also. Any ethnic Jew can realize the hope of Israel if they will accept Jesus as Messiah, Son of God, and Savior.

JOHN HUSS: BURNED AT THE STAKE

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

John Huss was born in 1369 in Bohemia (in the Czech Republic), the son of a peasant. He was influenced by John Wycliffe and became a pastor. People from common people to the wife of the king followed him and a movement of true Christianity broke out in Bohemia. The pope threatened him but he continued to preach. He taught the priesthood of believers (every Christian is a priest; not just the Roman Catholic church priests). He preached against the corruption in the Roman church and against the selling of indulgences. He was brought before the cardinals for a hearing and then cast into a sewage-filled dungeon. Eventually, his books were burned and he was burned at the stake in 1415 at the age of 46. After his execution, his followers, Hussites, engaged in the Hussite Wars between 1420 and 1431, defeating 5 papal crusades sent to wipe them out. The wars ended with a compromise with the Catholic church. Eventually most Hussites were absorbed into the Catholic church by the 17th century. One group of Hussites formed an independent church, the Unitas Fratrum (Unity of Brethren). The Moravian church emerged from the Unitas Fratrum. The Czechoslovak Hussite Church, is a recognized religious body today.  “Nearly six centuries later in 1999, Pope John Paul II expressed “deep regret for the cruel death inflicted” on Hus and added “deep sorrow” for Hus’s death and praised his “moral courage”. (Wikipedia)

I can’t imagine the horror of being burned at the stake. This method was employed for various reasons, including treason, heresy, and witchcraft, and served as a public spectacle of punishment. “Witches were burned at the stake during European witch trials, particularly between the 15th and 18th centuries, as punishment for heresy or witchcraft, which was often seen as a crime against both the church and the state. The punishment was a standard practice in many parts of Europe, with local authorities and church leaders overseeing the executions.” (AI) Joan of Arc was burned at the stake for heresy in 1431, although her conviction was later overturned. 

John Huss refused to recant his preaching at his trial which led to his execution. He said, “I am ready to die.” Would I recant my faith in Jesus if threatened with being burned at the stake? I hope not.

The Bible speaks of “dying to self”. Actually, your old sinful self dies in the eyes of God when you are buried with Christ in baptism and raised as a new self cleansed by the blood of Jesus. That old sinful self stays dead in God’s eyes unless you fall from grace. Colossians 3:3 ESV  “For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God.” me. Galatians 2:20 ESV / 104 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful

I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.”

But then we are told to continually “die to self”, to deny self, to crucify the flesh, meaning relinquishing selfish desires and priorities to follow Christ. That is a constant battle every day, the flesh vs the spirit. Your salvation doesn’t depend on you winning that battle over the flesh perfectly. Your salvation is due to the grace of God and the continual cleansing of the blood of Jesus. But a truly converted sinner will constantly try to die to self out of gratitude for what Jesus did for us.

Galatians 5:24-25 ESV “And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. If we live by the Spirit, let us also keep in step with the Spirit.” Ephesians 4:22 ESV “To put off your old self, which belongs to your former manner of life and is corrupt through deceitful desires.”

Some Christians are still being called upon to die for their faith like John Huss. In the U.S. we will probably never be faced with that, but we are faced with “dying to self” every day. Are you living for yourself and your own desires, or are you living for Christ to please His desires?


JOHN WYCLIFFE: MORNING STAR OF THE REFORMATION (1330-1384)

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

You probably have heard of John Wycliffe. You could easily argue that Peter Waldo should have that title “morning star of the reformation” one hundred years earlier, but John Wycliffe had more impact than Waldo. Waldo believed much the same as Wycliffe. Born in England, Wycliffe abhorred the corruption in the Roman Catholic church. He taught that Christ, not the pope, is the head of the church. He taught that the Scriptures, not the Catholic church papal decrees and tradition, are the sole authority for faith and practice. He taught that the Catholic church should excommunicate immoral clergymen and give away the church’s excessive wealth and property. He taught against the selling of indulgences and he rejected transubstantiation. He began voicing his teaching at Oxford University where he had taught for many years. He began writing pamphlets in English that a farmer or shopkeeper could read. The common people only had the Latin Vulgate, so Wycliffe translated or was responsible for translating the Bible into Middle English (a version now called the “Wycliffe Bible”) so the common man could read it and decide what it meant instead of relying on the priests. “Wycliffe’s followers were called Lollards because the name, derived from the Dutch word “lollaert” meaning “mumbler,” was used pejoratively by critics to describe their practice of reading scripture and making long prayers.” (AI) His preachers went throughout England carrying copies of his English translation. They were called “Poor Preachers” b/c they dressed in simple clothes and lived with the common people, unlike the Roman priests who lived apart from the people and dressed in clerical garb. He was finally expelled from Oxford and was persecuted by the Catholic church, but the church was afraid to kill him, fearing it. would cause an uprising. He never left the Catholic church; he even died of a fatal stroke while at Mass. But 17 years after his death, anyone preaching Wycliffe’s ideas was punished by death by the Catholic church. In 1415, thirty years after his death, a Catholic council ordered that his books be burned and that his remains be dug up and burned. His ashes were thrown into the River Swift.

We take it for granted that we have so many translations of the Bible into English so we can read it for ourselves and decide what we think it means. It is hard to imagine a time like in the 14th century when there were no Bibles in English. Since the 16th century, there have been around 250 translations into English alone (900 if you count revisions and partials)! The Catholic church actually did its own Douay-Rheims English version of the Bible in 1609, maybe partly as a result of the work of Wycliffe 200 years earlier. That version is older than the famous King James Version of 1611. Both versions used the Latin Vulgate as the main source. Wycliffe’s translation used the Latin Vulgate also.

The original Old Testament books were written in Hebrew mainly and the New Testament in Greek. We don’t have any of the original books of the Bible. Can we trust the English translations that we have? Yes we can. We have over 5,700 complete or partial manuscripts made or translations into other languages from which to come up with an accurate translation that we can trust. The New Testament sources go back to within 100 years of the original New Testament books in many papyri. When we compare the thousands of copies of the New Testament, they are 95 to 99% the same. The errors are typically small copyist errors. The Old Testament books were copied with extreme care for accuracy. The Dead Sea Scrolls (1948) show that the Old Testament was copied accurately over the centuries. For example, the complete copy of Isaiah called the “Great Isaiah Scroll” found in the DSS is 95% the same as the earliest Hebrew copy of Isaiah that we had, which was in 930 AD, over 1,000 years later than the Great Isaiah Scroll which was carbon dated as 125 BC. That shows that the book of Isaiah had been accurately copied for that 1,000 years and gives us confidence that the original book of Isaiah done in 800 BC was copied accurately over the centuries. There are at least portions of all the OT books except Esther in the DSS. So, yes you can trust a good English translation of the Bible. Be careful about paraphrases. There is a lot of debate about which English translation of the Bible is the most accurate. Jesus and the apostles quoted from the Septuagint, which is the translation of the Hebrew OT from Hebrew into Greek, done between the 3rd and 1st century BC. That shows that you can trust a good translation of the original languages even if you know it is not 100% accurate.

I hope this helps us appreciate our Bible translations. More importantly, I hope it encourages us to read and study those translations since we have been blessed with the Bible in our own English language.

PETER WALDO

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

Have you ever heard of Peter Waldo? He is the founder of the Waldensians. Born around 1140 AD in Lyons, France, he was a wealthy merchant who became disgusted with the corruption in the Roman Catholic church. He became convinced that the Scriptures, not the Pope or Catholic tradition, are the sole authority for Christians. The Catholics used the Latin Vulgate, which few could understand, and claimed that ordinary Christians would be corrupted if they read the Bible for themselves. He paid to have the Bible translated into the current French language. After reading what Jesus told the rich ruler to do, “to sell what he had and give to the poor”, he sold what he had and lived as a beggar preacher. His followers sold or gave away what they had: they came to be called the “Poor of Lyons”. He believed that the Bible should be preached, even by lay preachers, which was also condemned by the Catholic church. Waldo’s followers, the Waldensians, were persecuted by the Catholic church. The infamous Roman Catholic Inquisition was a special church court established in the 1200’s to inquire about and judge matters of “heresy”. The inquisition lead to fierce persecution of the Waldensians. They lost their property and many were burned at the stake. The Waldensians were numerous in Italy, France, and Switzerland, and then spread throughout Europe.

Here is a list of the doctrines of the Roman Catholic church that Waldo and the Waldensians rejected?

  • They rejected all claims to authority besides Scripture.
  • They rejected all mediators between God and man, except the man Christ Jesus (though Mary was venerated for quite a while).
  • They rejected the doctrine that only a priest could hear confession, and argued that all believers were qualified.
  • They rejected purgatory, and thus rejected indulgences and prayers for the dead.
  • They believed the only Scripture-sanctioned sacraments were baptism and communion.
  • They rejected the Church’s emphasis on fast and feast days and eating restrictions.
  • They rejected the priestly and monastic caste system.
  • They rejected the veneration of relics, pilgrimages, and the use of holy water.
  • They rejected the pope’s claim to authority over earthly rulers.
  • They eventually rejected the apostolic succession of the pope.

You can see why Peter Waldo was considered one of the forerunners of the Protestan Reformation movement of the 1600’s. That list of objection to Catholic doctrine was the same as that of the Protestant Reformation movement. Any Waldensians in the 1600’s eventually joined the Protestant Reformation.

So what do we learn from the story of Peter Waldo? We see how corrupt the Catholic church was. The church tortured and burned heretics. They wouldn’t let common people read the Bible in their language. It is hard for us to imagine that religious environment. We have had freedom of religion so long that we take it for granted. What if you lived back in the 12th century under the tyrannical power of the Catholci church? Would you have the courage to stand up to the church even if it cost you your life?

So, what do you believe? At our Christian school the board came up with a “statement of faith” that the school believed in and practices. It is basic Christian doctrines, similar to those of Peter Waldo. Such a statement of basic beliefs became even more needed as issues like homosexual marriages and gender identity arose in the current culture. In a way, the anti-Christian culture of today is something that we Christians have to stand up to just as Waldo stood up to the Catholic church.. If you proclaim basic fundamentalist Christian teaching on marriage, homosexuality, and. gender you will be mocked. If you stand up for the Bible as the sole authority for doctrines, you will be mocked. Maybe not tortured or burned at the stake, but you will be persecuted and mocked. I hope the example of Peter Waldo will inspired you to have the courage to stand up to today’s anti-Christian culture.

Wouldn’t it be great to talk to Peter Waldo? Maybe one day we can.

JOHN G. PATTON: MISSIONARY TO CANNIBALS

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

Do you have any idea where the New Hebrides islands are? They are in the South Pacific.

The New Hebrides, now known as Vanuatu, consists of roughly 80 islands in the South Pacific. These islands are situated northeast of New Caledonia and southeast of the Solomons. While there are 80-odd islands in total, not all of them are inhabited. Notice the islands of Tanna and Aniwa. They are at the heart of the post today concerning John G. Paton. Born in Scotland in 1824, John married Mary in April, 1858 and 14 days later sailed to the South Pacific and landed on the island of Tanna in November, 1858. They joined a missionary who had been working there for several years. Three months after their arrival, a son, Peter Robert Robson, was born on 12 February 1859. But just 19 days later, Mary died from tropical fever soon to be followed to the grave by the newly born Peter at 36 days of age. The natives on Tanna were cannibals. In 1839 two missionaries had been martyred and eaten by the cannibals in the South Pacific. “After Mary died, John spent nights sleeping on their grave to protect them from the local cannibals. The gravesite is still accessible to this day with a plaque marking the spot, erected in 1996.” (Wikipedia)

John continued alone for 4 years trying to convert the cannibals in spite of the danger he faced from the cannibals. 14 times he was attacked with a fever. He barely escaped the cannibals on many occasions. Later he returned to Scotland to raise money for the work in the New Hebrides and to encourage missionaries to go there. In 1865 he married again to Maggie and they went to another island in the New Hebrides, Aniwa, in 1866. The natives of Aniwa were cannibals also but they were more receptive than those in Tanna. “John learned the language and reduced it to writing. Maggie taught a class of about fifty women and girls who became experts at sewing, singing and plaiting hats, and reading. They trained the teachers, translated and printed and expounded the Scriptures, ministered to the sick and dying, dispensed medicines every day, taught them the use of tools, held worship services every Lord’s Day, built orphanages and took care of many orphans, and sent native teachers to all the villages to preach the gospel. Enduring many years of deprivation, danger from natives and disease, they continued with their work and after 15 years of patient ministry, the entire island of Aniwa professed Christianity. In 1899 Paton saw his Aniwa New Testament printed and the establishment of missionaries on twenty-five of the thirty islands of the New Hebrides.” (Wikipedia) Maggie died in 1905 and John died at the age of 82 in 1907. John spent almost 50 years mission work in Tanna and Aniwa. He was courageous and willing to put his life on the line to propagate the gospel of Jesus.

“In Christianity, an unreached people group refers to an ethnic group without an indigenous, self-propagating Christian church movement. It is estimated that of the 8.08 billion people alive in the world today, 3.42 billion of them live in unreached people groups with little or no access to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  For every $100,000 a Christian earns, only $107 on average will go to world missions. And roughly 1% of that money will support the 3.1 billion people who live in unreached people groups.” (AI)

I encourage you to pray over this map of unreached people groups worldwide. Churches spend about 75-80 % of the money they collect in contributions on buildings and staff. Churches collect about 75 billion per in contributions but only a small % of that money goes into mission work and a very, very small % of that money goes toward reaching the unreached people groups with the gospel. Fellow Christians, what are we doing? Where do you think Jesus would want all that money spent? Children dying all over the world b/c of unclean water. Families and children in refugee camps trying to escape local warring groups. Famine and flood relief needed. The Bible needs to be translated into all the languages of the world. “As of November 2024 the whole Bible has been translated into 756 languages, the New Testament has been translated into an additional 1,726 languages, and smaller portions of the Bible have been translated into 1,274 other languages. Thus, at least some portions of the Bible have been translated into 3,756 languages.” (AI) So the translations are there, we just need to print and distribute them to the world.

I hope you at least tithe (give a tenth). I hope you give that tithe to the many organizations that print Bibles, support missionaries, drill wells, provide food for the oppressed and needy worldwide.

MARY MOFFAT

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

This post honors missionary wives. Mary Moffat was the consummate (perfect or complete in every way) missionary wife of British missionary Robert Moffat. Robert was a gardener but his passion for mission work led him to Africa at the age of 21. Mary’s parents forbade her marriage to Robert, but finally consented and she joined in both in marriage and in his mission work in South Africa in 1816. They would spend 50 years as partners in Kuruman, South Africa trying to bring the Bechuana to Christ. She had come from a well to do family but adjusted to living in a hut with mud walls and floors, hauling water in every day. Living conditions were tough on Mary and Robert. Their “honeymoon” was spent on a 700 mile trip to Kuruman with all their belongings in an ox cart pulled by six spans of oxen that took 7 weeks (she described it as one long picnic). “For the Moffats there were long years of fruitlessness, of reducing an unwritten language, and of translating the Bible into that difficult tongue.  Other duties took time from the all-important task of evangelism:  planting, building, carrying, creating, butchering, salting, storing, sewing, cobbling, carpentering, blacksmithing, preaching, teaching, exhorting, pacifying, supporting, cleaning, feeding, doctoring, praying, writing, etc.” (from GFA missions) They constantly dealt with natives stealing their possessions. Robert made trips into the interior leaving Mary very fearful due to threats from warring chiefs. It was 7 long years before they made their first Christian convert. ” Robert was an independent individual given to moods, both visionary and of depression.  Mary was steady, disciplined, patient, and organized. She had a faith in the future that never wavered.  She was always ready to comfort and support Robert. They eventually served for over 52 years with only one furlough during that period of time.

Mary was Robert’s “beloved partner,” a true helpmeet.  Their goal was to see the Bechuana come to Christ, a church planted, and the Word of God available in the language of the people.  Their love for the national was one, and their arms and home were open to the nationals.  Mary was wife, mother, and true missionary.  She was a great encourager to Robert in the tedious task of learning the language and translating the Bible, which took many years of plodding word by word, verse by verse.  Robert was self-taught in Greek. They were truly one flesh, one mind, and with one purpose—all to the glory of God.  Africa became their home. 

There were times when Robert was very discouraged and depressed; but Mary, at his side as a true companion and a true partner in the work, saw him through these difficult times (Ephesians 5:31-33).  She was a woman of great faith.” (from GFA)

Their oldest daughter married David Livingstone but died of a fever during his trips through Africa. Some of their other children became missionaries. “She and Robert were credited with creating a family of “Moffats” who carried forward the mission work.” (from Wikipedia)

“By degrees, better conditions came. Once Mary Moffat wrote to friends at home for a communion service, because, as she said, she believed that native Christians would yet sit together at the Lord’s table in that land. That time came, and she wrote: “You can hardly conceive how I feel when I sit in the house of God surrounded with the natives. Though my situation may be despicable and mean in the eyes of the world, I feel that an honor has been conferred upon me which the kings of the earth could never have done for me. I am happy, remarkably happy, though my present habitation is a single room with a mud floor and a mud wall. Not only did a native Christian community grow up about them in Kuruman, but through the influence of the native Christians here and the teaching of Moffat on his missionary tours, groups of native Christians may now be found through all that region.” (Jessie Brown Pounds from wholesomewords.org)

Do you see why I called Mary Moffat the “consummate missionary wife”? No doubt her daily life was filled with things like gardening, cooking, cleaning, etc. but she did all that with one purpose in mind: to partner with her husband to spread the gospel to the Bechuana in Kuruman. I encourage you to think about all the duties and chores that you do every single day. You ladies cook, clean, take care of the kids, run errands, shop, maybe work outside the home, wash clothes, etc. You men go to work every day, deal with the stress of providing for the family, fight the traffic coming and going to work, fix things around the house, deal with issues with the kids, watch sports, plan for future financial and health well being for your family, etc. But, men or women, do you do everything with one purpose in mind: to honor God, to save your own children first and then to share the gospel with as many people as you come in contact with? Do you just go through life doing the stuff you have to do or do you do follow Colossians 3:17 “Whatever you do in word or deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks through Him to God the Father.”? Notice “whatever you do in word or deed”. That would include all the daily chores and duties that you do.

I am also blessed with a consummate missionary wife. We have partnered in mission work overseas, church work here in the U.S., and over 35 years of Christian education (which I considered to be mission work here in the U.S.). She has been, like Mary, steady, a great mother to our 3 children, a great role model to our 10 grandchildren, never complaining about whatever living conditions we had, always making the best of bad situations, encouraging to me when I get discouraged. When I felt like the Lord was calling us to a mission field overseas or locally in Christian education, she never questioned that calling but joined in. Like Robert, I often was off on my mission trips or duties in Christian education, leaving her to deal with the real issues of raising a family and she did so with great success. We are proud of the faith of our 3 children and the loving Christian homes they have established, and their faith was largely due to their mother’s prayers and faith passed on to them. She would pray every night with them, “God help ___, ___, and ___ grow up to be Christians and marry Christians” (long before they knew what either concept meant), and they did both!

Thanks to all consummate Christian wife partners in life. I can think of several more that I know well. How about you? Do you do all your daily duties and chores to honor God? I thought this was great from AI. “Making secular pursuits holy for God involves seeing all aspects of life, including work and everyday tasks, as opportunities to serve God and glorify him. This means approaching secular activities with diligence, honesty, and a sense of dedication, recognizing that even seemingly mundane tasks can be done for the glory of God.” Try that today as you go through the day. Make every thing you do holy. Think: “how can I make this mundane task become something holy to honor God?”

LOTTIE MOON

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

In my posts I try to gather info and pass it on to you. You can go to different sites and read the original sources that I gather from, but i hope my summaries make it simpler for you. Today, it’s Lottie Moon, missionary to China. Born in 1840, she went to China in 1873 at the age of 32 and spent 39 years there teaching women and girls and sharing the gospel in China. She was one of the first women to earn a master’s degree in the south. She never married (though engaged at one time) but instead dedicated her whole life to serving God. She spoke Latin, Greek, French, Italian, Spanish, and was fluent in reading Hebrew. Instead of pursuing a career in the U.S. she chose to devote her life to sharing the gospel in China. She adopted Chinese dress and customs and identified with the Chinese people. “She took a special interest in Chinese women, establishing schools for girls and working to free them from customs such as foot binding.” (AI) Lottie had several nicknames in China—foreign devil, foreign lady teacher, heavenly book visitor, and the cookie maker. (Lottie baked cookies to win the hearts of the children and families who were frightened of her.)” (AI) She was often persecuted by Chinese who hated foreigners. “Throughout her missionary career, Moon faced plague, famine, revolution, and war. The First Sino-Japanese War (1894), the Boxer Rebellion (1900) and the Chinese Nationalist uprising (which overthrew the Qing Dynasty in 1911) all profoundly affected mission work. Famine and disease took their toll as well.” (from Wikipedia)

She is famous for her letters to southern Baptist Christians begging them to come do mission work in China among the 472 million Chinese living at that time, or send missionaries, or support sending missionaries. She was a realist. She once wrote home to the Foreign Mission Board, “Please say to the [new] missionaries: they are coming to a life of hardship, responsibility and constant self-denial.” “Disease, turmoil and lack of co-workers threatened to undo Lottie’s work. But she gave herself completely to God, helping lay the foundation of what would become the modern Chinese church, one of the fastest-growing Christian movements in the world. Lottie Moon died at 72 — ill and in declining health after decades ministering to her beloved Chinese. But her legacy lives on. And today, when gifts aren’t growing as quickly as the number of workers God is calling to the field, her call for sacrificial giving rings with more urgency than ever.” (from the International Missions Board of the southern Baptist Church) There are now 1.4 billion Chinese. In 1918 the Women’s Missionary Union started the annual Lottie Moon Christmas Offering for international Missions. Lottie died in 1912. “In her final hours, she sang “Jesus Loves Me” with the missionary nurse who accompanied her. Lottie made one final gesture, pushing her fists together in the form of the Chinese greeting.” (AI) Due to declining health and sharing her food with starving Chinese, she weighed 50 pounds when she died. She was a feminist, promoting gender equality. She would have fit in quite well with the modern feminist movement!

I enjoyed learning more about Lottie Moon. I continue to be amazed at foreign missionaries like Lottie who suffered much to do life long mission work in foreign countries. My usual rant: the church in the U.S. should be sending and supporting missionaries to the unreached peoples groups around the world instead of spending 80% of the contributions on staff and buildings. Pray for all the missionaries abroad. In the messages to the 7 churches (Revelation 2,3), a warning is given several times to the churches to get back to their first love, to strengthen the things that remain, to repent of sin and worldliness, to oppose false teaching (like the lGBQT movement that has captured many churches), and to awake from lukewarm complacency. Those warnings would apply to many churches in the U.S.

MALACHI: THE LAST PROPHET

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

The book of the prophet Malachi was written around 430 BC. The entire history of the Old Testament is found in the first 17 books: Genesis through Esther. That history ends with the 3rd return of Judah from Babylonian captivity under Nehemiah to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. The rest of the 39 books of the OT are writings of David, Solomon, the 5 major prophets, the 12 minor prophets, and the booik of Job. But all these occur chronologically within the time frame of the first 17 books, Genesis through Esther. The only exception to this is the book of Malachi, which some think even Malachi was written just before the return of Nehemiah. Here is a great chart:

“Malachi means “my messenger”. He was a contemporary of Nehemiah. In the last 5 chapters of Nehemiah, the walls are rebuilt but the people are still committing sins that Nehemiah has to address. “None of the prophecies of the glorious kingdom to come have come to pass. Times were hard b/c of drought, famine, and blighted crops. These hardships have been met by sloth, indifference, and spiritual lethargy. The people had been in the land for almost a 100 years, but present circumstances made them apathetic. They doubted the love of God. Since the wicked prospered, they questioned whether there was any profit in walking penitently before God and obeying His commandments. Against such a background the book was written.” (Harper Study Bible intro to Malachi).

Malachi writes in question/answer form. Notice the 8 times that it says: “But or yet you say”.

  1. 1:2 “I have loved you,” says the Lord. But you say, “How have You loved us?” Malachi’s answer:God had shown his love for the descendants of Jacob (Israel) instead of Esau (the Edomites). The Jews would be blessed while the Edomites would be cursed.
  2. 1:6 “‘A son honors his father, and a servant his master. Then if I am a father, where is My honor? And if I am a master, where is My respect?’ says the Lord of armies to you, the priests who despise My name! But you say, ‘How have we despised Your name?’ Malachi’s answer: 1:7 You are presenting defiled food upon My altar.”
  3.  1:7b But you say, ‘How have we defiled You?’  Malachi’s answer: By the priests offering blind, sick, or lame animals as sacrifices on the altar of burnt offerings. Malachi then gives a scathing rebuke of the Levitical priests. They had a special covenant with God to instruct the people of the Law and to offer sacrifices, but they had become corrupt. Malachi then asks this follow up question: 2:10 Do we not all have one Father? Is it not one God who has created us? Why do we deal treacherously, each against his brother so as to profane the covenant of our fathers? ” Malachi answers his own question: The mistreating of one another among the Jews went back to the sin of taking foreign wives in some way. This could refer to the sin of some charging interest of fellow Jews as condemned by Nehemiah (Nehemiah 5), thus “dealing treacherously against each other”.
  4. 2:13 And this is another thing you do: you cover the altar of the Lord with tears, with weeping and sighing, because He no longer gives attention to the offering or accepts it with favor from your hand. 14 Yet you say, “For what reason?” (i.e. for what reason does God no longer accept our offerings?) Malachi’s answer: B/c of the practice of divorce among the people. God says, “I hate divorce.” Could that be part of the moral decline in the U.S. also? According to the American Psychological Association, approximately 40-50% of first marriages end in divorce. The divorce rate for second marriages is even higher, with approximately 60-67% of second marriages ending in divorce. The breakdown of the home is then passed on to future generations.
  5. 2:17 You have wearied the Lord with your words. Yet you say, “How have we wearied Him?” Malachi’s answer: B/c you say, “everyone who does evil is good in the sight of the Lord.” In other words, those who do evil are considered blessed by God with power and money. Malachi then says that in the distant future God will correct this falsehood by bringing His “messenger of the covenant (i.e. Jesus the messenger of the New Covenant” to judge the evil Jews in 70 AD in the destruction of the temple and of Jerusalem. The Jews took delight in the expectation of the coming of the Messiah, but they would find out that Jesus the Messiah would not only come to save the penitent Jews but also to judge and destroy the evil Jews in 70 AD. The remnant of the Jews who accepted Jesus as the Messiah would then be purified and able to offer acceptable offerings to God. They would become new covenant priests offering spiritual, not animal, offerings to God. 1 Peter 2:4 And coming to Him as to a living stone which has been rejected by people, but is choice and precious in the sight of God, 5 you also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house for a holy priesthood, to offer spiritual sacrifices that are acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.” Those who practice sorcery or adultery or swearing falsely or who oppress the widows or orphans will be judged in the future and no longer will anyone say that those who are evil are blessed by God.
  6. 3: 7 “From the days of your fathers you have turned away from My statutes and have not kept them. Return to Me, and I will return to you,” says the Lord of armies. “But you say, ‘How shall we return?’ Malachi doesn’t give an answer to this question, but the answer should be obvious: “repent and keep the laws of the Lord”.
  7. 3: 8 “Would anyone rob God? Yet you are robbing Me! But you say, ‘How have we robbed You?’ Malachi’s answer: B/c you are not tithing (giving a tenth) as you were commanded by God. He challenges them to test God by tithing and then watch the windows of heaven open up to give them overflowing blessings. Is this sin another reason why Americans are making more money than ever and yet falling behind economically? The average American Christian gives around 2.5% of their income to church or charity, and about 5% of Americans regularly tithe, which is giving 10% of their income. However, some studies show that a larger portion of practicing Christians (around 40%) say they tithe at least 10% of their income. 
  8. 3: 13 “Your words have been arrogant against Me,” says the Lord. “Yet you say, ‘What have we spoken against You?’ Malachi’s answer: B/c you say that it is pointless to serve God and there is no benefit in obeying Him. Malachi calls this “arrogance” b/c it is challenging God’s promise to bless the righteous, calling God a liar. It might not look like God is blessing the righteous at times, but in the end they will be blessed. The time will come when it is obvious that the righeous will be blessed and the evil will be punished (again referring to 70 AD). “The day is coming” (usually this phrase refers to Messianic times in the future) when the evil will be chaff to be burned. John the Baptist predicted that the Messiah would do this in 70 AD: Matthew 3:11 “As for me, I baptize you [i]with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 12 His winnowing fork is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clear His threshing floor; and He will gather His wheat into the barn, but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.” But the “sun of righteousness” would bless those who fear and obey God with spiritual healing and joy. God would send a forerunner, Elijah, to try to get the evil Jews to repent before the “great and terrible day of the Lord”. Jesus said this prediction of Elijah coming was fulfilled in John the Baptist. Matthew 17:9 When they were coming down from the mountain, Jesus commanded them, saying, “Tell the vision to no one until the Son of Man has risen from the dead.” 10 And His disciples asked Him, “Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?” 11 And He answered and said, “Elijah is coming and will restore all things; 12 but I say to you that Elijah already came, and they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they wanted. So also the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands.” 13 Then the disciples understood that He had spoken to them about John the Baptist.” Matthew 11:13 For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John. 14 And if you are willing to accept it, John himself is Elijah who was to come.” This shows that the “great and terrible day of the Lord” in Malachi 4:5 is the judgment day on the Jews in 70 AD. This is one of the many OT predictions for the Messianic times that will be fulfilled spiritually or figuratively and not literally. John the Baptist could come like Elijah trying to get the evil Jews to repent.

Here is a good slide of the 8 questions although it doesn’t match my 8 questions exactly.

Malachi is the last book in the OT and perhaps the last chronological event occurring simultaneously with the 3rd return from exile under Nehemiah. Malachi was the last prophet. His book begins a 400 year period where there were no prophets recognized by the Jews and no inspired writings to be collected in the Hebrew OT canon. 1 Maccabees 9:27 states that “there was great distress in Israel, such as had not been since the time that prophets ceased to appear among them,” suggesting a period of prophetic silence. They are called the “silent years” for this reason, although they are filled with action. During this 400 years Alexander the Great would conquer the Persians just as Daniel predicted in Daniel 2,7, and 8. Alexander’s kingdom would be split among his 4 generals just as Daniel predicted in Daniel 7. Two of those 4 kingdoms that formed from the split would be the Ptolemies of Egypt and the Seleucids of Syria: both would control the Jews in Palestine for long periods of time during the 400 silent years. 1,2 Maccabees in the Apocrypha tells of the Maccabean priestly family who led a rebel uprising that defeated the Syrians and gained independence for Israel for about 100 years. Then in 63 BC the Romans took control of Palestine just as Daniel predicted in Daniel 2,7,and 8. After Malachi, however, there is nothing left for God to predict about the future Messianic times. All the OT predictions about the Messiah and his kingdom had been written by the prophets and collected by the Jews by 400 BC. God is just waiting for the “fulness of times” (Gal 4:4), for the Romans to rise to power, so He can send His son the Messiah to fulfill all OT predictions. It is interesting that the Apocrypha contains 1st and 2nd Esdras (the Greek name for Ezra) which duplicates a lot of the history of the returns, has apocalyptic visions of the end of the world, and answers questions about the suffering of God’s people. Those apocryphal books describe the Messianic expectations that the Jews held during the 400 silent years. That “silence” would be broken by the birth of Jesus beginning with Matthew 1. Unfortunately the Jews expected a Messiah who would restore the physical power of the Jewish kingdom and who would defeat the Romans, but Jesus came to begin a spiritual kingdom, the church. Thus most of the Jews except for a “remnant” rejected Jesus and continued in their evil ways till 70 AD when they would be judged, just as Malachi predicted.

It is an interesting parallel of the “God says but you say” today. God says that homosexuality is a sin, but you (those who reject God’s word) say it is not (many of whom form the liberal churches that have split off for the LGBQT movement). God say that Jesus is His special messenger and Son, but you (the Muslims, unbelieving Jews) say that Jesus was just a prophet or rabbi but not the Son of God. God says that there is only one God, Yahweh, but you (the Hindus) say there are many gods. God says that He created all things through Jesus in the beginning but you (the atheists) say that there is no creator god. God says that the Bible is the Word of God but you (the skeptics and liberals) say that the Bible is just the work of men and is not inspired by God).

I hope that this study in Malachi will edify you. Pray for America. We have lost our Christian foundation. You have to wonder if God will bring judgment on our nation just as He did the Jews in 70 AD. Is there a “great and terrible day of the Lord” awaiting us if we do not repent and return to keeping God’s word?

THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

We just observed another Easter in memory of the resurrection of Jesus. Paul told us that the resurrection of Jesus is the ultimate proof of Christianity. 1 Corinthians 15:14 … if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain, your faith also is in vain. 15 Moreover, we are even found to be false witnesses of God, because we testified against God that He raised Christ, whom He did not raise, if in fact the dead are not raised. 16 For if the dead are not raised, then not even Christ has been raised; 17 and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. 18 Then also those who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If we have hoped in Christ only in this life, we are of all people most to be pitied.” (NASB) Jesus had said that the last and final proof or sign of eternal life through Jesus would be the resurrection of Jesus. Matthew 12:38 Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to Him, “Teacher, we want to see a sign from You.” 39 But He answered and said to them, “An evil and adulterous generation craves a sign; and so no sign will be given to it except the sign of Jonah the prophet; 40 for just as Jonah was in the stomach of the sea monster for three days and three nights, so will the Son of Man be in the heart of the earth for three days and three nights.” (NASB)  Paul told the heathen idol worshippers in Athens: Acts 17:31 … He has set a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness through a Man whom He has appointed, having furnished proof to all people by raising Him from the dead.” In other words, the greatest sign to confirm Jesus as God’s Son and the Savior of the world was his resurrection from the dead. If you can’t believe that really happened, then none of the miracles Jesus did will convince you.

But how do we really know that Jesus was raised from the dead after 3 days in the tomb? Well how do we know than any event really happened in the past? We rely on “credible eyewitness testimony”. How do we know that we actually walked on the moon? Many do not believe that we did. You can understand their skepticism b/c of all the government lies in the past and conspiracy theories that probably are true a lot of the time. So we examine all the evidence, the hundreds of NASA employees who took part in that moon landing. We watch the footage on TV. Yes, the footage could be fake, but it appears to be true. We hear the eyewitness testimony of the 2 men who walked on the moon. We come to the conclusion that we did indeed walk on the moon.

So we examine the evidence for Jesus’ resurrection. Are there a sufficient number of eyewitnesses? The Law required at least 2 or 3 witnesses to confirm an event, but the resurrection of Jesus has many more than that. Paul says that there was a sufficient number. 1 Corinthians 15:3 For I handed down to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6 After that He appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom remain until now, but some have fallen asleep; 7 then He appeared to James, then to all the apostles; 8 and last of all, as to one untimely born, He appeared to me also.” That is a more than sufficient number of eyewitnesses of the resurrection. Paul even says that most of the 500 that He appeared to were still alive at the time of writing 1 Corinthians. People living at the time that Paul wrote that could actually go talk to those people to decide if they really saw the resurrected Jesus. Some say that those who saw the resurrected Jesus were hallucinating, but 500 people don’t get the same hallucination.

But are those eyewitnesses “credible’, i.e. believable? In a court case, the credibility of the eyewitnesses will be checked out and challenged. What about the eyewitnesses of the resurrection? Were they credible? To determine that, we examine their motives for making up a lie about a resurrection of Jesus if it really didn’t happen. Did the apostles who were the main eyewitnesses of the resurrection gain power or money by lying about seeing Jesus raised? No, they suffered for the rest of their lives b/c they preached the resurrection. They all died martyr’s deaths b/c of their testimony, including John the apostle whom the church father Papias said died at the hands of the Jews just as Jesus predicted would happen to the brothers James and John. No one would die for a lie if they knew it was a lie. Muslim terrorists who kill themselves when they kill others die for a lie, but they believe the lie to be true. Not so with the apostles. Surely one of them would have recanted their testimony of the resurrection if they had just made up the resurrection story, but none did.

What’s even more impressive is the testimony of Paul and James the Lord’s brother. Saul, who later was named Paul, was killing Christians, thinking he was doing God a service. He was rising in power and prestige among the Jewish authorities. What could have changed him to become a believer in Jesus? He saw the resurrected Jesus on the road to Damascus, and that convinced him that Jesus really was the Son of God. He gained no power or money from converting to Christianity. Instead he lost all power and money. He suffered greatly for the rest of his lie to testify of the resurrected Jesus. He gives his testimony twice, in Acts 22 and 26, as proof that Jesus was raised from the dead. He boldly told King Agrippa: Acts 26:22 So, having obtained help from God, I stand to this day testifying both to small and great, stating nothing but what the Prophets and Moses said was going to take place, 23 as to whether the Christ was to suffer, and whether, as first from the resurrection of the dead, He would proclaim light both to the Jewish people and to the Gentiles.” Then there was James the Lord’s brother who did not believe that Jesus was the Son of God before he saw the resurrected Jesus (1 Corinthians 15:7). So the eyewitnesses of the resurrection were not just 12 apostles who had been with Jesus for 3 years and who might have been part of some conspiracy to make up the story of a resurrection of Jesus. Even Paul and James, who did not want to believe in Jesus, came to believe in Him b/c they actually saw Jesus raised from the dead.

Some say that the disciples stole the body of Jesus from the tomb and then made up a lie that he had been raised? What would they gain from that? Also there were at least 4 Roman guards at the tomb who would be killed if they allowed anyone to steal Jesus’ body. The Jews made up a story that the guards fell asleep and that the disciples stole the body of Jesus. It is obvious that the apostles were too terrified to risk their lives by stealing the body. They went into hiding after Jesus was arrested. It is unbelievable that they would be able to tiptoe past sleeping guards, roll the huge stone away from the tomb, steal the body from the tomb, and tiptoe past the sleeping guards as they carried the body away without waking the guards. Even if they did that, why did the Roman and Jewish authorities not simply go arrest them and find out where they put the stolen body of Jesus? The fact that the enemies of Jesus made up the story about the disciples stealing the body proves that the tomb was indeed empty. That’s a major point. Even the enemies admit that the tomb was empty. So now we must examine their explanation of the empty tomb, and when we do, their story makes no sense.

What about the “swoon theory”? Some say that Jesus “swooned” or faked death in some way. Maybe he was drugged to a very low heart rate, even appearing to be dead. But what about the Romans who crucified him who did not break his legs to hasten his death? They were professional crucifiers who knew when a victim was dead. Plus one put a spear into Jesus side and brought out blood and water. Could Jesus have survived that, along with the scourging, and come out of the tomb after 3 days without any medical help if he was not really dead at all?

Then there’s The Passover Plot, a best selling book by Schonfield, published in 1965. ‘Schonfield’s central idea is that Jesus was a mortal man of intense faith who, reading the many signs and prophecies in existence in old Jewish scripture, decided that he was the Messiah. He then went out of his way to confirm this through enacting the other prophecies that had been made about the Anointed One, the King of the Jews, the Son of David, and the Son of Man, as his many names alternately translate as. Schonfield even posits a theory about Jesus faking his death – timing his crucifixion so that it would last only a short time due to the Sabbath, being administered a narcotic through a sponge dipped in vinegar wine – only for it to be ruined by the famous stab in the side he received from a Roman soldier.” The theory here is that the tinyband of Secret Jesus Conspirators had visited the tomb on Saturday night to help restore Jesus but found him too mortally wounded (from the unexpected Roman spear thrust in his side); so they then got his final instructions before he ‘died’ (a ‘second’ time”). Then they reburied him nearby (in the vegetable garden?) in an unmarked grave (like Moses). Supposedly it was someone else who was seen on Easter Sunday at the tomb, giving rise to the speculation that Jesus had been raised. (by scottmanleyhadley) I was in the 10th grade when this book came out and our preachers were condemning it as blasphemy, which it was. The post resurrection appearances of Jesus is the proof that the book’s premise is false.

One further proof of the resurrection: where did they first start preaching and witnessing to the resurrection? It was in Jerusalem where the resurrection supposedly occurred. You might hear someone say there was a resurrection of a dead person somewhere far off in Africa, but with no verification of that. But this is like a few of us saying that we saw someone raised from the dead 50 days ago just a few miles away from here in a cemetery. People would be able to easily check the veracity of that claim. Just 50 days after the resurrection the apostles are saying they saw Jesus raised from the dead just a short distance away, and thousands accepted that as a true testimony in Acts 2. The enemies said nothing to contradict Peter’s claim in his sermon in Acts 2 that Jesus had been raised from the dead 50 days before that.

Can we be 100% sure that Jesus was raised from the dead? I guess not in one sense. Just like we can’t be 100% sure that we landed on the moon. But it appears that there is more than enough evidence that Jesus was raised from the dead and that our faith is not in vain. More importantly, we can be sure that we receive an eternal immortal body that will live on eternally after we die physically. Jesus said, “he that believes in me will live even if he dies” (John 11:25). The same power that raised Jesus from the dead raises us from the dead spiritually when we become Christians. After our baptism, we receive an immortal spiritual body that will live on after we die.

As i approach the latter years of life, it helps me to review the evidence and proof for the resurrection of Jesus from the dead. I hope it helps you.

THE MURDERS OF JOHN AND BETTY STAM

On By nrfaughtLeave a comment

John Stam was born in 1907 and Betty Stam was born in 1906. Betty was raised in China by a missionary father. Both attended Moody Bible institute then were married in China in 1933 and began their mission work with China Inland Missions in China in November, 1934 during the Chinese Civil War. One month later they, along with their 3 month old daughter Helen were arrested by Communists for ransom, although the ransom note demanding $20,000 was never delivered. “The Communists knew that John was a Christian missionary and they despised him and his family because of it. They passionately believed in the Marxist teaching, “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the masses.” (from Eugene in BacktoJerusalem.com) They were marched 12 miles, during which in an overnight stay Betty hid baby Helen in a sleeping bag and left her. Later John were beheaded. A Christian shopkeeper was also executed for trying to get the soldiers to not kill the Stams. John Stam wrote a note to the mission authorities of how he and his wife had been captured, then wrote, “Philippians 1:20: ‘May Christ be glorified whether by life or death.'” The note was found after they died. Baby Helen was found by a Chinese pastor in an abandoned house along with $10 (which he and his wife used to buy milk for the baby) and rescued. She was taken to her maternal grandparents who were also missionaries in China, and then was raised by her aunt and uncle in the U.S.

What were you doing when you were 27 or 28 years old? My wife and I would have been about that age when we were finishing up our 2 years mission work in Colombia, South America. It was about that time that some kidnapping of Americans began. Our first child, Nicole, was about 2 years old (she was born whle we were in Trinidad) at that time although I don’t remember being concerned about the kidnappings. But I can’t imagine how the Stams felt during their ordeal. Married a little over a year and with a 3 month old baby, they are kidnapped and face execution. Is God not protecting those sent out to preach the gospel of His Son Jesus? Can you imagine Helen leaving her 3 month old baby girl hidden in a sleeping bag, saying good bye to her not knowing the fate of the child but fairly certain that the child would be killed if she stayed with the Stams. Can you imagine the feelings of the maternal grandparents when baby Helen was brought to them, knowing what happened to their daughter and son in law, knowing that the child would never know her parents? Can you imagine the horror that the kidnapping and murder of the Stams was felt back in the Moody Bible Institute among the former teachers and mentors of the Stams?

“Betty had written this in a journal entry before leaving for China, “I want something really worthwhile to live for. Like most young people, I want to invest this one life of mine as wisely as possible, in the place that yields richest profits to the world and to me … I want it to be God’s choice for me and not my own. There must be no self-interest at all, or I do not believe God can reveal His will clearly … I know very well that I can never realize the richest, most satisfying, life Christ meant for me, if I am not giving my own life unselfishly for others. I want Him to lead, and His Spirit to fill me. And then, only then, will I feel that my life is justifying its existence and realizing the maturity in Him that Christ meant for all men, in all parts of the world.” (From Melissaspoelstraministries )

The sacrifice of the Stams inspired many to go into foreign missions, citing a new generation of young missionaries. 700 young people from Moody Bible Institute and 200 from Wheaton Bible college pledge to follow the Stams example. The murder of the Stams will either inspire you to go all in for Jesus or cause you to have doubts about the existence of God. How can God stand back and allow those murders to happen? In the same way He stood back and allowed evil men to crucify and kill HIs Son on the cross. It is that simple. God knew that He was going to raise Jesus 3 days later, which is why we celebrate Easter Sunday today, April 20, 2025. He knew that He was going to bring John and Betty Stam to glory after their martyrdom. It had to be tough on them and yet joyful as they looked down from heaven and saw their precious baby being taken care of after their death. I believe that faithful saints go straight to heaven and can actually see what is going on down on earth and even feel sorrow or joy. I know there are passages about “no tears in heaven” but those passages usually refer to spiritual joy of Christians on earth.

Hopefully this story will inspire us to pray for and support missionaries who are sharing the gospel all over the world, especially among the unreached peoples groups which make up about 1/3 of the world’s population.