You might not enjoy an article about eschatology (the study of the end times). You might think that eschatology doesn’t even matter, which is probably true for most believers. But you might want to know more about it. You are confused by the constant predictions of end time events, none of which come true. In 1948 when Israel became a recognized state was that God fulfilling Old Testament predictions Israel that He would one day “restore their fortunes and give them back their land”? What about those verses in the Old Testament that predicted that God would “restore the fortunes of Israel and put them back on their land” (Jeremiah 30:3; Ezekiel 36-37)? Is that literal or could there be some figurative fulfillment of that?

There is a verse that kinda settles it all for me. It is found in what Jesus predicted in Luke 21:²⁰ “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is near. ²¹ Then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains, and those who are inside the city must leave, and those who are in the country must not enter the city; ²² because these are days of punishment, so that all things which have been written will be fulfilled. ²³ Woe to those women who are pregnant, and to those who are nursing babies in those days; for there will be great distress upon the land, and wrath to this people; ²⁴ and they will fall by the edge of the sword, and will be led captive into all the nations; and Jerusalem will be trampled underfoot by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.“

We know this is predicting the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple by the Romans in 70 AD. Luke 21:³² Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all things take place.” That verse makes it clear that the predictions of Luke 21 must be fulfilled within the lifetime of the generation of those he was speaking to. That word “generation” always refers to a period of about 40 years or to the people living withing a period of about 40 years. The same as we use it when we say the “baby boomers’ generation”, or “gen z”. The only event within that next generation that Jesus could be referring to was 70 AD.

But “the verse” that settles a lot of the confusion about Old Testament prophecies is found in Luke 21 in verse 21:²² because these are days of punishment, so that all things which have been written will be fulfilled.” Which have been written where? Since Luke 21 is predicting the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, that must refer to the Old Testament since the New Testament had not been written yet when Jesus spoke this. That means that all Old Testament predictions would be fulfilled by 70 AD. That means that Israel being restored to their fortunes and land had to be fulfilled by 70 AD. But you might object, “Israel was not restored to their power as a nation by 70 AD and they did not get all the Promised Land by 70 AD”, which is true. What that means is that those predictions were fulfilled figuratively, not literally. In Romans 9-11, Paul clearly says that all of God’s promises to Israel in the Old Testament did come true, but that those promises were only made for the remnant of Israel who would accept Jesus as the Messiah and not for the whole nation. The fate of most of the nation was to be judged and killed in 70 AD (Josephus said that one million Jews died). The fortunes of the remnant of believing Jews were restored spiritually with all the spiritual Messianic blessings of forgiveness and salvation. If not, Jesus is a false prophet for predicting that all Old Testament things that had been written would be fulfilled within that generation, in 70 AD.

Some say that all predictions must be taken literally, but no necessarily so. The Bible uses a lot of figurative language. The context determines if a prediction is to be taken literally or figuratively. Malachi predicted that Elijah would come before the day of the Lord, but that was fulfilled by the coming of John the Baptist and not literally by Elijah the prophet coming back from the dead. Jesus said it was fulfilled in John. So the original prediction had to be figurative. Another example is the kingdom of God that was to be established in the days of the 4th kingdom (the legs of iron) of Nebuchadnezzar’s statue in Daniel 2. The Jews expected the Messiah to restore the kingdom of Israel to its physical power as in the days of King David. But Jesus, in the days of the Roman Empire, said “the kingdom is at hand”. He also said that some of those he was speaking to would be alive to see him coming in his kingdom” (Mark 9:1; Matthew 16:27,28). So, unless he is a false prophet or mistaken, that kingdom had to be establish in the first century. A literal power oriented kingdom was not established, but a spiritual kingdom, the church, was established. Thus the prediction of the kingdom being established was fulfilled figuratively in the spiritual church that Jesus built.

That explains how Old Testament predictions of “restoring the fortunes of Israel and bringing them back to their land” could be fulfilled figuratively but only for the remnant of believing Jews. That might go against our normal way of interpreting Scripture, but we must accept figurative fulfillment of predictions when other verse demand it. Again, Luke 21:22 demands a figurative fulfillment of all of the predictions about the Messianic future of Israel, the “resotoration of the fortunes of Israel”, i.e. that is only refers to the remnant of Israel who accepted Jessu as the Messiah..

But notice Luke 21:²⁷ And then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.” This also had to be fulfilled within the generation of those Jesus was speaking to (21:32). So did Jesus come in 70 AD? Yes. If not, then Jesus is a false prophet or just mistaken. He only predicts a “2nd coming” or “coming back” (the parousia) 4 times in the synoptics (Matthew 10:23; 16:27,28; 24:29-34; 26:64 and the parallel readings in Mark 13 and Luke 21), and in all 4 times he predicts that 2nd coming to be within the lifetime of those he is speaking to. There are no predictions of a coming back after their lifetime. He did return in 70 AD to judge the nation that rejected him as the Messiah. If these predictions did not come true just as he predicted, then he is indeed a false prophet, which is what the atheists, Muslims, and unbelieving Jews claim. Most Christians just ignore these verses and say that Jesus’ 2nd coming is still in our future. Or they come up with some theory that Jesus delayed his 2nd coming, but there are no verses to support that. Instead, Hebrew 10:37 For yet in a very little while,
He who is coming will come, and will not delay.” That verse refutes any delayed coming theory!

Again, all this might not interest you at all. But surely you feel the pressure of being told that as a Christian you should believe in Israel and that God has a special place for Israel in eschatology? Or maybe you are just confused about it all and you don’t know what to believe or who to listen to? Or maybe you just don’t want to even discuss or study eschatology, which is fine. But someone needs to defend the Bible predictions in light of their misuse so often. I hope that is all that I am trying to do!

Thanks for reading if you made it this far!!!

In Swindoll’s Sept 2 “Insight For Living” he wrote: “Stay with the Scriptures. While our individual experiences may vary somewhat as the Lord uses each of us in unique ways, we must never—and I mean never—get too far from the revealed and reliable Word of God. If you do you will begin to use your experience as a basis for your beliefs, and the Scriptures will diminish in importance as you make more and more room for more strange experiences.”

“I have pastor friends who have done just that. And today when I talk with them, I find that they no longer believe that the Bible is God’s final Word. If that’s true, then how do I know where His Word starts and their vivid imagination stops? How much of it can I trust? No matter how persuasive the preacher, you and I need God’s inspired Word, not additional revelations of “truth.” When that happens, we are hopelessly awash.”

I teach “Christian Evidences” in my Bible classes, so the inspiration of the Word is a dear subject to me. It is true that we do not have the original writings of the apostles and prophets. But we do have thousands of manuscripts (copies) that help assure us that we have trustworthy translations today. It is true that there are “apparent contradictions” in the Word. But those can be explained if you give the Bible the “benefit of the doubt”. But today we hear more serious doubts about the inspiration of Scripture. Paul is considered to be just an uninspired man giving his homophobic, misogynistic opinions. Thus the LGBQT movement splits churches (the Methodist church and others). The inspired teachings of Paul are no longer the standard for determining right and wrong.

So they tell us that some parts of the Bible are inspired but that the false ideas of the writers are mixed in with the inspired portions. As Swindoll said, how can we determine which part is the actual word of God? Do we leave it to some uninspired preacher to tell us which parts of Scripture are “truth”?

I hope what Paul said of the Thessalonian Christians can be said of you. 1 Thessalonians 2:¹³ For this reason we also constantly thank God that when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of mere men, but as what it really is, the word of God, which also is at work in you who believe.”

I found this on AI when I googled “why are people losing faith in God?” “People leave belief in God due to factors like intellectual doubts, disillusionment with religious institutions’ values or actions (such as hypocrisy or scandals), negative experiences with religious trauma, evolving personal values that conflict with religious teachings, influence from a more secularizing society, and changing family structures that don’t reinforce religious beliefs. The decision is often a complex, personal journey driven by a combination of these societal, institutional, and individual factors.”

Very well stated. Look at each of those reasons given for why people lose faith in God. Surveys say that only 5% of people in the U.S. are atheists, but many more are agnostics (who don’t believe there is enough evidence to decide if there is a God or not) or skeptics (who doubt that there is a God b/c that defies science in their opinion).

So then I googled, “why are people leaving churches”? and this is what I got. “People are leaving the Churches of Christ, as well as other religious groups, due to various factors including disagreement with legalistic practices (like their stance on instrumental music), lack of community and connection, perceived irrelevance to modern society, disillusionment with leadership or institutional hypocrisy, and personal experiences of church hurt or abuse. Other reasons are broader, such as a general trend of secularization and the rise of individual spirituality, where people prefer to find meaning online or outside of traditional religious structures.” Again, a very accurate and complete list of reasons. I struggle greatly with institutional Christianity, the “big business churches” that spend 80% of their money collections on their buildings, staff, an on themselves. I am a house church advocate with no budgets, buildings, or paid preachers and staff (which is the way it was in the first church in Acts). Justin Martyr, 2nd century apologist, said that the only collections taken up were to help the poor, widows, orphans, or stuggling families in their number. I can certainly relate to those who leave their church b/c it is going LGBQT like with the Methodist church or b/c of some scandal of their pastor having an affair with some of his members. All the reasons listed about contribute to the fact that 30% of those surveys check “none” for their religous affiliation. Only 5% of those 30% are atheists and the rest are just disallusioned with institutional Christianity and have “quit church”. Maybe the church has let them down. Maybe if the churches were more into spending their money collected into drilling wells, helping the poor and oppressed, and printing Bibles to share the gospel all over the world, especially to unevangelized nations and peoples. Maybe if the churches were more into just connecting as a family rather than focusing on bands and preachers which draws a lot of people to megachurches (many of whom admittedly do a good job with small groups, community service, and children’s ministries). So the “nones” are no longer going to church to at least have Bible teaching and Christian fellowship. Many of them find their own spirituality in some way, even basic Christian faith, but often they do not teach their children the faith. It is easy for them to just become worldly minded, lacking the spiriutal disciplines of Bible study, prayer, fellowship, etc. Sunday is just another day to go the lake or watch football. Nothing wrong with that unless we are forsaking Christian fellowship.

So, are you a “none”? How solid is your faith in God and in Jesus as the Son of God, our savior, raised from the dead? If your faith getting stronger or weaker? Have you left your church? Is there some other way that you can join with other Christians in a house church or small group? Are you grounding your children in the faith at home with family Bible studies? Do you constantly talk to them about the existence of God and the design in the universe and in nature? Do you talk about God in the home as if He is real?

Something to think about.

1 Timothy 4:1  “But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, ² by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron, ³ who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth. ⁴ For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with gratitude; ⁵ for it is sanctified by means of the word of God and prayer.”

Paul is by the Spirit predicting some “apostasy”, a falling away from the faith. Paul also predicted this in 2 Thessalonians 2:1 “Now we ask you, brothers and sisters, regarding the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, ² that you not be quickly shaken from your composure or be disturbed either by a spirit, or a message, or a letter as if from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. ³ No one is to deceive you in any way! For it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, ⁴ who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God.”  

So Paul predicted some kind of “apostasy” (apostasia: Apostasy, rebellion, defection, falling away) before 70 AD. He could even be referring to the Jewish rebellion against Rome in 66-70 AD (one meaning of apostasia is “rebellion”) in 2 Thess 2:3. Or a spiritual apostasy. 1 Timothy 4 seems to be a spiritual apostasy where false teachers are making laws forbidding eating certain foods and forbidding marriage. Paul is very clear that Christians under the new covenant can eat anything, any animal, as long as they give thanks for it. I read one article that said that Paul was not saying that Christians can eat anyting, but that he was saying that some teachers were saying that Christians can’t eat the clean meats of Leviticus 11. That article said that Christians are still required to follow the meat laws of Leviticus, but I totally disagree with that. Those laws were given to the Jews, and only to the Jews. 1 Timothy 3:1-5 clearly says that Christians can eat anything that God created, and that includes eating any kind of meat, even the “unclean” meats forbidden for the Jews to eat in Leviticus 11. There are Christian groups like the 7th Day Adventists and the Worldwide Church of God that still follow the food laws of Leviticus 11. That’s fine, but they should not make that a heaven/hell issue for other believers.

The 2nd false teaching was the forbidding to marry. My research told me that the 2nd century church fathers suggested that celibacy would be better. They no doubt got this from 1 Corinthians 7 where Paul told the Corinthians to stay unmarried if they were not married, but he added that. was due to a “present distress” (persecution of Christians by the Jews or Rome). Obviously that is not a hard fast celibacy law for all ministers or priests. He even told them to marry if they were going to burn with lust if they did not marry. Some church fathers suggested that sex within marriage should only be for procreation, having children, and not for sexual enjoyment. But Paul in 1 Corinthians 7 told married partners not to withhold sex from their partners. The first official celibacy law was the Council of Elvira in 306 AD and it issued a decree for priests not to marry. The Western Church, the Roman Catholic church, eventually forbade priests from marrying, but the Eastern Church, the Orthodox church centered in Constantinople in the Byzantine Empire allowed their priests to marry. Bottom line, God never forbade marriage except on rare occasions (He told Jeremiah not to marry or have children in light of his “present distress” of the Jews going into Babylonian captivity very soon after he prophesied). Paul even told the younger widows in 1 Timothy 5:¹⁴ Therefore, I want younger widows to get married, have children, manage their households, and give the enemy no opportunity for reproach.” God wants us to marry if we so desire, to have children if we so desire, and enjoy sex within our marriages. If someone chooses not to marry, that is fine, but no one should make laws forbidding marriage like the Catholic Church has done with their priests. Or like the Shakers. The Christian Shakers were a religious group that practiced communal celibacy, believing that abstaining from sex was necessary to wage a spiritual war against the flesh. 

Be careful of any teachers who start making up laws that are not clearly taught in the New Covenant. Or teachers that make things to be heaven/hell doctrines when they are not.

Thanks for reading.

The only translation (if I am correct) that uses the word “science” is the KJV in Daniel 1:4 and 1 Timothy 6:20. Here is 1 Timothy 6:20 “O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called”. The Greek word is gnosis, which means knowledge, and that is how it is translated in most translations except the KJV. In the NASB 1 Timothy 6:²⁰ Timothy, protect what has been entrusted to you, avoiding worldly, empty chatter and the opposing arguments of what is falsely called “knowledge”. Even the NKJV translates it as “knowledge”. So why would the KJV translators translate it as “science”? “The KJV translators were heavily influenced by the Latin Vulgate, which used the Latin word “scientia” (related to “knowledge”) to translate “gnosis”. In the early 17th century, “science” in English encompassed a broader range of knowledge than it does today. It could refer to any kind of learning or knowledge, not just what we now call scientific fields.” (AI) So even in 1611 AD the word “science” in the KJV did not refer to science as we know it today, science based on empirical evidence through the scientific method.

So what is the “knowledge falsely so called” in 1 Timothy 6:20? It referred to some kind of “knowledge” that wasn’t Biblical based knowledge or Spirit inspired truth from inspired writers like Paul and the apostles. It would include “worldly, empty chatter and opposing arguments” to the truth. It would include “myths and endless genealogies and speculation” (1 Timothy 1:4). It would include “forbidding marriage and advocating abstaining from certain foods” (1 Timothy 4:3). It would include “worthless stories typical of old women” (1 Timothy 4:7). It would include “controversial questions and disputes about words” (1 Timothy 6:4). Paul had already condemned all these false teachings in his letter to Timothy, so the context would say that is the “knowledge false called science” in 6:20.

Many commentators think that Paul is refuting “gnosticism” in 6:20, especially since gnosticism comes from the word gnosis. From AI: “Elements of Gnostic thought can be traced back to pre-Christian Jewish mysticism and Hellenistic philosophy, particularly Middle Platonism. Gnosticism developed alongside early Christianity, with some scholars suggesting it arose from within Christian communities while others propose it entered Christianity from other sources. Gnostic ideas and writings became prominent in the Mediterranean world during the 2nd century CE. Early Church Fathers denounced Gnosticism as heresy, and efforts to suppress it were largely successful, leading to the loss of much Gnostic literature.” For example, “A key figure (Irenaeus, 130-202 AD) in combating Gnosticism, he is known for his work “Against Heresies,” which systematically dismantled Gnostic teachings. He emphasized the importance of apostolic tradition and the physical resurrection of Christ, both of which were denied by Gnostics.” (AI)

What was “gnosticism”? “Gnosticism was a diverse set of religious and philosophical beliefs that originated before Christianity, with roots in Greek philosophy and various other traditions. It emphasized the concept of “gnosis,” a kind of esoteric knowledge that was believed to be essential for salvation and liberation from the flawed material world. Gnostics believed the material world was created by a lesser, flawed deity (the demiurge) rather than the ultimate, unknowable God.” (AI) “Interest in Gnosticism was revived in the 20th century with the discovery of Gnostic texts in Egypt, such as the Nag Hammadi library.” The Nag Hammadi library contains 52 texts, primarily Gnostic gospels, including the Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Philip, and the Gospel of Truth. These texts, discovered in 1945 near Nag Hammadi, Egypt, offer insights into early Christian and Gnostic thought, often differing from mainstream Christian beliefs.” (AI) The Gospel of Thomas is secret sayings of Jesus given only to Thomas he apostle. The opening lines: “These are the secret sayings that the living Jesus spoke and Didymos Judas Thomas recorded. And [Jesus] said, ‘Whoever discovers the interpretation of these sayings will not taste death.'” “Notice that the emphasis is immediately on discovering an interpretation and on increasing knowledge as a way to eternal life. It contains nothing about salvation coming through one’s relationship with God or even about living a godly life. In this Gnostic gospel, eternal life comes from the secret knowledge that will explain the obscure sayings”. (theberean.org) The Gospel of Thomas is generally believed to have been written in the mid-second century CE, specifically between 100-180 CE. No one really believes that it was written by the apostle Thomas.

Another widely discussed gnostic gospel is the Gospel of Judas which was found in 1978 near El Minya, Egypt, and is part of the Codex Tchacos. “The opening line of the Gospel of Judas demonstrates this secret knowledge: “The secret account of the revelation that Jesus spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot during a week, three days before he celebrated Passover.” This so-called gospel gives a quite different view of the relationship between Jesus Christ and Judas, and its defenders say that it offers “new insights” into Jesus’ betrayal, and the nature and character of Judas. “New insights” is another common theme of Gnosticism.” (theberean.org) The Gospel of Judas makes Judas a hero who is helping Jesus fulfill his destiny to die for the sins of the world instead of “the son of perdition” (Jesus called him that in John 17:12), the betrayer of Jesus who sold out his master for 30 pieces of siilver.

It doesn’t appear that gnosticism proper had been well formed by 62 AD when Paul wrote 1 Timothy, although some roots of it may have come from Jewish mysticism (which 1 Timothy mentions that) and Gentile philosophy. So we probably need to stick with the context of 1 Timothy, as stated above, to define the “knowledge false called science”.

I must admit, however, the temptation to make this a discussion of science today, especially as it relates to certain evolutionary theories that are taught as “knowledge” and facts which really are not scientific facts. So indulge me, please. I certainly think my logic could apply to that error today. Science is based on empirical knowledge that can be tested and proven by the scientific method. True science doesn’t contradict the Bible. But then modern science teaches several things that it calls “scientific facts” such as living matter coming from non-living matter (spontaneous generation). Spontaneous generation was believed to be possible until Pasteur and Redi disproved it in scientific experiments. But atheistic evolutionists still have to maintain that it did happen at some time in the past for their evolution to occur. Modern science teaches that the universe had a beginning, and that it had to come from nothing. But that contradicts their own 1st law of thermodynamics, which says that if there ever was nothing then there would still be nothing (my paraphrase of it). Modern science teaches that man (and every living creature) evolved from a single cell, and that there was “macro” evolution of species evolving to totally different species, such as reptiles evolving from amphibians and mammals evolving from reptiles. There is much adaptation within each species (which is called micro evolution) but there is no proof of species evolving into totally different species. Science claims several fossil proofs of that, but those are inconclusive. There should be millions of transitional fossils as animals went from one species to a totally different species, but that is not found in the fossil evidence. What science teaches is jus unfounded theory but it is taught as proven facts. Modern science teaches that the earth is at least 5 billion years old based on radiometric dating methods. That is pretty much taught as proven fact, but that dating method is based on assumptions that can’t be proved. The original amount of “mother” and “daughter” radioactive element that were in a sample found today must be known to be able to accurately use the radiometric dating method, and that cannot be known. So if science assumes that the original sample had 100% mother and 0% daughter, then that is an assumption that can’t be proven and that could totally disprove the reliability of that method of dating the earth. The Bible genealogical records say that the earth is about 6,000 years old and there are many proofs for a “young earth” such as the decay of the earth’s magnetic field, carbon-14 in diamonds, soft tissue found in dinosaur fossils, polystrate fossils found in multiple sediment layers, and erosion rates of canyons. God created everything full grown, so things would look old immediately after creation (this is called “apparent age”). Adam and Eve would have looked as young adults immediately after God created them. There were precious gems in the Garden of Eden immediately after creation that did not take thousands of years to form. Again, science is teaching things as facts that cannot be proven and can actually be disproven.

In spite of all that, science books continue to teach atheistic evolutionary theories as facts. In a video, “God vs Evolution” (you can watch it on youtube), college students and professors are asked if they believe in macro evolution. All interviewed say yes they do. But when asked why they believe it, they usually just say that they believe it b/c their teachers and science books and science teachers have taught them that such is basically proven facts. When asked to give examples of reptiles evolving from amphibians or other such macro evolution examples, they can’t give a single one.

Thanks for indulging me. I am currently teaching Christian evidences in my Bible classes and we will be studying evolution so what I have written is currently on my mind. It is extremely important that we apply what Paul told Timothy to do, i.e. to refute any “knowledge falsely called science”. If our children buy into atheistic macro evolution, then they will inevitably believe that we are nothing but evolved animals with no absolute morals. They will probably reject the Genesis account of creation in six 24 hour days and start thinking that the Genesis account is just myth. Their false confidence is science might get them to reject all the miracles of the Bible since since says that, for example, no one can walk on water or turn water to wine. Eventually they might lose faith in the Bible as God’s word, and if they do, they might then reject the whole idea of Jesus dying for our sins which is the central message of the Bible.

Thanks for reading.

1 Timothy 3:¹⁴ I am writing these things to you, hoping to come to you before long; ¹⁵ but in case I am delayed, I write so that you will know how one should act in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth. ¹⁶ Beyond question, great is the mystery of godliness:

1. He who was revealed in the flesh,
2. Was vindicated in the Spirit,
3. Seen by angels,
4. Proclaimed among the nations,
5. Believed on in the world,
6. Taken up in glory. 

The church is the pillar and support of the truth. What truth? Some sectarian list of rules and minor doctrines (like instrumental music)? All doctrine is important but the church must stay focused on the main truth of the Christian faith. The following was probably a core “confession of faith”, of what Christians believed in the early church. 

1) Jesus was revealed in the flesh. When? The incarnation. In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God and the word was God, and the Word became flesh. John 1:1-3,14 Sadly, the church in the first few centuries had several different opinions on the nature of Jesus and much church controversy and division. It is sufficient that we believe that Jesus is the only Begotton Son of God.

2) Jesus was vindicated in the Spirit. How? His miracles. Acts 2:²² “Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a Man attested (dikaioó: To justify, to declare righteous, to acquit. Usually translated “justified”) to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know.”

3)Seen by angels. When? Angels were at His: 

Birth: Angels announced Jesus’s birth to the shepherds and sang praises to God.                                        Temptation: Angels ministered to Jesus after his temptation in the wilderness.  Gethsemane: An angel strengthened Jesus during his agony in the Garden of Gethsemane.  Resurrection: Angels rolled the stone from the tomb and announced His resurrection to the women.  Ascension: Angels were present as Jesus ascended into heaven.  Ongoing Ministry: Angels continue to witness and praise Jesus in heaven (Revelation 5).

4) Proclaimed among the nations. When? Preaching of the gospel in Acts. Romans 16:²⁵ Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ.” Colossians 1:23 …”hope of the gospel that you have heard, which was proclaimed in all creation under heaven.”    

5) Believed on in the world. When? The conversion of many in Acts. Saved by grace through faith.  

6) Taken up in glory. When? The ascension. Restored to former glory. John 17:1-3. Raised to be king of kings over all the kingdoms of the world. 

This is a great statement of the core faith, the confession of faith. It is a summary of the plan of redemption. Christians may differ on a lot of minor issues, but this is what we should all believe in adn agree on. This is the message we need to spend our resources on getting it to the nations of the world. Most denominations agree on these central truths. Some, however, do not believe in the miracles or divinity of Jesus, which is sad.

This core set of beliefs is called a “mystery of godliness”. In the New Testament, the word “mystery” (Greek: musterion) generally refers to a truth previously hidden but now revealed, often through divine revelation. It doesn’t necessarily mean something inherently puzzling, but rather a secret known to God and now disclosed to certain individuals, especially through the gospel. (AI) It is used several times in the New Testament.

1 Corinthians 15:51

Behold, I show you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,

1 Corinthians 2:7

But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, [even] the hidden [wisdom], which God ordained before the world unto our glory:

1 Timothy 3:9

Holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience.

2 Thessalonians 2:7

For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth [will let], until he be taken out of the way.

Colossians 1:26

[Even] the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints:

Colossians 1:27

To whom God would make known what [is] the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:

Colossians 2:2

That their hearts might be comforted, being knit together in love, and unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding, to the acknowledgment of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ;

Colossians 4:3

Withal praying also for us, that God would open unto us a door of utterance, to speak the mystery of Christ, for which I am also in bonds:

Ephesians 1:9

Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:

Ephesians 3:3

How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words,

Ephesians 3:4

Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)

Ephesians 3:9

And to make all [men] see what [is] the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:

Ephesians 5:32

This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.

Ephesians 6:19

And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel,

Mark 4:11

And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all [these] things are done in parables:

Revelation 10:7

But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets.

Revelation 1:20

The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.

Revelation 17:5

And upon her forehead [was] a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

Revelation 17:7

And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.

Romans 11:25

For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

Romans 16:25

Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,

 In ancient Rome, mystery cults were secretive religious groups that offered initiates a path to personal salvation and a more fulfilling afterlife through rituals and shared experiences. 
Mystery cults were religious organizations with secret rites and beliefs. They often centered around a mythic narrative involving a god or goddess who experiences death and rebirth, symbolizing the cycle of life and death. Examples would be Mithraism, the Cult of Isis, the Cult of Cibele, the Eleusinian Mysteries, the Cult of Dionysus. The mystery of godliness was not like those pagan mysteries. The mystery of godliness was based on a true historical figure, Jesus, who died and was bodily raised from the dead with plenty of evidence to support that historical occurrence. The mystery of godliness was “how is God going to save and justify sinners and yet remain just to punish sin.” The answer to that mystery was revealed when Jesus died and was raised. That mystery was delivered to the apostles through the inspiration of the Spirit and they preached to the entire Roman Empire.

We are very blessed to be living after the “mystery was finished” (Revelation 10:7) and recorded in the New Testament books. We are not able to see the miracles or resurrection of Jesus, but we have sufficient evidences that they really happened in history.

I am teaching 1 Timothy and we are about to study 1 Timothy 3:¹⁴ I am writing these things to you, hoping to come to you before long; ¹⁵ but in case I am delayed, I write so that you will know how one should act in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth.” Of particular note, he calls the church, which is made up of saved believers in Jesus, the “household of God” and the “pillar and ground of the truth“. So what are the terms used in the NT to describe the church? I found this on AI:

• City. The city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem. Heb 12:22 The New Jerusalem Rev 21:2 This is a spiritual city. Many look for Jesus to come back and establish a new physical city of Jerusalem, but that is not the case.
• Body of Christ:
  This metaphor highlights the unity and interconnectedness of believers, with Christ as the head. Each member plays a vital role, contributing to overall health and function of the body. Col 1
• Temple of God:
  Just as the temple was a dwelling place for God in the Old Testament, the church is seen as a place where God’s Spirit dwells (naos: Temple, sanctuary:denotes the sanctuary proper—the dwelling place of God—rather than the wider temple precincts.. Rev 21:3 the “tabernacle of God” (skénoó: To dwell, to tabernacle, to pitch a tent to live in). God dwells in believers. 1 Cor 3:16; 6:19
• Bride of Christ:
  This metaphor emphasizes the intimate and loving relationship between Christ and the church. Christ is the bridegroom, and the church is his beloved bride. Eph 5
• Flock of God:
  This imagery emphasizes the care and guidance that Christ provides for his followers, likening them to sheep under the care of a shepherd. Acts 20
• Family of God:
  This term (oikos: House, household, home, family) highlights the close-knit relationships among believers, who are considered brothers and sisters in God’s family. 1 Peter 2:6 spiritual house (oikos) made up of “living stones”.
• Kingdom of God:
  This emphasizes the reign and authority of God over the church, and the church’s role in extending God’s kingdom on earth. Col 1:13 This is a spiritual kingdom. Jesus said in John 18:36 “My kingdom is not of this world”. He also said in Matthew 16:27,28 Mark 9:1 that some would still be alive to see Him coming in his new kingdom, which is the church that was established in Acts 2.
• Pillar and Ground of the Truth:
  This metaphor (stulos: evokes the architectural pillar—load-bearing, upright, immovable) emphasizes the church’s role in upholding and proclaiming the truth of the gospel. 1 Tim 3
• Ekklesia:.The Greek word ekklesia, translated as “church” in English, literally means “an assembly” or “those called out,” highlighting the idea of believers being called out from the world to form a community. 

I knew all this but it just reminded me of all the different perspectives the church represents. A complete list of what the church should mean to us as members of that church. Both doctrinally, in our relationships with Jesus and the Father, and in our relationships with one another. We tend to think of the church as a building or a 503c3 organization, but the early church did not own buildings and there was no such thing as a 503c3 with trustees to allow members to write off their donations to the church on their tax returns. The church was simply the believers meeting in house churches, and all the descriptive terms for the church above would have meant a lot to help them understand the role of the church. The Jews were coming out of Judaism with its impersonal rituals and rules. The Gentiles were coming our of worshipping idols with impersonal worship of idols. The idea of “the church” was foreign to them.

So I know that thinking about this helped me to realize what the church should be to me. It helps me to think of being a part of a spiritual family, the dwelling place of God, the flock of sheep with Jesus as the shepherd, etc. It is easy just to “go to church”, sit through a sermon/worship service and let that be “church” to a person. The church should mean so much more to a believer, a member of the church.

I hope this artlce helps us all.

You probably know the story of Corrie Ten Boom and her family in the concentration camps in WWII. They weren’t Jews but hid some Jews in their house (The Hiding Place book and movie). She lost all her family in the camps. Her sister had great faith but feared death and Corrie comforted her by remembering what their father had once told her. “Father sat down on the edge of the narrow bed. “Corrie,” he began gently, “when you and I go to Amsterdam-when do I give you your ticket?” “When Corrie worries about the future, her father asks her when she is given the ticket to get on a train. I sniffed a few times, considering this. “Why, just before we get on the train.” “Exactly. And our wise Father in heaven knows when we’re going to need things, too. Don’t run out ahead of Him, Corrie. When the time comes that some of us will have to die, you will look into your heart and find the strength you need-just in time.“

I know Christians should not fear death. Martyrs like Polycarp were not afraid of death. “Polycarp’s steadfastness is highlighted in his refusal to deny Christ, even when threatened with death by burning and mauling by beasts. He viewed martyrdom not as something to be feared, but as an honor and a way to emulate Christ. He believed that true martyrs represented Christ in their actions surrounding death.” (AI) But I have to be honest. I do fear death. I blame my mom for all my fears! She was always trying to protect me from bad things that might happen. Don’t climb up high, you might fall. So I have acrophobia! Watch out for snakes, so I am afraid of snakes. My grandsons pick up non-poisonous snakes and handle them. My mom always knew of someone who had died from a minor injury or infection, like an infected toe. So even a little infection worries me. She was always cautious about checking the details of everything, so I am OCD. I do have faith that I will live eternally and never die (spiritually) just as Jesus promised, but I still have that fear of death and what it will be like to breathe your last breath and lose life in this body.  

That is why the story of Corrie and her sister Betsy is comforting to me. When it comes time to die, I hope that God will give me the comfort and strength that I need to face death courageously. I believe that he will.

I have a prayer that I make every day asking God to remove fear, doubt, worry, and stress from my mind, to help me to “cast all my anxiety on Him”. I admit that I am a worrier. Here’s what Corrie said about worry. ““Worrying is carrying tomorrow’s load with today’s strength-carrying two days at once. It is moving into tomorrow ahead of time. Worrying doesn’t empty tomorrow of its sorrow, it empties today of its strength. Trying to do the Lord’s work in your own strength is the most confusing, exhausting, and tedious of all work. But when you are filled with the Holy Spirit, then the ministry of Jesus just flows out of you.”

Here is the article some of these quotes from Corrie were taken from. https://emilybrookswriter.com/2022/07/24/waiting-for-your-ticket-the-courage-of-corrie-ten-boom/?scrlybrkr=f2f8117f