PAUL’S SUFFERING

Paul’s conversion is a great proof for the resurrection of Jesus. He was feared by the Jewish Christians and none of them would have dared to try to convert him. It was only seeing the resurrected Jesus on the road to Damascus that convinced him that Jesus was the Son of God and the Messiah. He had been ascending in power among the Jews but gave that up to preach the gospel of Jesus, especially to the Gentiles. He preached the gospel for about 26 years or so. Often preachers will be motivated by money, power, or sex. Paul gained none of those by becoming a Christian. He actually spent most of those 26 years suffering for Christ.

2 Corinthians 11:23 Are they servants of Christ?—I am speaking as if insane—I more so; in far more labors, in far more imprisonments, beaten times without number, often in danger of death. 24 Five times I received from the Jews thirty-nine lashes25 Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, a night and a day I have spent adrift at sea. 26 I have been on frequent journeys, in dangers from rivers, dangers from robbers, dangers from my countrymen, dangers from the Gentiles, dangers in the city, dangers in the wilderness, dangers at sea, dangers among false brothers; 27 I have been in labor and hardship, through many sleepless nights, in hunger and thirst, often without food, in cold and exposure. 28 Apart from such external things, there is the daily pressure on me of concern for all the churches. 29 Who is weak without my being weak? Who is led into sin without my intense concern? 30 If I have to boast, I will boast of what pertains to my weakness. 31 The God and Father of the Lord Jesus, He who is blessed forever, knows that I am not lying. 32 In Damascus the ethnarch under Aretas the king was guarding the city of the Damascenes in order to seize me, 33 and I was let down in a basket through a window in the wall, and so escaped his hands.”

Some of these incidents are recorded in Acts. For example, in Acts 14:19ff Paul was stoned, dragged outside of the city, and left for dead in Lystra on his 1st missionary journey. In Acts 16:22-24 Paul and Barnabas were scourged in Philippi on the 2nd journey. In Acts 22:25 he was illegally flogged by a Roman commander in Jerusalem, not realizing that Paul was a Roman citizen. He was shipwrecked on the voyage to Rome as a prisoner in Acts 27 (although that had not happened yet when he wrote 2 Corinthians). I’m sure Paul had specific incidents in mind as he wrote 2 Corinthians 11.

Often he mentioned his suffering in general terms. The Lord warned him through Ananias when he was in Damascus when Ananias was giving Paul his commission from God: Acts 9:15-16 “But the Lord said to him, ‘Go, for he is a chosen vessel of mine to bear My name before Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel. 16 For I will show him how many things he must suffer for My name’s sake.’” Paul faced death on many occasions. 2 Corinthians 4:we are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not despairing; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed; 10 always carrying around in the body the dying of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body. 11 For we who live are constantly being handed over to death because of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our mortal flesh. 12 So death works in us, but life in you.” 2 Timothy 3:10 Now you followed my teaching, conduct, purpose, faith, patience, love, perseverance, 11 persecutions, and sufferings, such as happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium, and at Lystra; what persecutions I endured, and out of them all the Lord rescued me! 12 Indeed, all who want to live in a godly way in Christ Jesus will be persecuted.” 2 Corinthians 6:but in everything commending ourselves as servants of God, in much endurance, in afflictions, in hardships, in difficulties, in beatings, in imprisonments, in mob attacks, in labors, in sleeplessness, in hunger, in purity, in knowledge, in patience, in kindness, in the Holy Spirit, in genuine love, in the word of truth, and in the power of God; by the weapons of righteousness for the right hand and the left, by glory and dishonor, by evil report and good report; regarded as deceivers and yet true; as unknown and yet well known, as dying and yet behold, we are alive; as punished and yet not put to death, 10 as sorrowful yet always rejoicing, as poor yet making many rich, as having nothing and yet possessing all things.” Paul had a thorn in the flesh that God would not remove, but even then he wrote in 2 Corinthians 12:And He has said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness.” Most gladly, therefore, I will rather boast about my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may dwell in me. 10 Therefore I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in distresses, in persecutions, in difficulties, in behalf of Christ; for when I am weak, then I am strong.”

One of the most amazing statements by Paul is 2 Corinthians 4:16 Therefore we do not lose heart, but though our outer person is decaying, yet our inner person is being renewed day by day. 17 For our momentary, light affliction is producing for us an eternal weight of glory far beyond all comparison, 18 while we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal.” He called all those things he suffered “momentary, light affliction”! Momentary compared to eternity, but “light” affliction?

No wonder Paul was ready during his house arrest in Rome, even hopeful, that he might be able to just go on and be with the Lord. Philippians 1:21 For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain. 22 But if I am to live on in the flesh, this will mean fruitful labor for me; and I do not know which to choose. 23 But I am hard-pressed from both directions, having the desire to depart and be with Christ, for that is very much better; 24 yet to remain on in the flesh is more necessary for your sakes.” He was convinced at that time that he would be released and able to visit the Philippians again. Philippians 1:25 Convinced of this, I know that I will remain and continue with you all for your progress and joy in the faith, 26 so that your pride in Christ Jesus may be abundant because of me by my coming to you again.” He was released from his 2 years of house arrest in Rome and made another missionary journey, probably even went to Spain which he had long wanted to do.

His tone is totally different in 2 Timothy in his 2nd imprisonment in Rome in 64 AD. He had made that 4th journey, leaving Titus in Crete, Timothy in Ephesus, probably arrested in Macedonia and carried to Rome. Probably to a dungeon this time. 2 Timothy 4:For I am already being poured out as a drink offering, and the time of my departure has come. I have fought the good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept the faith; in the future there is reserved for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day; and not only to me, but also to all who have loved His appearing.” He tells Timothy to come to him “soon”, “before winter”. He probably doesn’t survive the winter before he is beheaded by Nero. But he is still confident. 2 Timothy 4:18 The Lord will rescue me from every evil deed, and will bring me safely to His heavenly kingdom; to Him be the glory forever and ever. Amen.”

We Gentile Christians all over the world owe so much to the apostle Paul. He suffered so much to lay the groundwork of Christianity among the Gentiles. Christianity eventually was legalized and spread throughout the Roman Empire. The Catholic church was corrupt but did spread Christianity all over the world. Protestantism spread to those of us in America. Christianity might have just breen another Jewish sect if it had not been for Paul. It is amazing what God accomplished with one man to spread the gospel to the Gentiles.

It just dawned on me that Paul would probably have been one of those martyrs mentioned in Revelation. Revelation 7:After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could count, from every nation and all the tribes, peoples, and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, and palm branches were in their hands. 13 Then one of the elders responded, saying to me, “These who are clothed in the white robes, who are they, and where have they come from?” 14 I said to him, “My lord, you know.” And he said to me, “These are the ones who come out of the great tribulation, and they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. 15 For this reason they are before the throne of God, and they serve Him day and night in His temple; and He who sits on the throne will spread His tabernacle over them. 16 They will no longer hunger nor thirst, nor will the sun beat down on them, nor any scorching heat; 17 for the Lamb in the center of the throne will be their shepherd, and will guide them to springs of the water of life; and God will wipe every tear from their eyes.”

Revelation was written about 65 AD and Paul was beheaded about 64 AD. If those dates are correct, Paul would have been one of those martyrs in white robes that were already enjoying heaven when the book of Revelation was written.

Thank you Paul. I know you are enjoying your reward in heaven. We look forward to talking with you some day, hearing the stories of your journeys first hand.

PAUL’S MISSIONARY JOURNEYS AND DEATH

Here is a great chronological cummary of Paul’s missionary journeys and death.

https://www.dwellcc.org/essays/chronological-study-pauls-ministry#:~:text=Paul%20described%20his%20conversion%20in,%E2%80%9D%20(2:1).

Paul’s 1st visit to Jerusalem is found in Galatians 1 and Acts 9 where he went to Jerusalem 3 years after his conversion for a brief 15 day stay, meeting only Peter and James the Lord’s brother. We pick up after his 2nd visit to Jerusalem as found in Acts (Acts 11:27-30) for famine relief to the Jewish saints in Jerusalem. That would be the same visit to Jerusalem in Galatians 2 which was 14 years after his conversion. That visit to Jerusalem in Galatians 2 was also the 2nd visit to Jerusalem in Galatians.

C. The period from the 2nd until the 3rd visit to Jerusalem.

  1. After the relief visit (2nd visit) to Jerusalem (Acts 11:27-30; Galatians 2), Paul returned to Antioch.
  2. Very soon afterwards, the 1st missionary journey began.
    • Paul, Mark, and Barnabas traveled from Antioch to Seleucia, the nearest port, then to Cyprus.
    • Then they went to Pamphylia which lies to the north of Cyprus in modern day Turkey.
    • From there, they went to Galatia, as far as the city of Derbe, but without Mark, who went home.
    • Then they went back through the same cities in the opposite direction.
    • Finally, they sailed from Perga back to Antioch of Syria.
    • This entire journey lasted from six to nine months, concluding before the storms of winter would have stopped ship travel in the Mediterranean.

D. The period from the first missionary trip through the second journey (including the Jerusalem council).

  1. Paul traveled from Antioch to Jerusalem for the Jerusalem council (Acts 15), then back to Antioch.
  2. At that time, Paul began the 2nd Missionary Journey (Acts 15-17).
    • Paul and Barnabas parted ways. Paul went with Silas and Barnabas went with John Mark.
    • Paul and Silas journeyed from Antioch to Syria and Cilicia, this time using the overland route through Turkey.
    • They visited Derbe and Lystra (where he picked up Timothy to go with him), then passed through Phrygia and Galatia. They arrived at Troas, where Paul had a vision calling them to Macedonia. Luke joined Paul and Silas at Troas.
    • Upon arrival, they went to Philippi (where he converted Lydia the seller of purple and the Philippian jailor), then to Samothrace, Neopolis, Amphipolis, Thessalonica (where the unbelieving Jews drove him out), and Berea (where the Jews were more noble miinded, searching the Scriptures daily to verify Paul’s preaching).
    • Then Paul went to Athens where he preached to the idol worshippers on Mars Hill, and finally to Corinth where he stayed for 1 1/2 years making tents with Aquilla and Priscilla. He wrote 1 and 2 Thessalonians from Corinth after Timothy brought him reports from Thessalonica.
    • After the Macedonian and Greek ministry, he traveled briefly to Ephesus, Caesarea, and back to Antioch in Syria.

Paul’s 3rd Missionary Journey (Acts 18-21)

  • Paul again traveled overland from Antioch to Phrygia and Galatia.
  • He then traveled to Ephesus where he preached and taught for over three years. He wrote 1 Corinthians while in Ephesus. There was a riot tarted by Demetrius the idol maker.
  • After the Ephesian ministry, Paul sailed to Macedonia (where he wrote 2 Corinthians after Titus meeting him there after a visit to Corinth), and went by foot to Greece including a second stop at Corinth (2 Cor. 13:1). During this three month stay, he wrote the book of Romans.
  • Paul then went back to Macedonia stopping at Philippi, before setting sail for Troas.
  • From Troas, he sailed for Jerusalem stopping on the way at Assos, Mytelene, Chios, Samos, Miletus (where he called for the elders from Ephesus to come meet him), Ephesus, Cos, Rhodes, Patara, Tyre, Ptolemais, and Caesarea.
  • He had several representatives from the churches traveling with him at the end of this journey, each bringing money collected at their churches for the famine relief in Jerusalem.
  • I believe Paul wrote the Galatian letter during this 3rd journey. He was very critical of them in the letter and it seems that he wasn’t able to ever visit them again in person, which would be the case since he never made it back to Antioch at the end of the 3rd journey.

E. Paul’s arrest in Jerusalem, and imprisonment at Caesarea (Acts 21:17-26:32)

  • Paul was arrested in Jerusalem shortly after arriving from his 3rd Missionary Journey.
  • Only days later, he was then taken to Caesarea where he was imprisoned for 2 years.
  • This is where he and Luke wrote the book of Luke, and later, the book of Acts.
  • He appeared in various trials before the Roman governors Felix, and then Festus. Fearing a Jewish plot to kill him, he appealed to Caesar to have his trial before Caesar. His last trial was before Festus and King Agrippa before being sent to Rome.

F. Paul’s trip to Rome (Acts 27-28)

  1. Paul’s prison ship left from Caesarea and sailed to Sidon, Myra, and Fair Havens on Crete, where he stayed until after the Day of Atonement.
  2. He then sailed west until a fierce storm left him shipwrecked on Malta. He wintered there for 3 months.
  3. When Spring came, he sailed to Syracuse, Rhegium, and Puteoli, finally arriving in Rome, where he remained in prisoned in a private house for 2 more years.
  4. During that 2 years he wrote the “prison epistles”: Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon.

G. Paul’s movements after the Roman imprisonment.

Paul was apparently freed after the 2 year house arresst Roman imprisonment. There is Biblical and
early church historical evidence and that Paul was released and traveled more,
including a trip to Spain, according to Clement of Rome in 1 Clement (see also
Romans 15:24).

Some call this his 4th missionary journey. He left Titus at Crete, Timothy at Ephesus, and wrote 1 Timothy and Titus probably from Macedonia. At some point after that he was arrested and taken to Rome where in his last months he wrote 2 Timothy. He was martyred (beheaded by Nero) in the summer of 64 AD.

The article above does a great job of trying to get the exact dates in Paul’s life and travels if you care to dig into that. Some key conclusions: Paul was converted (Acts 9) in 33-34 AD (Jesus was crucified in 30 AD). His 2nd visit to Jerusalem as recorded in Acts 11:27-30 was about 46 AD (a date given for the famine by Tacitus), which would be about 14 years (Galatians 2:1) from his conversion if the Galatians 2 visit to Jerusalem (the 2nd visit to Jerusalem in Galatians) is indeed the same visit as the Acts 11 famine visit (which I think it is). According to Josephus Herod died (Acts 12) about 44 AD which fits the 2nd visit to Jerusalem in Acts 11 to be. about 44 AD also. The 1st missionary journey (Acts 13,14) began about 48 AD. The Jerusalem conference of Acts 15 was about 48-49 AD.The 2nd missionary journey began about 49 AD. There is historical evidence that Gallo was proconsul in Corinth about 51 AD when Paul appeared before him on his 2nd journey, which fits the beginning of the 2nd journey in 49 AD since Paul spent 18 months in Corinth. He began his 3rd journey in 52 AD. He spent 3 years in Ephesus and the 3rd journey ended when he was arrested in Jerusalem in 55 AD. He spent 2 years in prison in Caesarea under Felix so he started his voyage to Rome as a prisoner in 57 AD. He arrived as a prisoner in Rome in 58 AD and spent 58-60 AD in his own hired quarters in Rome and the end of the book of Acts. He made a 4th journey and was arrested again and put in Roman prison. He was beheaded in 64 AD.

Here is a pretty good timeline for the chronology of Paul’s conversion, journeys, and death except for the last entry “60-67 AD Rome House Arrest”. We know he was in house arrest for 2 years, released, made a 4th journey and was beheaded about 64 AD. Also he wrote 1 Timothy and Titus on that 4th journey and 2 Timothy just before he was beheaded in 64 AD. Otherwise it is a good chart with similar dates to what the article came up with. As stated earlier, I believe Galatians was written during the 3rd journey and not the 1st.

There are many other facts and stories not covered in this summary.

SAUL’S 14 YEARS FOLLOWING HIS CONVERSION

So what happened after Saul was baptized in Damascus by Ananias? Acts 9:19 “Now for several days he was with the disciples who were in Damascus, 20 and immediately he began to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues, saying, “He is the Son of God.” 21 All those hearing him continued to be amazed, and were saying, “Is this not the one who in Jerusalem destroyed those who called on this name, and had come here for the purpose of bringing them bound before the chief priests?” 22 But Saul kept increasing in strength and confounding Jews who lived in Damascus by proving that this Jesus is the Christ.”

I find it interesting that his first proclamation was “He is the Son of God.” That was what Christians had been saying about Jesus that made Saul want to kill them for blasphemy. Now he has a simple message: “He really is the Son of God.” The Muslims tells us that God does not have a Son, that Christians added that doctrine, that Jesus was only a prophet who never claimed to be the Son of God. Saul saw the resurrected Jesus and that was sufficient proof to him that Jesus really was the Son of God. Saul also confounded the Jews in Damascus by “proving” that this Jesus is the Christ. The Greek word for proving is sumbibazó: To unite, to bring together, to instruct, to prove. Thayer’s says this means “to cause a person to unite with one in a conclusion or come to the same opinion, to prove, demonstrate“. It can imply the act of proving or concluding something through logical reasoning or evidence.

So how would Saul prove that Jesus was the Christ (the Greek translation of the Hebrew word Messiah)? The method is this. He would show all the predictions made by the Old Testament prophets that the Messiah would have to fulfill in order to prove that he was the Messiah. Examples would be Micah 5:2 that he must be born in Bethlehem. His lineage would have to be from David as shown in Matthew’s genealogy in Matthew 1. He would have to do many miracles such as sight to the blind, etc. as predicted in Isaiah 35. He would have to fulfilled all the predictions in Isaiah 53 about being pierced, scourged, hung between 2 thieves, buried in a rich man’s tomb, and raised from the dead. There were more of these predictions. Saul would show all these predictions and then tell how Jesus fulfilled every single one of them, the most important of which was Jesus’ resurrection the which Saul is now a witness of. The conclusion of this argumentation would be that Jesus was the predicted Messiah. Faith in Jesus is based on such logical, rational arguments. It is not just a fell good religion. It is not just an accept it by blind faith relgion. In Acts 17:31 God “gave proof that Jesus would judge the world by raising him from the dead.” God gave us plenty of proof that Christianity is the only true religion.

This was the method Saul used in the synagogues in trying to convert Jews. Acts 17:1 “Now when they had traveled through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a synagogue of the Jews. And according to Paul’s custom, he visited them, and for three Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and giving evidence that the Christ had to suffer and rise from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus whom I am proclaiming to you is the Christ.” Again, rational logical reasoning giving proof or evidence from the Old Testament Scriptures using the same method as in Acts 9:19-22. Notice in these verses that specific evidence was given that the Christ had to suffer and rise from the dead. That prediction would be from Isaiah 53 mainly where he was a “man of great pain” (53:3), pierced for our offenses (53:5 his crucifixion), by his wounds we are healed (53:5), oppressed and afflicted (53:7), and that He would see His offspring and prolong his days (53:10 his resurrection after death. The Jews could not imagine a Messiah who would die such a horrible suffering death, not to mention a subsequent resurrection. But Saul (called Paul by the time of Acts 17:1-3) showed them that Jesus’ death did not disqualify him from being the Messiah, and that his resurrection was predicted. The Jews simply missed the entire fulfillment of Isaiah 53 by Jesus. Unbelieving Jews today still miss it. It is amazing that they can be so blind to the fulfillment of Isaiah 53 which is in their Old Testament Scriptures.

What happened next is a little difficult to sort out. Galatians 1:15 But when He who had set me apart even from my mother’s womb and called me through His grace was pleased 16 to reveal His Son in me so that I might preach Him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with flesh and blood, 17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me; but I went away to Arabia, and returned once more to Damascus.” This suggests that he went to Arabia after his conversion very soon after his conversion. This was right after Acts 9:20-22 where he did some immediate proclaiming Jesus to be the Son of God and Messiah. Either that or his trip to Arabia came immediately after his convfersion but was very short such that it could still be said that he began proclaiming Christ in Damascus immediately after his conversion.

How long did he stay in Arabia? Galatians 1:18 Then three years later I went up to Jerusalem to become acquainted with Cephas, and stayed with him for fifteen days. 19 But I did not see another one of the apostles except James, the Lord’s brother.” Most say that he was in Arabia 3 years, but Acts 9 says that 23 When many days had elapsed, the Jews plotted together to do away with him, 24 but their plot became known to Saul. They were also closely watching the gates day and night so that they might put him to death; 25 but his disciples took him at night and let him down through an opening in the wall, lowering him in a large basket.” So he spent many days in Damascus before the plot to kill him. So the 3 years of Galatians 1:18 is probably the total of 3 years spent in Arabia and Damascus after his conversion and not just 3 years in Arabia.

What did he do during that time, however long it was, in Arabia? We don’t know. Pure speculation but he perhaps spent time reflecting on his conversion. He makes it a point in Galatians 1 to say that he received his gospel directly from Jesus and not from the other apostles, so perhaps the Holy Spirit spent a lot of time with him instructing him in the new covenant teachings and how he was to preach the gospel to the Gentiles. To me, this time is when the Spirit would make it clear to Paul that the Gentile converts would not have to be circumcised or keep the Law.

After 3 years (total time in Damascus and Arabia after his conversion, probably from AD 33-36) a plot to kill Saul was discovered and the disciples lowered him in a basket through the wall to safety and he fled from Damascus to Jerusalem. Details of this plot and escape are given in 2 Corinthians 11:32 In Damascus the ethnarch under Aretas the king was guarding the city of the Damascenes in order to seize me, 33 and I was let down in a basket through a window in the wall, and so escaped his hands.”

So after 3 years he went to Jerusalem. Galatians 1:Galatians 1:18 Then three years later I went up to Jerusalem to become acquainted with Cephas, and stayed with him for fifteen days. 19 But I did not see another one of the apostles except James, the Lord’s brother.” Again, he is showing that he did not spend enough time in Jerusalem get his particular method of teaching of the gospel to the Gentiles (which did not include making them be circumcised) from the apostles in Jerusalem. I spent two whole years in a school of preaching that highly influenced how I preached the gpspel for the next many years after that. But Paul makes it a point to say that he only spent 15 days, hardly enough to get a complete school of preaching certificate from the apostes. Plus he only saw Peter and James the Lord’s brother. It is interesting that Paul calls James an apostles since he was not. The James who was one of the original 12 apostles was beheaded in Acts 12. James the Lord’s brother was converted and became a pillar of the church in Jerusalem, but he was not one of the 12 apostles. The Greek word for apostle just means “one sent” so it had a generic usage in addition to being used of the origiinal 12 apostles.

Acts 9 gives us more detail about what he did after his escape to Jerusalem. Acts 9:
26 
When he came to Jerusalem, he tried repeatedly to associate with the disciples; and yet they were all afraid of him, as they did not believe that he was a disciple. 27 But Barnabas took hold of him and brought him to the apostles and described to them how he had seen the Lord on the road, and that He had talked to him, and how he had spoken out boldly in the name of Jesus at Damascus. 28 And he was with them, moving about freely in Jerusalem, speaking out boldly in the name of the Lord. 29 And he was talking and arguing with the Hellenistic Jews; but they were attempting to put him to death. 30 Now when the brothers learned of it, they brought him down to Caesarea and sent him away to Tarsus. 31 So the church throughout Judea, Galilee, and Samaria enjoyed peace, as it was being built up; and as it continued in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, it kept increasing.” I assume that these verses describe the 15 days of Galatians 1:18 that he spent in Jerusalem 3 years after his conversion, after he escaped the death plot. Apparently Barnabas brought him to the apostles and told them of Saul’s seeing Jesus on the road and his conversion. But also apparently from Galatians 1:18,19 he only spent time with Peter in Jerusalem during that 15 days, but he was allowed to roam around Jerusalem freely, preaching the gospel during the 15 days.

So we have now tracked Saul from his conversion through the first 3 years in Damascus and Arabia and his escape to Jerusalem after 3 years where he spent 15 days. Acts 9:30 says that after that 15 days he was threatened again and the brethren sent him off to Tarsus, his hometown, where he apparently spent most of the next 14 years up to the Jerusalem conference in Acts 15 in about 40 AD. During that 14 years Barnabas came to Tarsus to get him and they spent a year in the new church in Antioch of Syria. Acts 11:22 The news about them reached the ears of the church in Jerusalem, and they sent Barnabas off to Antioch. 23 Then when he arrived and witnessed the grace of God, he rejoiced and began to encourage them all with [u]resolute heart to remain true to the Lord; 24 for he was a good man, and full of the Holy Spirit and faith. And considerable numbers were added to the Lord. 25 And he left for Tarsus to look for Saul; 26 and when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. And for an entire year they met with the church and taught considerable numbers of people; and the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch. During that year in Antioch he made a 2nd visit to Jerusalem as recorded in Acts 11:27 Now at this time some prophets came down from Jerusalem to Antioch. 28 One of them, named Agabus, stood up and indicated by the Spirit that there would definitely be a severe famine all over the world. And this took place in the reign of Claudius. 29 And to the extent that any of the disciples had means, each of them determined to send a contribution for the relief of the brothers and sisters living in Judea. 30 And they did this, sending it with Barnabas and Saul to the elders.” He apparently made his first missionary journey with Barnabas during that year in Antioch, which took 6-9 months.

Here is a very good outline of all this time sequence. https://www.dwellcc.org/essays/chronological-study-pauls-ministry#:~:text=Paul%20described%20his%20conversion%20in,%E2%80%9D%20(2:1).

A. The period from Paul’s conversion until the 1st trip to Jerusalem.

  1. (Acts 9-12). Paul was converted on the road to Damascus
  2. He entered Damascus and stayed there for an unknown amount of time (Acts 9:19)
  3. Paul went to Arabia for an unspecified period, and returned to Damascus afterward (Gal.1:17).
  4. The whole period from his conversion until his departure from Damascus is given as “3 years” (Gal.1:18)
  5. He went to Jerusalem after this, and stayed for 15 days (Acts 9:26-29; Gal.1:18)

B. The period from the 1st visit until the 2nd visit to Jerusalem.

  1. After the 15 days at Jerusalem, Paul was sent away to avoid capture, and sailed from Caesarea to the regions of Syria and Cilicia (Acts 9:30; Gal.1:21)
  2. After a period ranging from 8 to 14 years, Paul traveled to Antioch with Barnabas and stayed for 1 year in Antioch (Acts 11:25; Gal.1:21-2:1 see below).
  3. Paul then traveled to Jerusalem from Antioch, staying for a short time. This was in connection with the collection taken up in Antioch because of Agabus’ vision (Acts 11:27-30; Gal.2:1). He then returned to Antioch.

C. The period from the 2nd until the 3rd visit to Jerusalem.

  1. After the relief visit (2nd visit) to Jerusalem, Paul returned to Antioch.
  2. Very soon afterwards, the 1st missionary journey began.
    • Paul, Mark, and Barnabas traveled from Antioch to Seleucia, the nearest port, then to Cyprus.
    • Then they went to Pamphylia which lies to the north of Cyprus in modern day Turkey.
    • From there, they went to Galatia, as far as the city of Derbe, but without Mark, who went home.
    • Then they went back through the same cities in the opposite direction.
    • Finally, they sailed from Perga back to Antioch of Syria.
    • This entire journey lasted from six to nine months, concluding before the storms of winter would have stopped ship travel in the Mediterranean.

Next comes the debate: Galatians 2:1 Then after an interval of fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, taking Titus along also.” Was the trip to Jerusalem after 14 years the same trip as the visit to Jerusalem in Acts 15 for the conference to settle the issue of Gentile converts being forced to be circumcised. Or was it the trip to Jerusalem mentioned in Acts 11:27-30 where he carried famine relief money to the church in Jerusalem.

Here is a great article discussing this debate. https://evidenceunseen.com/new-testament/galatians/difficulties/is-this-passage-referring-to-the-council-of-jerusalem-in-acts-15-or-is-it-something-else The author of this article takes the view that the visit to Jerusalem in Galatians 2:1 was not the visit to Jerusalem for the conference in Acts 15. He show the similarities between Acts 15 and Galatians 2, but then points out the differences. I encourage you to read the article. He says that the visit to Jerusalem in Galatians 2:1 is the visit to Jerusalem in Acts 11:27-30 for famine relief. I think I agree with the author.

His main points that persuade me. 1) Acts mentions 3 visits to Jerusalem after his conversion (a visit after 3 years in Acts 9, a visit for famine relief in Acts 11, and a visit for the conference in Acts 15). Galatians only mentions two visits to Jerusalem (after 3 years in Acts 9 and then 14 years later Galatians 2:1). He is very specific about not going to Jerusalem any more than those two visits, so it seems that 2nd visit in Galatians 2:1 would have to be the 2nd visit in Acts 11.

2) Galatians 2 is private discussion with Peter, James, and John but Acts is a very public discussion. It would be reasonable that, if Galatians 2:1 is the same visit as Acts 11:27-30, Paul would visit the 3 men in private to discuss Gentile circumcision since he had only been to Jerusalem once 11 years earlier (the Acts 9 visit 3 years after his conversion. The same subject would be discussed later on his 3rd visit to Jerusalem in Acts 15 for the conference, but that debate was public and fueled by the Jewish brethren iinisting that Gentile converts be circumcised. The private discussion in Galatians 2 and Acts 11 was fueled by Paul himself.

3) It seems that, if the Galatians 2:1 visit was the same as the Acts 15 conference visit, Paul would have mentioned the letter that the conference came up with to send to all the churches. Instead, in Galatians 2 they just shake hands in agreement that the Gentile converts don’t have to be circumcised. Also in Galatians 2 Paul brings Titus as a test case of a Gentile convert who was not required to be circumcised and that is not mentioned at all in Acts 15.

4) In Galatians 2, even after the agreement Paul reached with Peter, James, and John, then later Peter on a visit to Antioch vacillates quickly later and is influenced by men from James (who is back in Jerusalem) to quit eating with the Gentile Christians. It seems unlikely that Peter, who was a main spokesman in Acts 15 of not requiring Gentile converts to be circumcised, would vacillate after the Acts 15 conference and do what is described in Galatians 2:11 But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. 12 For prior to the coming of some men from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he began to withdraw and separate himself, fearing those from the circumcision. 13 The rest of the Jews joined him in hypocrisy, with the result that even Barnabas was carried away by their hypocrisy.” That vacillation seems like it more likely occured after just a brief private discussion with Paul in Galatians 2:1-10 on Paul’s 2nd visit to Jerusalem in Acts 11. Barnabas also vacillates in Galatians 2 in Antioch and it seems unlikely he would vacillate so quickly after being a main spokesman in Acts 15 if that were the same visit.

The author gives other reasons, but the ones discussed here convinced me. See what you think. Not a major issue at all, but some very interesting Bible study!

Wow that ended up long! But I hope it covers the 14 years following Saul’s conversion up to the Galatians 2:1 second visit to Jerusalem which was the 2nd visit to Jerusalem in Acts found in Acts 11:27-30. Thanks for reading!

SAUL PERSECUTED THE JEWISH CHRISTIANS

Saul (later called Paul) had a strict Pharisee background. Philippians 3:Beware of the dogs, beware of the evil workers, beware of the false circumcision; for we are the true circumcision, who worship in the Spirit of God and take pride in Christ Jesus, and put no confidence in the flesh, although I myself could boast as having confidence even in the flesh. If anyone else thinks he is confident in the flesh, I have more reasoncircumcised the eighth day, of the nation of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the Law, a Pharisee.” Acts 22:“I am a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city, educated under Gamaliel, strictly according to the Law of our fathers, being zealous for God just as you all are today (i.e. the Jews he was making his defense to).” Acts 26:“So then, all Jews know my way of life since my youth, which from the beginning was spent among my own nation and in Jerusalem, since they have known about me for a long time, if they are willing to testify, that I lived as a Pharisee according to the strictest sect of our religion.”

We first read of Saul in Acts 7. Some Jews had brought Stephen before the Jewish Council (the Sanhedrin) for a trial. They produced false witnesses saying that Stephen was blaspheming Moses and the Law, which he wasn’t doing. Stephen gives his defense, a long summary or the history of the Jews showing how the Jews had always resisted the Holy Spirit, just as in the current situation. His closing words to his defense were sharp: Acts 7:51 “You men who are stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears are always resisting the Holy Spirit; you are doing just as your fathers did. 52 Which one of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? They killed those who had previously announced the coming of the Righteous One, and you have now become betrayers and murderers of Him; 53 you who received the Law as ordained by angels, and yet did not keep it.” That was too much for them to take. 7:54 Now when they heard this, they were infuriated, and they began gnashing their teeth at him. 55 But he, being full of the Holy Spirit, looked intently into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God; 56 and he said, “Behold, I see the heavens opened and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.” 57 But they shouted with loud voices, and covered their ears and rushed at him with one mind. 58 When they had driven him out of the city, they began stoning him; and the witnesses laid aside their cloaks at the feet of a young man named Saul. 59 They went on stoning Stephen as he called on the Lord and said, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit!” 60 Then he fell on his knees and cried out with a loud voice, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them!” Having said this, he [ak]fell asleep.” The penalty for blasphemy in the Law was stoning. Saul is a young man at this time. Some think that means between 26 and 40 years old. I think he was under 30 (pure speculation). I think he would have been actively throwing stones at Stephen if he were older than that. Instead, he is just holding the garments of those stoning Stephen.

Soon after that Saul begins to persecute Jewish Christians. Acts 8:1 Now Saul approved of putting Stephen to death.And on that day a great persecution began against the church in Jerusalem, and they were all scattered throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria, except for the apostles. Some devout men buried Stephen, and mourned loudly for him. But Saul began ravaging the church, entering house after house; and he would drag away men and women and put them in prison.”

Several verses comment on his persecution of Jewish Christians, whom he considered to be part of a dangerous heretical sect. Galatians 1:13 For you have heard of my former way of life in Judaism, how I used to persecute the church of God beyond measure and tried to destroy it; 14 and I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my contemporaries among my countrymen, being more extremely zealous for my ancestral traditions.” Philippians 3: as to zeal, a persecutor of the church; as to the righteousness which is in the Law, found blameless.”  Acts 22:I persecuted this Way to the death, binding and putting both men and women into prisons, as also the high priest and all the Council of the elders can testify.” Acts 26:“So I thought to myself that I had to act in strong opposition to the name of Jesus of Nazareth. 10 And this is just what I did in Jerusalem; not only did I lock up many of the saints in prisons, after receiving authority from the chief priests, but I also cast my vote against them when they were being put to death. 11 And as I punished them often in all the synagogues, I tried to force them to blaspheme; and since I was extremely enraged at them.”

Acts 26:9-11 especially gives us a picture of how cruel Saul was toward Jewish Christians. No doubt his memories of torturing, imprisoning, and killing Jewish Christians haunted him after he was converted to Jesus. He did all that with a good conscience, thinking that he was serving God by wiping out this heretical sect called Christians. Acts 23:1Now looking intently at the Council, Paul said, “Brothers, I have lived my life with an entirely good conscience before God up to this day.” Of course, that shows that someone can be very devoted to his religion and yet be in a totally false religion. But God know his heart. He knew that Saul would repent and become a believer if given sufficient proof that Jesus was indeed the Son of God raised from the dead.

That’s next!



THE RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD

It seems like the main thing that the Saddcees were known for is that they denied the resurrection. “The Sadducees, a priestly faction in Judaism during the time of Jesus, were known for their limited acceptance of scripture and their rejection of the prophets, including their teachings. They adhered primarily to the Torah (the first five books of the Old Testament) and rejected the prophetic writings and other historical texts, including the writings of the prophets. This rejection extended to doctrines derived from the prophets, such as resurrection and the afterlife, which they denied.” (AI) Daniel 12:2 predicted a resurrection of the dead. If the Sadducees did not believe in the prophets, you can see why they rejected a resurrection of the dead. More on Daniel 12:2 later.

In contrast, the Pharisees believed in the resurrection of the dead. “The Pharisees believed that the Prophets, along with the Writings and the Five Books of Moses (Torah), were divinely inspired and authoritative. They held the scriptures as sacred texts containing God’s word.” Paul used the resurrection of the dead to get the Pharisees and Sadducees arguing among themselves, turning their attention away from their common hatred of Paul. Acts 23:But Paul, perceiving that one group were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, began crying out in the Council, “Brothers, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees; I am on trial for the hope and resurrection of the dead!” When he said this, a dissension occurred between the Pharisees and Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, nor an angel, nor a spirit, but the Pharisees acknowledge them all. And a great uproar occurred; and some of the scribes of the Pharisaic party stood up and started arguing heatedly, saying, “We find nothing wrong with this man; suppose a spirit or an angel has spoken to him?”  NASB

Later in a trial before the governor Felix, Paul said: Acts 24:14 `And I confess this to thee, that, according to the way that they call a sect, so serve I the God of the fathers, believing all things that in the law and the prophets have been written, 15 having hope toward God, which they themselves also wait for, [that] there is about to be a rising again of the dead, both of righteous and unrighteous.” Young’s Literal Translation. Notice the words “about to be”. I will discuss that later. A future resurrection of the dead must have been taught by the prophets for Paul to say this. But where did any of the prophets predict a resurrection of the dead? There is a prediction of a resurrection in Ezekiel 37 in the valley of dry bones. The dry dead bones are the nation of Israel after the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BC and. the captivity in Babylon. But God predicts that in the future He will put HIs Spirit in the bones and they will come out of their graves and live, thus a resurrection. Ezekiel 37:12 Therefore prophesy and say to them, ‘This is what the Lord God says: “Behold, I am going to open your graves and cause you to come up out of your graves, My people; and I will bring you into the land of Israel. 13 Then you will know that I am the Lord, when I have opened your graves and caused you to come up out of your graves, My people. 14 And I will put My Spirit within you and you will come to life.” Anytime the prophets predicted a pouring out of the Spirit it always refers to the Acts 2 pouring out of the miraculous indwelling of the Spirit on the remnant believing Jews during the last days of the Jewish Age (i.e. 30 AD to 70 AD). So this is a Messianic prediction of a a spiritual resurrection from the spiritual dead state of the Jews, but would only be fulfilled in the raising from spiritual death of Jews who believed in Jesus as the Messiah.

We have another prediction of a resurrection of the dead in Daniel 12:1 “Now at that time (i.e. the “end time” Daniel 11:27, 35, 40) Michael, the great prince who stands guard over the sons of your people, will arise. And there will be a time of distress such as never occurred since there was a nation until that time; and at that time your people, everyone who is found written in the book, will be rescued. And many of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will awake, these to everlasting life, but the others to disgrace and everlasting contempt.” Daniel says that this resurrection would occur at the “end time” (12:4, 9, 12) at the “end of the age” (12:13, i.e. the end of the Jewish Age in 70 AD). He said this would occur at the “abomination of desolation” (12:11; also predicted by Daniel in Daniel 9:27). Jesus said that the abomination of desolation as predicted by Daniel had to occur within the generation of those whom he was talking to. Matthew 24:15 “Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place—let the reader understand— 16 then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains. 34 Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.” The word for “generations” is genea and in the NT it always means a period of about 40 years or the people living in a 40 years period, just as we use the word when we speak of the “baby boomers’ generation, or x generation”. Thus Jesus is saying that Daniel’s abomination of desolation had to happen within the next 40 years of when he made that statement, and that could only be the destruction of the temple and the city by the Romans in 70 AD. Tie all this together, and Daniel was predicting a resurrection of the dead that would happen at the end of the Jewish age and at the abomination of desolation of the temple in 70 AD. It is noteworthy that Paul said in Acts 24:15 that there “is about to be” a resurrection of the dead” just as the prophets predicted. The Greek word for “about to be” is mello which in the NT always means something “about to happen”. I quoted from YLT b/c it is about the only one that translates the word mello correctly. Most translation translate it as “certainly will be”, but that is incorrect. So, unless Paul is mistaken, the resurrection of the dead was “about to happen” at the time he spoke. That would have to be the Daniel 12:2 prediction of the resurrection of the dead.

Let that sink in! Paul said the resurrection was “about to happen” as he spoke. This could only be the Daniel 12:2 resurrection at the end of the Jewish Age in 70 AD. There was only one future resurrection and that was it in 70 AD. So why has Christian tradition taught for 2,000 years that the resurrection of the dead has not happened yet? Probably b/c Christians expected a resurrection of physical bodies from the graves, which indeed did not happen in 70 AD. There was a spiritual resurrection of the OT dead who were in hades, but not a bodily resurrection visible to the naked eye. They had been held in hades waiting their resurrection and final eternal sentence and fate. No one would have actually seen them rising from their graves in 70 AD. Another factor is that most Bible scholars believe that the 2nd coming hasn’t happened yet. They believe that the resurrection will happen at the 2nd coming, so the two doctrines become tied together.

Full preterism teaches that the 2nd coming was in 70 AD so that fits with the resurrection of the dead in 70 AD, both happening in 70 AD. Concerning the timing of the 2nd coming, Jesus only made in the synoptics 4 predictions of a 2nd coming or coming back: Matthew 10:23; 16:27-28; 24:30-34; 26:64. All 4 times he says that his 2nd coming would be within the lifetime of those he was speaking to. Matthew 16:27 even uses the word mello which always in the NT means “about to happen”: 27 “For, the Son of Man is about to come in the glory of his Father, with his messengers, and then he will reward each, according to his work.” He then adds: 28 Verily I say to you, there are certain of those standing here who shall not taste of death till they may see the Son of Man coming in his reign.’ He is saying that some of those he is speaking to will be alive at his 2nd coming. This prediction is not a prediction of the transfiguration as some say it is. The passage is a judgment passage, and there was no judgment at the transfiguration. Then in Matthew 24, the context is the abomination of desolation (24:15) of the temple in 70 AD. The “tribulation” (24:21,29) is the tribulation predicted by Daniel to fall on the Jews as the Romans sieged Jerusalem, killing a million Jews. Daniel 12:1 And there will be a time of distress such as never occurred since there was a nation until that time.” Then “immediately after that tribulation surrounding 70 AD, Jesus predicts his 2nd coming. Matthew 24:29 “But immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from the sky, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. 30 And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky with power and great glory.” Then he adds in Matthew 24:34 Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.” Again, the word generation always in the NT means a period of about 40 years or the people living in a 40 year period. So a clear prediction that his 2nd coming would be in the next 40 years after he said this. It is described with some figurative language, such as the stars falling. That is typical of figurative language used of the fall of Babylon (Isaiah 13) and other nations in the OT. It is not predicting that the stars would literally fall. These predictions by Jesus of an imminent 2nd coming within the lifetime of those he was speaking to could only be fulfilled by his coming in judgement on the Jews in 70 AD (using the Romans). There are no other predictions of a “coming back” of Jesus that were not to be fulfilled in the lifetime of those he was speaking to. Check it out. Find the verses that teaches another coming of Jesus (thus a 3rd coming) that was not imminent. There are none. That also fits the teaching of the apostles who taught an imminent 2nd coming of Jesus. Revelation is about the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD and is a prediction of the 2nd coming: Revelation 1:Behold, He is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of the earth will mourn over Him.” But then it says that he is coming soon or quickly: Revelation 22:And he said to me, “These words are faithful and true”; and the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent His angel to show His bond-servants the things which must soon take place. “And behold, I am coming quickly. 10 And he *said to me, “Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is near. 11 Let the one who does wrong still do wrong, and the one who is filthy still be filthy; and let the one who is righteous still practice righteousness, and the one who is holy still keep himself holy.” 12 “Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to reward each one as his work deserves. 20 He who testifies to these things says, “Yes, I am coming quickly.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.” Some want to say that “quickly” just means rapidly, but the context shows that means a coming that is “soon”. Some say, “Yes Jesus and the apostles predicted his 2nd coming to be imminent but then Jesus delayed his 2nd coming (now a 2,000 year delay!)” But Hebrews refutes that: Hebrews 10:37 For yet in a very little while, He who is coming will come, and will not delay.” James taught an imminent 2nd coming: James 5:You too be patient; strengthen your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is near.” Peter said in 1 Peter 4:The end of all things is near“. He is predicting the end of the Jewish system in 70 AD and not the end of the world. He follows that up with 2 Peter 3 a prediction of the removal of the old heavens and earth (the old covenantJewish system) and replacing them with the new heavens and earth (the new covenant system) that occured at 70 AD. If 2 Peter 3 was not fulfilled in 70 AD, then his prediction in 1 Peter 4:7 is false and the end of all things was not near. In 2 Thessalonians 2 Paul says that the 2nd coming would happen during the lifetime of the Thessalonian believers. Thus full preterism fulfills both the 2nd coming and the resurrection occurring in 70 AD.

Back to the discussion of the resurrection of the dead in 70 AD, Paul made it very clear that the resurrected bodies would be spiritual, not physical, in 1 Corinthians 15:42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is raised an imperishable body43 it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; 44 it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body.” He then. says that resurrection would occur while some of those he was writing to were still alive. 51 Behold, I am telling you a mystery; we will not all sleep, but we will all be changed, 52 in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet; for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed.” That is consistent with what he predicted in Acts 24:15, and can only refer to a resurrection of the dead in 70 AD just as Daniel 12:2 predicted. It is noteworthy that Paul adds that, whether dead of alive, all the believers will receive immortality at that resurrection in 70 AD. The last enemy, spiritual death, was officially defeated when the temple was destroyed in 70 AD and the law “disappeared” (Hebrews 8:13). There have been no more animal sacrifices or priesthood or temple since 70 AD.

Spiritual death has been defeated for believers. After 70 AD, believers get an immortal spiritual body when they are saved and that immortal body will live on eternally even after they die physically. John 11:23 Jesus *said to her, “Your brother will rise from the dead.” 24 Martha *said to Him, “I know that he will rise in the resurrection on the last day.” 25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life; the one who believes in Me will live, even if he dies, 26 and everyone who lives and believes in Me will never die.” Martha’s comment about a resurrection on the last day (of the age at the end time) reflects most Jewish expectations of a resurrection, but Jesus is teaching that the resurrection of the dead will give a believer a spiritual body that will continue to live even after physical death.

In Matthew 22:23-33 the Sadducees were trying to trap Jesus on his teaching of a resurrection of the dead (the which they denied). They posed the Levirate marriage law of a brother marrying his deceased brother’s wife if the deceased brother had no children. Matthew 22:23 On that day some Sadducees (who say there is no resurrection) came to [p]Jesus and questioned Him, 24 saying, “Teacher, Moses said, ‘If a man dies having no children, his brother as next of kin shall marry his wife, and raise up children for his brother.’ 25 Now there were seven brothers among us; and the first married and died, and having no children, he left his wife to his brother. 26 It was the same also with the second brother, and the third, down to the seventh. 27 Last of all, the woman died. 28 In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife of the seven will she be? For they all had her in marriage.” Jesus’ answer is interesting. 29 But Jesus answered and said to them, “You are mistaken, since you do not understand the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. 31 But regarding the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was spoken to you by God: 32 ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” 33 When the crowds heard this, they were astonished at His teaching”. This silenced the Sadducees (22:34) but I doubt they understood what Jesus said. But do we understand what he said? Most Bible scholars would say that the “resurrection of the dead” Jesus spoke of hasn’t happened yet, but that contradicts Daniel 12:2, Acts 24:15, and 1 Corinthians 15:51. The resurrection of the dead that Jesus spoke of in Matthew 22 was the same as in those verses and occurred in 70 AD. It would be a spiritual event, and thus no “marrying or giving in marriage”. Receiving immortality in 70 AD was not something physical like marriage. That is similar language as that used by Paul in Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” Of course there are male and female Christians, but he is speaking of a spiritual reality where believers have spiritual immortal bodies that have nothing to do with one’s gender of male or female. It is not about our marital state either, which is what Jesus was talking about. So the. resurrection Jesus is telling the Sadducees about is no doubt the Daniel 12:2 resurrection of the dead in 70 AD and not some future resurrection.

So my conclusion is that the Daniel 12:2, Acts 24:15, and 1 Corinthians 15:51 resurrection of the dead occurred in 70 AD when the OT dead in hades were raised to receive their eternal sentencing and when the believers living in 70 AD received immortality. From 70 AD on, all believers at their conversion fo Christ receive a resurrected spiritual body that will live eternally even after physical death. Paul spoke of this resurrected spiritual body in Ephesians 2, that we are raised from the dead spiritually to sit with Christ in the heavenly places. When we die, our spiritual immortal body goes directly to be with Jesus forever. There is no need for us to come back for some judgement day and some physical body to be raised from our graves. We already have all the immortal body that we need without that. Most preachers say that a deceased believer goest directly to be with Jesus, but then they still say that believer needs to come back some day, be judged, and his/her physical body be raised from the dirt. That is so inconsistent.

But isn’t it heresy to say that the resurrection of the dead has already happened in 70 AD? Did Paul not call that heresy? 2 Timothy 2: “17 Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, 18 men who have gone astray from the truth, claiming that the resurrection has already taken place; and they are jeopardizing the faith of some.” That was written by Paul in about 65 AD. The resurrection that would happen in 70 AD would not have happened yet when Paul wrote 2 Timothy. These two false teachers were saying in 65 AD that the resurrection had already happened, which it had not. Their teaching could really confuse believers about the fulfillment of prophecies as made by Paul and the other NT writers. So Paul calls it “going astray from the truth”. But we are living beyond 70 AD and the resurrection of the dead has indeed already happened some 2,000 years go. So it is not heresy to say today that the resurrection had already happened. The passages discussed in this article show that it has already happened. It could be considered straying from the truth to say that it has not already happened since the Bible says that it has.

I don’t believe that one’s view of the resurrection of the dead or 2nd coming is a heaven/hell issue. The only thing that matters is belief that Jesus is the Son of God, the only propitiation and atonement for our sins by his death on the cross, belief that he was raised from the dead, and following Christ through love, obedience to the moral commands of the New Testament. It is comforting to know that we already have our resurrected bodies and will go directly to be with Jesus when we die. It is edifying to know that all the predictions of Jesus, the prophets, and the apostles came true just as they were predicted. That gives us confidence in the Bible as the word of God, not men. 1 Thessalonians 2:13 For this reason we also constantly thank God that when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of mere men, but as what it really is, the word of God, which also is at work in you who believe.”

FOR YOU TYPE A PEOPLE! AND ME!

I don’t know why I do blogs when I copy so much from others! But I read Chuck Swindoll today and what he said really hit home. So, quuoting:

Humble yourselves, therefore, under the mighty hand of God, that He may exalt you at the proper time, casting all your anxiety upon Him because He cares for you. (1 Peter 5:6–7)

“I When we do that, He trades us His joy for our anxiety. Such a deal! As He then works things out and makes it clear to us which step to take next, we can relax, release the tension, and laugh again.

This is extremely hard for Type A personalities. If you happen to be more intelligent than the average person, it’s even more difficult. And if you are the super-responsible, I-can-handle-it individual who tends to be intense and impatient, letting go and letting God take charge will be one of life’s most incredible challenges. But I urge you, do it! Force yourself to trust Another who is far more capable and intelligent and responsible than you (or a thousand like you) ever could be. And in the meantime, enjoy!”

I think I am that type A person described in that last paragraph (not so sure about the more intelligent part). Are you that type A? My wife is just the opposite. Opposites attract, I suppose. Batteries work off a positive and negative. Two positive terminals touching would cause a short and problems. We have been making it work for 54 years now! We haven’t exploded yet!

There is a connection in 1 Peter 5:6-7 between “humbling yourself” and “casting your anxiety upon Him”. I tend to want to cast my anxiety and stress on Him and yet I don’t always humble myself when I do. In other words, I still in the back of my mind am holding on to my ability to control outcomes. I don’t totally admit that I have no control over outcomes. I don’t totally submit my will to God’s will. I don’t admit that I am totally incapable of controlling outcomes. In other words, I don’t really humble myself. Peter said that I must humble myself before casting my anxiety on Him.

I am going to try to humble myself first, and then cast my anxiety on Him. I want to trade my anxiety for His joy. I want to “laugh again”, to be happier. I need to be more patient, to take things in stride without getting upset. What about you other Type A people out there?

WORRY, STRESS, AND FEAR

Chuck Swindoll said that worry, stress, and fear are the thieves that rob us of our joy. I have personally been robbed many times by these 3 bandits. I struggle with all 3. The Holy Spirit tries to counsel me with scripture. 1 Peter 5:7:“Cast all your anxiety on him, because he cares for you.” Hebrews 13:5b-6:“…for he has said, ‘I will never leave you nor forsake you.’ So we can confidently say, ‘The Lord is my helper; I will not fear what man can do to me.'” 2 Timothy 1:7:“For God has not given us a spirit of fear and timidity, but a spirit of power, love, and self-discipline.” Philippians 4:6-7:“Do not be anxious about anything, but in every situation, by prayer and thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.” The Spirit of God is everywhere, so I try to feel His presence and hear His gentle voice counseling me to get rid of my worry, stress, and fear, but often that doesn’t help me. Why not? Probably b/c of my lack of faith and my shallow relationship with God and with the Spirit of God.

So what will help me? I know that when I am stressed out over something, I will go to my wife and she will say, “don’t even think about that; everything is going to be fine; quit worrying about that”. She might even give me a reason that I should not be worried. That helps me even if I’m not sure about her reason! I trust her emotions and faith more than I do my own.

Why can’t I turn to Jesus and listen to him telling me not to worry or stress out or be afraid? We read what Jesus said about these 3 things, but we tend to forget that he always gave counseling on these things as he was talking to his followers. They were having a panic attack in the middle of a storm at sea. Jesus asked the apostles, “Why are you so afraid? Do you still have no faith?”. They were afraid as the time for his crucifixion was about to happen. Jesus told them, John 14:27:“Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid.” He was addressing the multitude but also this disciples in Matthew 6:25 “For this reason I say to you, do not be worried about your life, as to what you will eat or what you will drink; nor for your body, as to what you will put on. Is life not more than food, and the body more than clothing? 26 Look at the birds of the sky, that they do not sow, nor reap, nor gather crops into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more important than they? 27 And which of you by worrying can add a single day to his life’s span? 28 And why are you worried about clothing? Notice how the lilies of the field grow; they do not labor nor do they spin thread for cloth29 yet I say to you that not even Solomon in all his glory clothed himself like one of these. 30 But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which is alive today and tomorrow is thrown into the furnace, will He not much more clothe you? You of little faith! 31 Do not worry then, saying, ‘What are we to eat?’ or ‘What are we to drink?’ or ‘What are we to wear for clothing?’ 32 For the Gentiles eagerly seek all these things; for your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. 33 But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be provided to you. 34 “So do not worry about tomorrow; for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”

If Jesus were sitting right in front of me on my couch right now, I think his words would, at least temporarily, remove all my worry, stress, and fear; just as my wife’s words help me. So the secret is to have such a relationship with Him that I can feel him sitting with me, talking to me, counseling me. That requires faith, b/c we walk by faith and not sight (2 Corinthians 5:7). When I panic, he is probably asking me the same question that the asked the apostles during the storm at sea, “”Why are you so afraid? Do you still have no faith?”. The secret is to feel His presence! As long as I can hear him say, “everything is going to be good; don’t worry; don’t be afraid”, then that’s all I need to hear. But it takes faith and a personal relationship with Him to sense him looking at me and saying thsee things to me.

Can you relate to any of this? I wrote this article for me. I get tired of all he worry, stress, and fear that I carry with me all the time. Those 3 things rob me of the joy and peace that Jesus brings to me. Christians should be the happiest people of earth. Isaiah 35: 10 “And the redeemed of the Lord will return
and come to Zion with joyful shouting; and everlasting joy will be on their heads. They will obtain gladness and joy, and sorrow and sighing will flee away.” This verse is describing those redeemed by the Messiah when he came. It is talking about the redeemed here on earth. They might cry and be sad, but inside they spiritual everlasting joy and peace. Or at least they should. Pew Research Center says that actively religious people are more likely than their less-religious peers to describe themselves as “very happy”. That’s good. But then it adds, “36% of the actively religious describe themselves as “very happy,” compared with 25% of the inactively religious.” So only a little over a third of active Christians describe themselves as “very happy”. A little better 11% better than the inactive religious people, but still only 1 out of every 3 active Christians (i.e. those who go to church, who profess a sincere faith in Jesus) are very happy. What about the other 2/3????? They are active religiously. They probably go to church regularly. They listen to sermons and attend Bible classes, but the other 2/3 are not “very happy”. Yet we have been blessed with so many material blessings in this country. Most of us have money, nice homes, medical insurance, plenty of food, cars, income, etc. But not “very happy”. You take a short mission trip overseas as one of our student groups just did to Ghana, Africa. They have very little but they are happy in the Lord. Their joy is obvious. They are not stressed out and worried about material things. They have that everlasting joy that many of us Christians do not have.

Let’s work on it, what do you say? Jesus, talk to me! Holy Spirit, move me! Father, comfort me!

PAUL WAS AN INSPIRED APOSTLE!

One of my former Bible students came by school and made a comment that we don’t have to follow the teachings and commands of Paul. The student said that we only have to follow the “red letters”, i.e. the teachings and commands of Jesus. I knew where he was going with that comment. He said that Jesus did not condemn homosexuality. He said that Paul was just homophobic and that Paul’s opinions were just his personal opinions and not binding on us today.

Galatians becomes a critical letter for us today as we face the LGBQT issues that seem to be splitting churches right and left. The Judaizers in Galatia were trying to undermine Paul’s authority as an apostle. Their issue in Galatia was not LGBQT but instead was Judaizer forcing Gentile converts to be circumcised as was required of Jews under the Law of Moses. No doubt they pointed out that Paul was not one of the original 12 apostles, which was true. Even Paul admitted that he was the last of the apostles. 1 Corinthians 15:and last of all, as to one untimely born, He appeared to me also. For I am the least of the apostles, and not fit to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.” Jesus appeared to him on the road to Damascus about 6 years after the death of Jesus, thus qualifying him to be an apostle. But in the 2nd Corinthian letter, he made it clear that he was not inferior to any of he other original 12 apostles in authority. 2 Corinthians 11:For I consider myself not in the least inferior to the most eminent apostles.” 12:Actually I should have been commended by you, since I was in no respect inferior to the most eminent apostles, even though I am a nobody. 12 The distinguishing marks of a true apostle were performed among you with all perseverance, by signs, wonders, and miracles.”

In the letter to the Galatians he defends his apostleship vigorously. In chapter 1 he argued that he received his gospel message (in which he did not make Gentile converts be circumcised) directly from Jesus and not from the other apostles. He makes it clear that he only went to Jerusalem 3 years after his conversion and only stayed 15 days, not nearly enough time to get a school of preaching training from the other apostles! Maybe some Judaizers were claiming that Paul got his teachings from the apostles but didn’t get some teachings on circumcision of Gentile converts correctly. But Paul is adamant that he did not get his gospel from the other apostles in any way. In chapter 2 he then stated that he did not go to Jerusalem again util 14 years later when he attended the Jerusalem Council in 50 AD to discuss the issue of Gentile converts being circumcised. He boldly states that Peter, James (the Lord’s brother), and John were the pillars of the Jerusalem. church but that he did not yield to them on the issue even for an hour. He said that their reputation as the apostles and leaders of the church meant nothing to him. He added that he even opposed the apostle Peter to his face when Peter was influenced by a group of men coming from James in Jerusalem to Antioch in Syria telling the Jewish Christians in Antioch to not eat with the Gentile Christians. BTW that’s pretty strange, if Peter was the first pope, that Paul would be rebuking the pope! It is obvious that Paul is claiming to have the same authority as the other apostles.

If Paul was a true apostle, which he was, then his teachings were inspired by the Spirit and infallible (without error). He is not just giving his uninspired opinions on issues. He was giving teachings inspired b by the Spirit. The apostle Peter even called Paul’s writings “Scripture”, giving them equal authority to the inspired writings of the Old Testament. 2 Peter 3:15 and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation; just as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, 16 as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which there are some things that are hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.” Surely no one would question the apostleship of Peter, and yet Peter claims that Paul’s writings were inspired Scripture.

Back to the critical LGBQT issue. Paul clearly says that homosexuality is a sin. Romans 1:26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged natural relations for that which is contrary to nature, 27 and likewise the men, too, abandoned natural relations with women and burned in their desire toward one another, males with males committing shameful acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.” 1 Corinthians 6:Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor those habitually drunk, nor verbal abusers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.” The Greek word for homosexuals is arsenokoites: Homosexual, sodomite. The same word is used in 1 Timothy 1: 10 for the sexually immoral, homosexuals, slave traders, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching.” I once talked with a minister of a church that accepted homosexual members and marriages. He argued that the Greek word for homosexual in these passages did not mean homosexual. Every Greek lexicon confirms that it does mean homosexual. If that isn’t enough, Romans 1 makes it even clearer without relying on Greek words.

The authority of Paul as an apostle is a critical issue today and we must defend his apostleship just as he did 2,000 years ago in the Galatian and Corinthian letters. The LGBQT issue should be easily resolved if we accept the inspiration of Paul’s writings. Those who reject Paul’s apostleship and authority do so without any proof or reasonable argument. They do so simply b/c they don’t like what he said about homosexuality.

One last point. One of the qualifications of an apostles was that one had to see the resurrected Jesus. Acts 1:22 beginning with the baptism of John until the day that He was taken up from us—one of these must become a witness with us of His resurrection.” Paul was not with Jesus for the 3 years like the other apostles, but he argues that he did indeed see the resurrected Jesus. 1 Corinthians 9:1 Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are you not my work in the Lord? If I am not an apostle to others, at least I am to you; for you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord.” The resurrected Jesus appearing to Saul on the road to Damascus is one of the biggest proofs of the resurrection of Jesus. There is nothing else that could have changed Saul from persecuting, even killing, Jewish Christians except that he saw the resurrected Jesus. Jewish Christians were terrified of Saul and would not have dared to try to convert him. Seeing the resurrected Jesus qualified him to be an apostle even though he was not with Jesus the 3 years that the other apostles were with Him.

The church should be the “pillar and ground of the truth”. Paul said in 1 Timothy 3:14 I am writing these things to you, hoping to come to you before long; 15 but in case I am delayed, I write so that you will know how one should act in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth.” It is not surprising for atheists and agnostics to argue that Paul was not an apostle, but it is shocking for churches like some of the Methodist churches (and other denominations before that) arguing that his writings against homosexuality are not inspired. If even believers reject Paul’s writings, what hope is there to convert the unbelieving world who question the authority of the Bible as the word of God? I shudder to think what Jesus must feel about the direction some of the churches are going in. I also wonder how many millions of dollars are collected to support the staff and buildings of churches that reject Paul’s teaching on homosexuality. I believe Jesus would be turning some tables over if he were to make an appearance to the churches in the U.S.

 

AM I BECOME YOUR ENEMY BY TELLING YOU THE TRUTH?

Galatians 4:16 So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?” Paul said this to the Galatian Christians after scolding them. He began his letter to them in 1:“I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel, which is not just another account; but there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ.” There are none of the commendations for them as found in Colossians or several of his other letters. He is amazed at how quickly they followed the Judaizer false teachers who were saying that Gentile converts had to be circumcised. He says that they had been “bewitched” in 3:1 “You foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified?” The Greek is baskaínō (from baskanos, “to cast an evil spell, wishing injury upon someone; to bewitch”) – properly, to exercise evil power over someone, like putting them under a spell.” He challenges them: “did you receive the miraculous indwelling of the Spirit by the hearing of faith (Paul would have been the one who taught, baptized them and laid his hands on them to give them the Spirit and miraculous gifts) or by the works of the Law (as was being promoted by the Judaizers). Who gave you the miraculous, me or the Judaizers”?

He fears that all his work with converting and maturing them has been in vain. 4: “However at that time, when you did not know God, you were slaves to those which by nature are not gods. But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how is it that you turn back again to the weak and worthless elementary principles, to which you want to be enslaved all over again? 10 You meticulously observe days and months and seasons and years. 11 I fear for you, that perhaps I have labored over you in vain.” In other words, “I fear that I have wasted precious time working with you Galatians. I helped free you from the slavery of your pagan god laws and yet now you are allowing the Judaizers to make you a slave to rituals from the Law of Moses that you aren’t required to keep.” That’s pretty bold and harsh.

He reminds them of how they received him so fondly when he first converted them. Maybe his thorn was bad eyesight and they could have looked at Paul with contempt, but instead they would have torn out their own eyes and given them to Paul. Their relationship with him was such a blessing, and yet now they are turning on Paul. But it is not Paul, but Christ, that they are turning on. 4:12 I beg of you, brothers and sisters, become as I am, for I also have become as you are. You have done me no wrong; 13 but you know that it was because of a bodily illness that I preached the gospel to you the first time; 14 and you did not despise that which was a trial to you in my bodily condition, nor express contempt, but you received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus Himself15 Where then is that sense of blessing you had? For I testify about you that, if possible, you would have torn out your eyes and given them to me.” Paul is saying, “what made you listen to the Judaizers and turn on me?”

He gets pretty strong with them. 4:19 My children, with whom I am again in labor until Christ is formed in you— 20 but I could wish to be present with you now and to change my tone of voice, for I am at a loss about you!” The Greek for “at a loss” is the term ἀπορέω. It is used in the New Testament to describe a state of perplexity or confusion, often in the context of not knowing what to do or how to proceed. In other words, “I don’t know what to do with you”. It sound like something you would say to your wild, disobedient teenage child after many incidents getting in trouble!

He tells them this it is fine if they want to be circumcised, but if they do it as a test of fellowship as promoted by the Judaizers then they will fall from grace. 5:Look! I, Paul, tell you that if you have yourselves circumcised, Christ will be of no benefit to you. And I testify again to every man who has himself circumcised, that he is obligated to keep the whole Law. You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by the Law; you have fallen from grace.” Circumcision was not a heaven/hell issue, but if someone makes it a heaven/hell issue and withdraws from those who aren’t circumcised, then that becomes a major issue. It means that the one making it a test of fellowship is no longer trusting the grace of God and is trusting the keeping of Laws instead of trusting God’s grace that allows freedom in non essential issues. Wow! The church I was raised in did that all the time. They made issues like instrumental music or kitchens in the church building (and many other issues) to be heaven/hell issues and withdrew from other Christians and denominations who disagreed with them. I even remember hearing our preachers condemn the denominations for using instrumental music (and other things), accusing them of “perverting the gospel of Christ”. They quote 1:6-9 saying the denominations were preaching a “different gospel”. But those whom Paul condemned for preaching a different gospel were the Judaizers who were making circumcision (a non heaven/hell issue) a test of fellowship with other Christians. So it was our preachers who, by making instrumental music a test of fellowship, were the ones preaching a different gospel!!!!!!! It took me a long time to figure that out!

He wants to know who has hindered them from full obedience to the gospel. 5:You were running well; who hindered you from obeying the truth? This persuasion did not come from Him who calls you.” It certainly wasn’t the Christ Jesus who called them by the gospel of grace, not the legalism of the Law. Apparently the Judaizers had caused a lot of internal strife among the Galatian Christians. 5:15 But if you bite and devour one another, take care that you are not consumed by one another.” I have seen many churches be divided and split over non heaven/hell issues like having kitchens in the building or using money from the treasury to support orphan homes. We are talking knock down, drag out. battles between members. Ugly, ugly church splits. Is that what was happening in their churches?

So back to Galatians 4:16 So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?” He has been pretty blunt and harsh with them. He isn’t sure how they will respond to his sharp criticism. Will they side with the Judaizers and turn even further away from Paul? Will they listen to the Judaizers as they challenge the apostleship of Paul (which he defends vigorously in chapters 1 and 2)?

I just talked to a wonderful Christian lady from Trinidad, West Indies whom we baptized and matured during our 3 years of mission work there. She made me feel so good bragging on how we planted the churches in Trinidad that are still doing well 50 years later. I can’t imagine if the conversation had been such as Paul had with his Galatian converts. What if she had told me that some preachers from the U.S. had been to Trinidad and had convinced her that we were false teachers 50 years ago? What if I could tell that she no longer respected the work we did with them 50 years ago? Can you imagine how crushed that conversation would have been to me?????

Can you imagine how Paul felt about the negative attitude he was hearing about from his Galatian converts? We don’t even know how he found out about what was going on in the Galatian churches. Sadly, we don’t know how they responded to his letter. We are not even sure when he wrote the letter. Where was he when he wrote it? If Galatians 2 is about Paul going to Jerusalem for the conference in Acts 15 to settle the issue of Gentile converts being circumcised, then the letter had to be written after 50 AD (the date of the conference). That would mean the letter was written between 50 and 60 AD. Paul likely wrote his Epistle to the Galatians while traveling through Macedonia during his third missionary journey in about A.D. 55–57. If so, then he would not have been able to visit the Galatians to confront them in person since his 3rd journey ended as a prisoner in Jerusalem before going to Rome as a prisoner. That would make sense that he would write a letter to them. He probably never got to go visit them again even after he got out of Roman imprisonment during his last journey to Crete, Ephesus, and Miletus before he was arrested and faced his final imprisonment in Rome before being beheaded.

So, sometimes you need to tell people the truth even if it hurts their feelings or if it could strain your relationship with them. “You need to start using deodorant!” A true friend will tell his friend that. “You need to quit hanging around with those people.” “You need to quit having sex with your boyfriend.” “You need to get out of that legalistic church that you are in.” “You need to quit lying to your parents.” “You need to quit having that affair on your mate.” Need I go on? Proverbs 27:6 “Faithful are the wounds of a friend, But deceitful are the kisses of an enemy.” Someone said that “unsolicited advice” is like “butting into someone’s personal business”. I guess it is. But if you really care about them, you will butt in and tell them what they need to hear! Paul kinda addresses that in Galatians 6:1 “Brothers and sisters, even if a person is caught in any wrongdoing, you who are spiritual are to restore such a person in a spirit of gentleness; each one looking to yourself, so that you are not tempted as well.” He is telling those who are “spiritual” to back him up with his criticism of some of their less spiritual brethren and sisters.

Yes, you should tell them in love the blunt things that they need to hear. Do it in private if possible. Let them know you care. Let them know that you also have sins and weaknesses. Use “I” statements to express your feelings and observations without blaming or accusing your friend. For example, instead of saying “You’ve been so down lately,” you could say “I’ve noticed you seem down, and I’m worried about you.” But the bottom line is to tell them what they need to hear even if it hurts their feelings or embarrasses them or makes them mad at you or makes them defensive. If you love them you will tell them!

THE MILLENNIUM OF REVELATION 20: 40 YEARS!

Here are the facts from Revelation 20 on the millennium, the 1,000 years. Read the chapter.

  1. Satan was bound in some way for 1,000 years. He was not allowed to deceive the nations for that period of time.
  2. After the 1,000 years is completed Satan is released but only for a short time.
  3. Those martyred for their faith in Jesus come to life and reign with Christ for 1,000 years. Their coming to life is the “first resurrection”.
  4. The “rest of the dead” don’t come to life till the end of. the 1,000 years. They will be given the second death.
  5. At the end of the 1,000 years Satan will be released for a short time to deceive the nations (20:3 said he could not do that for the 1,000 years).
  6. The nations are called God and Magog from Ezekiel 38-39 where Gog (the leader of the land of Magog) and Magog (the land) will attack Israel in the “latter years” (38:8). Ezekiel said this had been prophesied by “God’s servants the prophets of Israel” (38:17). He says that God and Magog will be defeated and destroyed. He says that God then will pour out His Spirit on the house of Israel (Ezekiel 39:29).
  7. Gog and Magog “surround the camp of the saints and the beloved city” but Gog and Magog are devoured by fire (Revelation 20:9).
  8. The devil is thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone.
  9. There is then a great white throne judgement. Heavens and earth pass away. Death and Hades give up their dead to be judged. Death and Hades are then thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone which is the 2nd death.

I remind you that Revelation is predicting things that are near, to shortly take place (Revelation 1:1-3; 22:6-10). Thus we expect chapter 20 to take place shortly also. The key is #7 above. At the end of the 1,000 years Gog and Magog surround the “beloved city” and the “saints”. The beloved city would have to Jerusalem, so this would refer to the Romans (God and Magog) sieging Jerusalem in 70 AD, destroying the temple and the city. The saints attacked would be the Jews, God’s people of the old testament. Ezekiel said that the prophets had predicted God and Magog and indeed several prophets predicted the destruction of Jerusalem by the “nations” (the Romans) in 70 AD (Joel 3; Zechariah 14; Deuteronomy 30; Daniel 9,12).

Notice that #7 takes place at the end of the 1,000 years (#5). The end of the 1,000 years must be 70 AD. Therefore the 1,000 years must be the 40 year period from 30 AD (when the gospel was preached to the whole Roman Empire, the church was established, and Christians began to be martyred for their faith in Jesus) to 70 AD. The martyred saints during that period would receive their resurrected bodies (the 1st resurrection) spiritually and reign with Jesus in heaven during that period. The “rest of the dead” would be those who died in the Old Testament and were held in Hades waiting for their eternal fate. They would be raised in 70 AD just as Daniel 12:2 predicted would happen at the “end of the age” (i.e. the end of the Jewish age in 70 AD). The wicked would be raised spiritually to receive their fate, the 2nd death of fire and brimstone.

The pouring out of the Spirit on Israel (Ezekiel 39:29) is often predicted by the prophets (Joel 2:28-32; Isaiah 44:3; Zechariah 12:10). That was also fulfilled during the “last days” of the Jewish Age from AD 30 to 70 AD as seen in the book of Acts. The “Israel” the Spirit was poured out on has to be the remnant of Jews who believed in Jesus as the Messiah and who became the first church in the book of Acts. The Spirit was not poured out on the whole nation. Instead God judged the wicked unbelieving Jews and sent the Romans to kill one million Jews in 70 AD. That was the great white throne judgment.

Satan is thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone at the end of the 1,000 years in 70 AD. I personally believe that means that Satan was thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone in 70 AD b/c that is what it says. That means that Satan is no longer allowed to roam the earth and deceive people after 70 AD. He is “toast”, either annihilated or burning forever. Evil would continue after 70 AD since evil is the result of our lusts (James 1) and Satan. is not some omnipotent being who personally induces every person on the earth to sin. Spiritual death is destroyed in. 70 AD. The last enemy Jesus conquered was spiritual death (1 Corinthians 15:26) and spiritual death would be destroyed when the Law, the source of death (1 Corinthians 15:56), was destroyed in 70 AD when the temple was destroyed, the Law was finally removed once and for all (Hebrews 8:13 it “disappeared” in 70 AD), and spiritual death is destroyed for every believer in Jesus from AD 70 forward. Hades, the waiting place of the Olld Testament dead, was also destroyed in 70 AD. There was no need for a “waiting place” any longer. After 70 AD Christians who die go directly to be with Jesus. They will live spiritually even if they die physically (John 11:25-26).

That, right or wrong, is about as short and through as I can make it. That means the 1,000 years (the millennium) ended in 70 AD. The number 1,000 is a figurative number just like many numbers in the book of Revelation. That means that Jesus is not coming back to set up a 1,000 year reign on earth in a. physical power based kingdom. Most evangelicals believe that and are waiting for Jesus to come set up an earthly kingdom. They believe the battle of Armageddon will happen at the end of the 1,000 years, but Armageddon in the book of Revelation happened in 70 AD when the Romans attacked Jerusalem. Jesus’s kingdom was a spiritual kingdom, the church, not of this world (John 18:36). So many predictions for the beginning of the 1,000 years have failed. Dispensationalists thought it would begin in the 7th millennium since the creation, which, if you beleive the earth was created about 4,000 BC, would begin in the year 2,000 AD. It did not. All the false expectations of a millennium happening in our future is just an unnecessary distraction to the preaching of the gospel and the glory that should be given to God in the church. When predictions of a future 2nd coming and millennium don’t come true, many might lose their faith in the Bible since they think the predictions failed to come true. Instead of rejecting those false prophets who made the false predictions, they reject the Bible itself.

These are the conclusions of my study of the millennium. Thanks for reading even if you disagree!