PAUL AND 2ND COMING AND THE RESURRECTION

Now let’s look at what Paul said about the 2nd coming. 

Did Paul really say that the resurrection was “about to happen”? 

Acts 24:15 What did Paul say was the “hope of Israel”? ______________

__________________________________________________________________

  • Paul said that he was on trial for the “hope of Israel”, I.e. the resurrection of the dead. Where would he get the idea of the resurrection being the hope of Israel? 
  • That has to come from Daniel 12:1-2 that predicts a resurrection of the righteous and wicked at the end of the age (i.e. in 70 AD). 
  • He also said that there was “about to be (mello)” a resurrection of the dead. Mello always mean about to happen. Is Paul a false prophet when he predicted this?
  • That Greek word “mello” appears 110 times in various forms in the NT. Here are more examples: 
  • MATTHEW’S GOSPEL
  • Matt 2:13 – Now when they had departed, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, “Rise, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you, for Herod is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] search for the child, to destroy him.”
  • Matt 20:22 – Jesus answered, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I am [Gk: μέλλω : mello : I am about to] to drink?” They said to him, “We are able.” 
  • MARK’S GOSPEL
  • Mark 10:32 – And they were on the road, going up to Jerusalem, and Jesus was walking ahead of them. And they were amazed, and those who followed were afraid. And taking the twelve again, he began to tell them what was [Gk: μέλλοντα : mellonta : about to] to happen to him 
  • LUKE’S GOSPEL
  • Luke 7:2 – Now a centurion had a servant1 who was sick and at the point of death [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to], who was highly valued by him.
  • Luke 9:31 – who appeared in glory and spoke of his departure, which he was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] accomplish at Jerusalem.
  • Luke 9:44 – “Let these words sink into your ears: The Son of Man is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] be delivered into the hands of men.”
  • Zacchaeus ran on ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see Jesus, for he was about to (Gk:ἤμελλεν) pass that way …Luke 19:4
  • – CC Image courtesy of Good News Productions International and College Press Publishing … FreeBibleimages.org
  • Luke 10:1 – After this the Lord appointed seventy-two others and sent them on ahead of him, two by two, into every town and place where he himself was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] go.
  • Luke 19:4 – So he ran on ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see him, for he was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] pass that way.
  • Luke 22:23 – And they began to question one another, which of them it could be who was going to [Gk: μέλλων : mellon : was about to] do this. 
  • JOHN’S GOSPEL
  • John 4:47 – When this man heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee, he went to him and asked him to come down and heal his son, for he was at the point of death [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to].
  • We can clearly see from the passages above that certain events were “ABOUT TO” happen… IMMEDIATELY or very SOON after.
  • Matthew 2 – King Herod soon searched for the infant Jesus, just as predicted.
  • Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 9 – The suffering and crucifixion of Jesus did occur within a short time, just as predicted.
  • Luke 19 – Jesus did in fact pass the sycamore tree, soon after Zacchaeus climbed up to see him, just as predicted.
  • “Mello” means that something is IMMINENT and “ABOUT TO HAPPEN”. It never means “MANY YEARS FROM NOW” or “SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE” or “2000 YEARS FROM NOW”! Yet that is what some Bible translators want us to believe, whenever “mello” is used in a passage about the parousia (Second Coming) of Christ.
  • “Mello” means that something is IMMINENT and “ABOUT TO HAPPEN”. It never means “MANY YEARS FROM NOW” or “SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE” or “2000 YEARS FROM NOW”! Yet that is what some Bible translators want us to believe, whenever “mello” is used in a passage about the parousia (Second Coming) of Christ. It is never used to simply mean “certianly will happen” which is the way it is translated in most translations. Why would the translators not translate correctly as “about to happen”? They might translate it “about to happen” in passages that are not eschatological ones, but they would have problems translating the 2nd coming as “about to happen” b/c of almost 2,00 years of church dogma that said that the 2nd coming had not happened yet. A few translations like Young’s Literal Translation translate mello as “about to happen” correctly even in the eschatological passages we have discussed. 
  • So Acts 24:15 is a critical verse. Paul said there was about to be a resurrection. If that resurrection did not happen shortly, then he is a false prophet. Daniel 12:1-2 shows us that resurrection did happen at the end of the age in 70 AD. All those OT people, good and bad, were raised in 70 AD and given their final sentencing, either eternal life or eternal punishment.

Acts 17:31 What did Paul tell the Athenians was about to happen?

_________________________________________________________________

  • Paul told the Athenians that God was about to (mello) judge the world through Jesus. So the judgment that people says will happen in our future had to happen shortly after Paul said this. So it must refer to the judgment in 70 AD.

Acts 24:25 

Paul told Felix the judgement was about to happen (mello)

Is God going to restore the earth to pristine conditions when Jesus returns in our future? 

Romans 8:18, 37 

  • 8:18 “The sufferings of the present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory about to be (mello) revealed in us”. 
  • He then discusses the creation being released from its curse. That creation could be used figuratively to refer to the actual earth that was cursed after the fall or it could refer to the curse put on men (people being the creation) due to sin, but whatever it refers to, the creation being freed from the curse here had to be something that was about to happen (mello in 8:18). 
  • It cannot refer to God destroying the old earth and making a restored earth back to the Garden of Eden perfection at some time in our future today because that was not “about to happen” when Paul wrote 8:18 and did not happen any time after Paul wrote. 
  • This is the same “glory about to be revealed” in 1 Peter 5:1.

Romans 13:12

The night is almost gone and the day is almost here, I.e. the day of Christ’s return (Amplified Bible). 

A critical chapter on the resurrection. Did Paul predict that the resurrection was going to occur while some Corinthians were still alive? 

1 Corinthians 15 Read this chapter. 

  • Paul discusses the 2nd coming at the end of the Jewish Age (70 AD). 
  • Jesus must first conquer all enemies, the last enemy being death. 
  • Paul then discusses the nature of the believer’s resurrection. Some in Corinth were confused or questioning the teaching of the resurrection of believers. 
  • Now remember, Paul had said in Acts 24:15 that there was about to be (mello) the resurrection of the dead (the one predicted in Daniel 12:1-2 to occur at the end of the Jewish age). 
  • Paul then says that believers will get an immortal, incorruptible, spiritual body at their resurrection. “Flesh and blood cannot enter the kingdom” so there will be no resurrection of physical bodies from the graves.

But the critical statement is 15:51. 

  • “We (Paul and those he is writing to in Corinth) shall not all sleep (i.e. be dead) when this resurrection occurs”. 
  • He is not saying that some people will be alive and some dead when Jesus returns. That is obvious. 
  • He is saying that some of the Corinthian Christians will still be alive at Jesus’ 2nd coming and the resurrection, which corresponds with his other statements in Acts 24:15. 
  • But whether dead or alive, all will receive immortality, that immortal, incorruptible, spiritual body at the resurrection in 70 AD when he returns. 
  • In 70 AD he conquered death, which came through the Law (15:54-57) by destroying the temple, the Law, and the ability of the Law to condemn believers in Jesus (Romans 8:1-4).
  • This passage shows that the resurrection had to occur while some of those Corinthians were still alive. It was a spiritual thing. There were no physical bodies coming out of the graves as is often depicted.

Spiritual death has been conquered, as of 70 AD.

  • Jesus said in John 11:24,25 that believers would live even if they died, that they would never die. 
  • It is interesting that evangelicals say that death has not been conquered yet since they think Jesus has not returned yet. They are still waiting for the plan of redemption to be completed. 
  • Not me. As of 70 AD all believers have their immortal resurrected bodies and will go straight to heaven to be with Jesus forever when they die. 
  • No waiting place as in the Old Testament and the story of the rich man and Lazarus. 
  • After 70 AD and death is defeated, believers have eternal life spiritual bodies that keep on living and go to some spiritual heavenly realm after physical death to live forever. Most preachers believe that deceased believers do go immediately to be with Jesus forever. If so, why would they need to leave heaven and the presence of Jesus to come back to earth some day and be judged and have their body in their coffin be raised. If they are in heaven with Jesus after death, they have all the spiritual body they need to be with Jesus forever.
  • Of course, premillenneals believe that the bodies of bellievers will be resurrected at Jesus’ 2nd coming to live in a physical kingdom that he will establish. 3 problems with that. 1) The 2nd coming was at 70 AD, not in our future (see blog article 2nd Coming of Jesus (parts 1 and 2). 2) Jesus established a spiritual kingdom, the church. John 18:36 My kingdom is not of this world.3) This view contradicts Acts 24:15 that the resurrection was about to happen in Paul’s day. Also 1 Cor 15 some would still be alive at the resurrection, so it had to be imminent.

Ephesians 1:21 

The age about to come (mello). 

  • That would be the Messianic Age which began in Acts 2 in 30 AD and was finalized in 70 AD. 

Philippians 3:20 

We (Paul and those he is writing to at Philippi) eagerly await the coming of Jesus

  • Doesn’t that imply an imminent coming in their lifetime?. 

Philippians 4:5 

The Lord is near. Is this his presence is near or his 2nd coming is near (eggus: Near, close, at hand)?

Colossians 2:17 

A shadow of the things about to come (mello). 

  • The new covenant blessings would only be fully realized in 70 AD. Hebrews 8:13 says that the old covenant was ready (eggus) to disappear. That was written about 62 AD and must refer to 70 AD. Some say the old covenant ended at the cross in 30 AD, but Heb 8:13 rejects that view. The old covenant was perpetual till the end of the age in 70 AD. Even the Jewish Christians kept the Law till 70 AD, even while they kept the new covenant. They knew the old covenant could not save them, but it was the law of God for them until God removed it in 70 AD by sending the Romans to destroy the temple and kill one million Jews (according to Josephus).

1 Thessalonians 1:10 

To wait for the coming of Jesus from heaven to rescue us from the coming wrath. 

  • What wrath? 2:16 will explain that wrath, i.e. on the Jews in 70 AD. 1 Thess 2:For you suffered the same things from your own countrymen as they did from the Jews,[h] 15 who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out, and displease God and oppose all mankind 16 by hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles that they might be saved—so as always to fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them at last!. That wrath to come must be God’s wrath poured out on the Jews in 70 AD.
  • John the Baptist predicted the same thing. Mt 3:But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come (mello about to come)? Bear fruit in keeping with repentance. And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. 10 Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.11 “I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 12 His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.” This was obviously wrath to come on the Jews in 70 AD b/c it was a wrath (mello) about to come, imminent.
  • Malachi had predicted this same wrath on the Jews. Mal 4:“Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and awesome day of the Lord comes. And he will turn the hearts of fathers to their children and the hearts of children to their fathers, lest I come and strike the land with a decree of utter destruction.” That awesome day of the Lord was a judgment day on the Jews in 70 AD.
  • That was the same day as Acts 2:19 And I will show wonders in the heavens above
        and signs on the earth below,
        blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke;
    20 the sun shall be turned to darkness
        and the moon to blood,
        before the day of the Lord comes, the great and magnificent day. This was a fulfillment of Joel 2.
  • That led Peter to tell the Jews in Acts 2:40 And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” There’s that idea of judgment on that generation of Jews living at that time, the same one that Jesus kept saying was evil and going to be judged in 70 AD.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 

  • God’s wrath has come upon them (the non Christian Jews who were persecuting the Christian Jews, as Paul did) at last! 
  • This has to be 70 AD judgment on the Jews in which one million died, 200,000 captives (according to Josephus). 
  • John the Baptist said that this wrath on the Jews was about to come (mello, Mt 3:7)

1 Thessalonians 2:19 

The Thessalonians Christians would be Paul’s joy and crown at Jesus’ coming

1 Thessalonians 3:13 

Paul wanted them to be blameless at the coming of Jesus

1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 

  • This is one of the most misunderstood eschatological passages. The rapture theory comes from this passage, although the Greek word is believers being “caught up”. The word rapture comes from the Latin Vulgate translation of “caught up”. 
  • The only other passage used to teach the rapture theory is Mt 24: 40,41 where one is taken (raptured) and one left. 
  • The false assumption is that this taking up occurs at a coming of Jesus that will happen in our future, but the context of Mt 24 is AD 70 2nd coming all the way through the chapter. 24:34 everything up to that verse must happen within that generation (genea). But many say that it changes to a future 2nd coming in 24:35 and that the flood analogy refers to the rapture of the righteous at Jesus’ 2nd coming in our future.
  • But notice, in the days of Noah and the flood, who was taken? The righteous or the wicked? Who was left after the flood?
  • It was the wicked who were taken (Amplied Bible adds “for judgment), and the righteous were left on earth (Noah and his family). 
  • That is just the opposite of what the rapture theory teaches (and the wrong coming of Jesus as they teach). They say in the rapture the righteous will be taken, but in the flood the wicked were taken. Just the opposite. The whole chapter Mt 24 is about the 2nd coming in 70 AD.

Does 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 teach there will be a future rapture and resurrection?

In 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 What does it sound like was a concern of the Thessalonians concerning the imminent 2nd coming?

_________________________________________________________________

 Paul is addressing a concern of the Thessalonians Christians that Timothy had relayed to him after visiting them. 

  • They thought Jesus’ 2nd coming was in their lifetime (because Paul taught them that), but what if one of their fellow believers died before then? Would they be left out of the glory of the 2nd coming that they had been told was imminent within their lifetime? 
  • Paul told them not to worry. Jesus would come in the clouds bringing with him those Christians who died during the transition period from AD 30-70 (some of them martyrs). Thus “the dead in Christ would rise first”. 
  • This is the 1st resurrection of Rev 20:1-4 (more later). Apparently those believers who died during the transition period did not go to hades as al the Old Testament people did. Instead, they went to be with the Lord. This answer would have relieved the Thessalonians of their concern.
  • He adds that the living believers would then be “caught up” to meet the Lord and be with him always. 
  • Typically, many say this means a rapture to meet Jesus at his 2nd coming, after which the believers will then go to heaven to be with Jesus (often they add for 7 years or tribulation on earth followed by another coming of Jesus to establish an earthly kingdom and do a final judgment). 
  • But not so. In the Roman world, a dignitary or king would visit a town. The people would go out to meet him and then return with him back into their town to enjoy his presence with them.
  • That is what 1 Thess 4:13-18 is picturing in some figurative language.
  • .Jesus would come in the clouds. Living believers would figuratively meet him in the air (where the clouds are) and then the believers and Jesus would come back to earth so that his presence would be with the believers on earth forever. 
  • He does not take them back to heaven. The word for his 2nd coming is parousia, and means coming or presence, i.e. when you come to someone, you make your presence with them. 
  • As of 70 AD. Jesus has made his presence among believers in the tabernacle of God, the sanctuary, the church. 
  • He dwells in believers’ hearts through faith (Eph 3:17) spiritually, figuratively, not physically. 
  • Paul also says “we who are alive”, implying that some of those (maybe including himself) will still be alive when the the events of 4:13-18 occur. 

This idea is John 14:3,23. What did Jesus say he was going to do?

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

  • Jesus promises the apostles that he will come to them and make his dwelling place with them (14:3). This is not the parousia word for “come” to them, and is fulfilled in coming to them by giving them the Holy Spirit (14:18,25,26) which occurred in Acts 2 with their baptism in the Holy Spirit. 
  • Many use 14:1-3 to say that Jesus will come and take believers off the earth to a mansion in heaven prepared for them, but not so. 
  • 14:23 is the same Greek word for “dwelling place” as in 14:3 and it it means that he will come to them and make his dwelling in them through the Holy Spirit on earth from AD 30-70. 
  • He prepares a mansion for them but brings it down with him to earth where he can dwell in them in a dwelling place mansion on earth, not in heaven. So the song “I’ve got a mansion just over the hilltop….” that makes the mansion of John 14 to be heaven might not be correct! Jesus’ dwelling place or mansion is with us Christians on earth.

1 Thessalonians 5:1-11 

  • This follows up on the 2nd coming, saying that it will be like a thief in the night. 
  • Some have trouble reconciling this idea with the fact that Jesus gave signs of his 2nd coming to look for. 
  • But even if you read the signs correctly, you would get prepared by being a faithful servant (Mt 24:42-51) but you still would not know the exact hour, so you better be prepared at all times. 
  • BTW 5:1-11 he tells them to stay ready at all times for the 2nd coming. It does appear that he is saying that some of them will be alive at that coming, or else this warning would not mean much to them.

2 Thessalonians 1:5-12 In what way did Paul tell them that the 2nd coming would bring relief to them? Relief from what?

________________________________________________________________

  • Paul says that when Jesus is revealed at his 2nd coming in his glory to glorify his saints that he will deal out vengeance on those who are causing the Jewish Christians to suffer, I.e. the Jewish non Christians (1 Thess 2:14-16, like Saul who killed Jewish Christians). 
  • The persecution that caused the Jewish Christians to scatter from Jerusalem in Acts 8 would be from Jewish non Christians in Jerusalem. 
  • This promise of relief from suffering at his 2nd coming would not mean much if his 2nd coming did not occur in their lifetime, would it?

Who is the “man of sin” in 2 Thessalonians 2? Is he still to come?

2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 What had they heard about the 2nd coming?

_________________________________________________________________

  • After Timothy delivered the 1 Thessalonians letter to them, he came back with this issue about the 2nd coming. 
  • Some were saying the 2nd coming had already happened. 
  • BTW if Paul had taught them that there would be a physical resurrection of bodies from the graves at the 2nd coming, then he could have just said, “But did anyone observe that happening”.
  • So this shows that he was not teaching a physical resurrection of bodies out of the graves at Jesus’ 2nd coming! 

The “man of sin” was Titus who destroyed the temple. 

  • Paul then goes on to say several things were yet to happen before the 2nd coming: an apostasy, the Man of Sin (some call this the Antichrist) must appear claiming to be God and taking his seat in the temple of God.
  • BTW only the emperor Titus fits this description of the man of sin. He claimed to be God and he entered the temple in 70 AD when he destroyed it and received sacrifices to himself as God. Many have thought the man of sin to be Nero, but Nero never took his seat in the temple.
  • But Paul says that at the time of writing the 2nd letter, someone was restraining Titus and that person had to be removed first before Titus would do his thing. 
  • Paul said in 2:7 that all this was “already at work” at the time he wrote this letter. 
  • In other words, all this would occur in their lifetime. 
  • Not some Antichrist that comes in our future (numerous guesses have been made as to who the Antichrist was or will be, all of them wrong guesses. 
  • The coming of the Man of Sin would be accompanied by false wonders and deceptive signs. 
  • Indeed, the earth beast of Rev 13 is the false Jewish prophets who persuaded Jewish non Christians to worship the Roman sea beast (more later). 
  • BTW Christ would slay the man of sin at his coming, but did Christ slay Titus physically? 
  • No. But he did destroy all earthly powers when he came in 70 AD, and become king of kings over all the kingdoms of the world (Rev 11:15). He also destroyed all the demonic princes, one of which would have been behind the evil Roman Empire. Daniel 9 talks about evil princes of different kingdoms.

2 Timothy 4:1 What did Paul say that Jesus was about to do? 

______________________________________________________________

  • Jesus is about to (mello) judge the living and the dead by his appearing and his kingdom. Is this not clear that the judgment and his 2nd coming was about to happen?

Conclusion

It is obvious that the Christians living in the transition period from AD 30-70 expected an imminent, within their generation, in their lifetime, 2nd coming of Jesus. 

  • As James Stewart Russell said, “Why would they think that? Because Jesus and the apostles told them that”. 
  • Some say that the apostles are simply saying that the 2nd coming could be at any time, but that is not what they said.
  • Some say that the apostles thought the 2nd coming was imminent but that they were just mistaken. 
  • Wrong. The apostles wrote by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit and their statements were error free. 
  • If not, how would you know if any of their other teachings were mistaken.
  • Some say that even Jesus could be wrong about the timing of the 2nd coming being imminent. 
  • They base that on his comment that even the Son of Man did not know the exact hour of his coming. 
  • C.S.Lewis took this position when he said that Mt 10:23 was the most embarrassing verse in the Bible because in it Jesus predicted his 2nd coming within the lifetime of the apostles and yet that did not come true. 
  • C.S.Lewis just shirks that off saying, “Even Jesus could be mistaken at times”. 
  • Wrong again
  • . Jesus might not have known the exact hour of his 2nd coming, but he clearly states that the 2nd coming will be in that generation, or else he is a false prophet. 

Titus 2:11-13

  • Awaiting and confidently expecting the blessed hope and the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus. 

THE BOOK OF HEBREWS: CANONICITY AND THE 2ND COMING AND END OF THE OLD COVENANT

Why was the canonicity of the book of Hebrews questioned by some?

The canonicity of the book of Hebrews was in doubt in the early church because of the uncertainty of its authorship. Some thought Paul wrote it which would automatically make it canonical. Others did not think Paul wrote it, attributing it to Barnabas or Clement or someone else, and that uncertainly made its canonicity questionable. From the internet: the western church did not accept Paul as the author of Hebrews until the fourth century. In fact, most modern scholars now believe the author is unknown. 

Here are some reasons why the church has rejected Paul as the author of Hebrews:

Separation from eyewitnesses: In Hebrews 2:3, the author separates himself from the original eyewitnesses, which is different from Paul’s emphasis on his authority as an apostle.  

Style: The style of Hebrews is different from Paul’s letters.  

Name: Paul identifies himself by name in his 13 letters, but Hebrews does not name the author.  

But, whoever wrote it, it was inspired by the Holy Spirit! 

  • But there is no doubt that it is from an inspired author! It was written in the early 60’ and its predictions of the things about to happen (mello), of the 2nd coming in a very little while that would not be delayed, of the replacement of the old covenant with the new, etc. are all inspired exegesis of what the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem in 70 AD meant in God’s plan to give the new covenant. 

Why I don’t think that Paul wrote Hebrews. 

1) Hebrews 1:3. How does the author say that the words of Jesus were confirmed to him? _______________________________________________  

  • I am not sure of the author but I don’t think it was Paul b/c Paul would never have said in Heb 1:3 that the word spoken by Jesus was confirmed to us (including himself) by those that heard him (the apostles). 
  • Paul argued in Galatians 1 that he received his gospel directly from Jesus and not from the apostles, so he would never have said that. 

Why I think the book is canonical and inspired: key eschatological passages in Hebrews. 

2) Heb 8:13 What does the author say about the old covenant? ___________

_________________________________________________________________

  • The old covenant “is ready (eggus: Near, close, at hand) to disappear (aphanismos: Disappearance, destruction, ruin) ”. This doesn’t mention the 2nd coming, but it is an important eschatological passage. 
  • “Near” is eggizó: To draw near, to approach, to come near. The word is used 43 times in the NT.
  • Matthew 3:2: “the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
  • Matthew 4:17: “the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
  • Matthew 10:7: “The kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
  • Matthew 15:8: “This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoreth”
  • Matthew 21:1: “And when they drew nigh unto Jerusalem, and were come to”
  • Matthew 21:34: “time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to”
  • Matthew 26:45: “behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man”
  • Matthew 26:46: “Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray me.”
  • Mark 1:15: “the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the”
  • Mark 11:1: “And when they came nigh to Jerusalem, unto Bethphage and”
  • Mark 14:42: “lo, he that betrayeth me is at hand.”
  • Luke 7:12: “Now when he came nigh to the gate of the city,”
  • Luke 10:9: “unto them, The kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.”
  • Luke 10:11: “the kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.”
  • Luke 12:33: “heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth”
  • Luke 15:1: “Then drew near unto him all the publicans and”
  • Luke 15:25: “and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard music”
  • Luke 18:35: “And it came to pass, that as he was come nigh unto Jericho, a certain blind man”
  • Luke 18:40: “him: and when he was come near, he asked him,”
  • Luke 19:29: “And it came to pass, when he was come nigh to Bethphage and Bethany,”
  • Luke 19:37: “And when he was come nigh, even now at the descent of the”
  • Luke 19:41: “And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over”
  • Luke 21:8: “Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after”
  • Luke 21:20: “the desolation thereof is nigh.”
  • Luke 21:28: “for your redemption draweth nigh.”
  • Luke 22:1: “the feast of unleavened bread drew nigh, which is called the Passover.”
  • Luke 22:47: “went before them, and drew near unto Jesus to kiss him.”
  • Luke 24:15: “Jesus himself drew near, and went with them.”
  • Luke 24:28: “And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and”
  • Acts 7:17: “time of the promise drew nigh, which God had sworn to Abraham,”
  • Acts 9:3: “And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about”
  • Acts 10:9: “as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up”
  • Acts 21:33: “Then the chief captain came near, and took him, and commanded”
  • Acts 22:6: “that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly”
  • Acts 23:15: “and we, or ever he come near, are ready to kill”
  • Romans 13:12: “the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works”
  • Philippians 2:30: “the work of Christ he was nigh unto death, not regarding his life,”
  • Hebrews 7:19: “of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.”
  • Hebrews 10:25: “as ye see the day approaching.”
  • James 4:8: ” Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners;”
  • James 4:8: “Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners;”
  • James 5:8: “for the coming of the Lord draweth nigh.”
  • Some say the old covenant disappeared, ended, at the cross. 
  • Certainly, the cross and death of Jesus was the basis for a new covenant since the first covenant could not save anyone, but 8:13 clearly shows that the 1st covenant did not disappear or end until 70 AD when the temple and Jerusalem were destroyed. The old covenant could only condemn, not save, and its power to condemn ceased at the cross for those who would be saved by grace through faith in Jesus and the new covenant.

Jewish Christians continued to keep the Law until 70 AD but they understood that it was the new covenant that saved them, not the old.  

  • Acts 21:17-26 What did James the Lord’s brother tell Paul that thousands of Jewish Christians were doing? 
  • James asked Paul to join 4 men in keeping a Jewish vow to show that he was not telling Jewish converts to quit keeping the Law (he did tell Gentile converts that they did not need to keep the Law, but that was not in James’ discussion). 
  • So what did Paul do? Did he tell James that the Jewish converts were not required to keep the Law since the Law died at the cross? 
  • Nope. He kept the Jewish vow with the 4 men to show that he was not teaching Jewish concerts to quit keeping the Law. 
  • Some have said that Paul was just “becoming all things to all men” in keeping this vow, but Paul would never have done that on such a critical issue. 

3) Heb 9:8 What does the author say about the way into the new Holy of Holies of the new covenant? 

________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

  • 9:8 “The way into the new Holy of Holies (in heaven) has not yet been disclosed as long as the first or outer tabernacle “is” still standing”. 
  • This shows that, while the 2nd covenant began in Acts 2, the 2nd covenant would not be fully disclosed and confirmed until the temple was destroyed in 70 AD. The present tense of the verb “is” shows that. This verse also shows that the temple was still standing and the priests still ministering at the time of writing of Hebrews, so it was definitely written before 70 AD.
  • The NIV has the verb “was” but that is not the correct Gk verb tense. 

4) Heb 9:28 What does the author say is the purpose of Jesus’ 2nd coming?

__________________________________________________________________

  • 9:28 “Christ was offered once for all time in his 1st coming, but he would appear a 2nd time, not to deal with sin, but to bring salvation to those who are eagerly and confidently waiting for him.” 
  • His 2nd coming would bring physical salvation for the Jewish Christian remnant who escaped the siege of Jerusalem in 70 AD as well as put an end to non Christian Jews persecuting Jewish Christians (1 Thess 2:14-16; 2 Thess 1). 
  • His 2nd coming at the end of the age would also bring spiritual salvation, destroying death (1 Cor 15) and bring immortality to believers in 70 AD. 

5) Heb 10:27 What did the author say about a coming judgment of Jewish Christians  if they lose their faith in Jesus and start trusting in the Law?

________________________________________________________________

  • There is about to be (mello) a judgment on the Jews and that would include any Jewish Christians who forsake faith in Christ and return to the Law for salvation (which was the purpose of writing Hebrews, to convince them not to do that). 
  • That imminent judgement was 70 AD.

A passage that refutes the “delayed 2nd coming” theory of many.

6) Heb 10:37 What does the author say about Jesus’ coming? __________

_________________________________________________________________

  • That imminent, “about to be” (mello) judgment in 10:27 is tied to the 2nd coming in 10:37. “Yet in a very little while, He who is coming will come and will not delay.” The work mello is always used in the NT of something that is “about to happen”.
  • USE OF “MELLO” TO WARN OF IMMINENT ACTIONS OR EVENTS.
  • That Greek word “mello” appears 110 times in various forms in the NT. Here are more examples: 
  • MATTHEW’S GOSPEL
  • Matt 2:13 – Now when they had departed, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, “Rise, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you, for Herod is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] search for the child, to destroy him.”
  • Matt 20:22 – Jesus answered, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I am [Gk: μέλλω : mello : I am about to] to drink?” They said to him, “We are able.” 
  • MARK’S GOSPEL
  • Mark 10:32 – And they were on the road, going up to Jerusalem, and Jesus was walking ahead of them. And they were amazed, and those who followed were afraid. And taking the twelve again, he began to tell them what was [Gk: μέλλοντα : mellonta : about to] to happen to him 
  • LUKE’S GOSPEL
  • Luke 7:2 – Now a centurion had a servant1 who was sick and at the point of death [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to], who was highly valued by him.
  • Luke 9:31 – who appeared in glory and spoke of his departure, which he was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] accomplish at Jerusalem.
  • Luke 9:44 – “Let these words sink into your ears: The Son of Man is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] be delivered into the hands of men.”
  • Zacchaeus ran on ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see Jesus, for he was about to (Gk:ἤμελλεν) pass that way …Luke 19:4
  • – CC Image courtesy of Good News Productions International and College Press Publishing … FreeBibleimages.org
  • Luke 10:1 – After this the Lord appointed seventy-two others and sent them on ahead of him, two by two, into every town and place where he himself was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] go.
  • Luke 19:4 – So he ran on ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see him, for he was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] pass that way.
  • Luke 22:23 – And they began to question one another, which of them it could be who was going to [Gk: μέλλων : mellon : was about to] do this. 
  • JOHN’S GOSPEL
  • John 4:47 – When this man heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee, he went to him and asked him to come down and heal his son, for he was at the point of death [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to].
  • We can clearly see from the passages above that certain events were “ABOUT TO” happen… IMMEDIATELY or very SOON after.
  • Matthew 2 – King Herod soon searched for the infant Jesus, just as predicted.
  • Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 9 – The suffering and crucifixion of Jesus did occur within a short time, just as predicted.
  • Luke 19 – Jesus did in fact pass the sycamore tree, soon after Zacchaeus climbed up to see him, just as predicted.
  • “Mello” means that something is IMMINENT and “ABOUT TO HAPPEN”. It never means “MANY YEARS FROM NOW” or “SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE” or “2000 YEARS FROM NOW”! Yet that is what some Bible translators want us to believe, whenever “mello” is used in a passage about the parousia (Second Coming) of Christ.
  • “Mello” means that something is IMMINENT and “ABOUT TO HAPPEN”. It never means “MANY YEARS FROM NOW” or “SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE” or “2000 YEARS FROM NOW”! Yet that is what some Bible translators want us to believe, whenever “mello” is used in a passage about the parousia (Second Coming) of Christ. It is never used to simply mean “certianly will happen” which is the way it is translated in most translations. Why would the translators not translate correctly as “about to happen”? They might translate it “about to happen” in passages that are not eschatological ones, but they would have problems translating the 2nd coming as “about to happen” b/c of almost 2,00 years of church dogma that said that the 2nd coming had not happened yet. A few translations like Young’s Literal Translation translate mello as “about to happen” correctly even in the eschatological passages we have discussed.
  • As stated earlier, this is a critical passage to destroy the idea that Jesus delayed his predicted imminent 2nd coming. 
  • Again, people say that b/c they expected him to establish a physical kingdom and he did not do that in 70 AD. 
  • They say he delayed his 2nd coming and will one day (going on 2000 years and counting) come back and set up his earthly kingdom.
  • He never intended to set up an earthly kingdom (John 18:36 my kingdom is not of this world). 
  • He had preached that the “kingdom (of Daniel 2:44) is at hand (eggizó: To draw near, to approach, to come near)”.
  • He had said that some would still be alive to see him coming in his kingdom (Mt 16:27). He said that he was mello about to come.
  • He would be a false prophet if the kingdom was not established soon after these predictions. 
  • It was established soon after in the church, a spiritual kingdom. 
  • Jesus equated the kingdom and the church in Mt 16:16-19. 18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell[c] shall not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”He said Peter would have the keys to open the door for entrance into the church kingdom. 
  • Peter used those keys in Acts 2 as he preached the first gospel sermon with 3,000 being saved and entering that new church kingdom.
  • Paul said that Christians had been translated into the kingdom of His beloved Son (Col 1:13, so the kingdom of Jesus was already established as Paul was writing). But in Luke 21:31 So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that the kingdom of God is near. 32 Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all has taken place. He was predicting the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD which had to occur within that generation (genea, always used of a 40 year period or the people living in a 40 year period, just was we speak of the baby boomers generation, the Z generation, etc.). He even said in Luke 21:36 But stay awake at all times, praying that you may have strength to escape all these things that are (mellow, about to) take place, and to stand before the Son of Man.” So all the predictions in Luke 21 were “about to happen” (mello). So back to 21:31. In what sense was the “kingdom of God is near (eggus: Near, close, at hand)”. If the kingdom of God was the church, and Col 1:13 says that Christians had already been translated into the kingdom of Jesus at the time of writing (62 AD), then how could Luke’s prediction of Lk 21:31 that the kingdom of God is near when the events in 70 AD occur.
  • I use our election of presidents to explain that. We elected a new president on Nov 5, 2024. The inauguration is Jan 20, 2025. So officially we have a “president elect” and a new government that only officially begins to rule on Jan 20, 2025. In the meantime, the new president elect is appointing his new cabinet and beginning to remove the old cabinet. But all that only becomes official in 2025. It is the same with the kingdom of God that was near. Acts 2 the day of Pentecost in 30 AD was the Nov 5 of our elections. It was the establishment of the church (Acts 2:37). The official rule of the new church kingdom would be in 70 AD after Jesus had defeated all his enemies (the last enemy was spiritual death 1 Cor 15) and removed the old covenant (Heb 8:13 that old covenant was removed in 70 AD). So we might say that Trump is the new president during the interim of Novv 5,2024 to Jan 20, 2025 but he only officially becomes the president on Jan 20, 2025. Paul could say that those living in the transition period from AD 30 to AD 70 were indeed in the kingdom but teachnically the kingdom would not be fully operative till 70 AD.
  • Many use the phrase “already, not yet” to describe this transition period. The Christians were “alrready in the kingdom Col 1:13” but “not yet” in the final phase of the kingdom in 70 AD.
  • Acts 14:22 strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith, and saying that through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God. Paul said this to those he had just converted. According to Paul in Col 1:13, they were already in the church kingdom. And yet he says they will enter a future kingdom, which would refer to 70 AD.
  • 2 Peter 1:11 For in this way there will be richly provided for you an entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Again, the Christians Peter was writing to were already in the church kingdom, but there was another phase of the kingdom for them to enter in their future, which would be 70 AD.
  • Of course, premillineals say that this future kingdom is a physical kingdom set up by Jesus when he returns in our future. 3 problems with that. 1) Jesus’ 2nd coming was in 70 AD (see blog articles 2nd Coming of Jesus (part 1 and 2). 2) Jesus’ kingdom he set us was a spiritual kingdom. John 18:36 my kingdom is not of this world. 3) Jesus said that some would still be alive to see him coming in his kingdom Mt 16:27,28 (and that coming was mello about to happen).
  • I was raised in a church that said that this everlasting phase of the kingdom in 2 Peter 1:11 was heaven, but that would contradict Lk 21:31 who said that the future phase of the kingdom would be near in 70 AD. Of course my church said that the 2nd coming is in our future which is not true either.
  • Jesus did not delay his 2nd coming. He came in 70 AD just as he predicted. The only reason anyone would say that Jesus did indeed predict an imminent 2nd coming but that he delayed it is that they expect Jesus to set up a physical kingdom when he comes back. They are making the same mistake that the unbelieving Jews made. Those Jews expected a physical kingdom of political power like that of the kingdom of David and a king who would defeat the Romans (like David defeated the enemies of Israel).

7) Heb 12:25-29 What did the author say that God was going to shake?

__________________________________________________________________

  • After saying that the believers had come to the heavenly Jerusalem (i.e. the new Jerusalem the church) and to the new covenant, the writer said that God was going to once more shake not only the earth but also the heavens, removing the things that can be shaken (the old Jewish heavens and earth, the old Jewish system, a physical system that could be destroyed and was destroyed in 70 AD). 
  • A new spiritual system the new heavens and earth, the new Messianic system, would remain that cannot be shaken b/c it cannot be destroyed (Mt 16:18). 
  • BTW, doesn’t this sound a lot like 2 Peter 3 and the replacing of the old heavens and earth with a new heavens and earth? 

Some more “mello” (about to happen) passages in Hebrews:

Heb 2:5; 6:6 

2:5 The world about to come (mello). 6:6 the age about to come (mello).

  • These passages are predicting the Messianic Age that began in Acts 2 in 30 AD and would be finalized and confirmed in 70 AD. Technically the new Messianic Age began in 70 AD after the old age (called the “present age in the NT) ended.

Heb 13:14 

Seeking the city which is about to come (mello). 

  • What city was about to come when Hebrews was written? 
  • This could only be the new Jerusalem, the church, which began in Acts 2 in 30 AD, but was only finalized in 70 AD. 
  • Rev 21:1 pictures that new Jerusalem coming down to earth and says that city is the bride or Christ, i.e. the church. 

So do you see why I say that the author of Hebrews was inspired by the Holy Spirit. The book predicts accurately so many things about the 2nd coming in 70 AD. The book gives an inspired discussion of the difference of the two covenants. Whoever wrote it was inspired. 

The next lesson will look at what the apostle Paul said about the 2nd coming and the resurrection. 

THE 2ND COMING OF JESUS (PART 2)

Now let’s look at what the apostles said about the timing of the 2nd coming. 

James:

James 5:8,9 The coming of the Lord is near; the Judge is standing right at the door. 

Peter:

1 Peter 4:7 The end and culmination of all things is near. The end of what? The end of the old law and Jewish theocracy. He could not mean the end of the physical world or else he would be a false prophet since that was not near. “near” is Now let’s look at what the apostles said about the timing of the 2nd coming. 

  1. James:

James 5:8,9 The coming of the Lord is near; the Judge is standing right at the door. 

“Near” is eggizó: To draw near, to approach, to come near. The word is used 43 times in the NT.

Matthew 3:2: “the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
Matthew 4:17: “the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
Matthew 10:7: “The kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
Matthew 15:8: “This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoreth”
Matthew 21:1: “And when they drew nigh unto Jerusalem, and were come to”
Matthew 21:34: “time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to”
Matthew 26:45: “behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man”
Matthew 26:46: “Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray me.”
Mark 1:15: “the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the”
Mark 11:1: “And when they came nigh to Jerusalem, unto Bethphage and”
Mark 14:42: “lo, he that betrayeth me is at hand.”
Luke 7:12: “Now when he came nigh to the gate of the city,”
Luke 10:9: “unto them, The kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.”
Luke 10:11: “the kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.”
Luke 12:33: “heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth”
Luke 15:1: “Then drew near unto him all the publicans and”
Luke 15:25: “and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard music”
Luke 18:35: “And it came to pass, that as he was come nigh unto Jericho, a certain blind man”
Luke 18:40: “him: and when he was come near, he asked him,”
Luke 19:29: “And it came to pass, when he was come nigh to Bethphage and Bethany,”
Luke 19:37: “And when he was come nigh, even now at the descent of the”
Luke 19:41: “And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over”
Luke 21:8: “Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after”
Luke 21:20: “the desolation thereof is nigh.”
Luke 21:28: “for your redemption draweth nigh.”
Luke 22:1: “the feast of unleavened bread drew nigh, which is called the Passover.”
Luke 22:47: “went before them, and drew near unto Jesus to kiss him.”
Luke 24:15: “Jesus himself drew near, and went with them.”
Luke 24:28: “And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and”
Acts 7:17: “time of the promise drew nigh, which God had sworn to Abraham,”
Acts 9:3: “And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about”
Acts 10:9: “as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up”
Acts 21:33: “Then the chief captain came near, and took him, and commanded”
Acts 22:6: “that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly”
Acts 23:15: “and we, or ever he come near, are ready to kill”
Romans 13:12: “the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works”
Philippians 2:30: “the work of Christ he was nigh unto death, not regarding his life,”
Hebrews 7:19: “of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.”
Hebrews 10:25: “as ye see the day approaching.”
James 4:8: ” Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners;”
James 4:8: “Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners;”
James 5:8: “for the coming of the Lord draweth nigh.”

2. Peter:

1 Peter 4:7 The end and culmination of all things is near. The end of what? The end of the old law and Jewish theocracy. If he was predicting that the end of the physical world things, then he was a false prophet since that did not happen. “Near” is eggizó as in James 5:8.

1 Peter 5:1 the glory that is about to be (mello) revealed (at 2nd coming). Refer to the blog article The 2nd Coming of Jesus (Part 1) to see the use of mello in the NT. It always refers to something about to happen. For example just a few:

Matt 2:13 – Now when they had departed, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, “Rise, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you, for Herod is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] search for the child, to destroy him.”

Matt 20:22 – Jesus answered, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I am [Gk: μέλλω : mello : I am about to] to drink?” They said to him, “We are able.”

Mark 10:32 – And they were on the road, going up to Jerusalem, and Jesus was walking ahead of them. And they were amazed, and those who followed were afraid. And taking the twelve again, he began to tell them what was [Gk: μέλλοντα : mellonta : about to] to happen to him

Luke 7:2 – Now a centurion had a servant1 who was sick and at the point of death [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to], who was highly valued by him.

Luke 9:31 – who appeared in glory and spoke of his departure, which he was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] accomplish at Jerusalem.

Luke 9:44 – “Let these words sink into your ears: The Son of Man is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] be delivered into the hands of men.”

Luke 10:1 – After this the Lord appointed seventy-two others and sent them on ahead of him, two by two, into every town and place where he himself was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] go.

Luke 19:4 – So he ran on ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see him, for he was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] pass that way.

Luke 22:23 – And they began to question one another, which of them it could be who was going to [Gk: μέλλων : mellon : was about to] do this.

John 4:47 – When this man heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee, he went to him and asked him to come down and heal his son, for he was at the point of death [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to].

It is the same word mell used by Jesus to say that 2nd coming was “about to happen”

Matthew 16:27 – the Son of Man is going to i [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay each person according to what he has done.

Romans 8 expounds on this glory about to be revealed. 

Romans 8:18,38 YLT ii – 18 For I reckon that the sufferings of the present time [are] not worthy [to be compared] with the glory about to [Gk: μέλλουσαν : mellousan : about to] be revealed in us; … 38 for I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor messengers, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things about to be [Gk: μέλλοντα : mellonta : about to (be)].

Many interpret Romans 8:18-25 as a new creation of the earth, a restoration of the earth to the Garden of Eden paradise, but 8:18 says that the glory of this predicted event (whatever the “new creation” might mean) is mello about to happen, so it can’t refer to an event at least 2,00 years later in our future. What does it mean? Since the creation is eagerly waiting for its adoption as sons, then it must refer to sinners awaiting the 2nd coming (which Jesus said was about to happen Mk 16:27,28) and the glory that would be given to the true sons of God, i.e. Christians as opposed to the destruction of the wicked Jews.

2 Peter 3  If Peter said the end of all things is near in 1 Peter 4:7, then when he talks about the destruction of the old heavens and earth in 2 Peter 3, would that destruction not also be included in the “end of all things is near” time frame?

2 Peter 3:10,12 The elements would be burned up. We think that means the elements of the periodic table of which the earth is made up of, but it doesn’t mean that. The Greek word for elements is stoicheion, which means the rudimentary principle or rules of something. The word is used only In Gal 4:3, 9; Col 2:8,20; Heb 5:12 where it means the elementary principles of the world or of religious systems or of the Law. It never refers to the elements of the periodic table. The use of the word in Heb 3:10,12 refers to the elementary principles of the old Jewish system (as in Heb 5:12), the old heavens and earth which were about to be destroyed in 70 AD. The old heavens and earth (the Jewish system) would be destroyed in 70 AD and be replaced by the new heavens and earth (the Messianic system). Heb 12:25 predicted this destruction of the current heavens and earth, leaving the new heavens and earth that could not be shaken or destroyed. 

Also 2 Peter 3:13 Peter said “according to promise” they were looking for a new heavens and earth. What promise was he referring to? The only promise of a new heavens and earth is from Isaiah 65:17; 66:22 where the context is the new Messianic system, the new Jerusalem, a time when believers would come to worship on earth (66:23,24). It is not predicting a re-creation of the cursed earth. 

3) John:

John 21:22 If I (Jesus) want him (John) to stay alive till I come, what is that to you (Peter)? John then comments in 21:23 that some thought that meant that John would never die (if 21:22 is predicting a 2nd coming that hasn’t happened in the last 2,000 years, then John would indeed not die in the first century). But if 21:22 is referring to a 2nd coming in that generation, then John could indeed live to see that. Some say John died a natural death, an old man of 100 living in Ephesus. But the church father Papias in the late 1st/ early 2nd century said that John died a martyr’s death just as Jesus predicted in Mark 10:35-40 at the hands of the Jews. Jesus had predicted that John would drink the same cup as Jesus would (Mk 14:36, the cup of death). Acts 12 records the death of James, John’s brother, in AD 44. So the only time the Jews could have martyred John would have to be before 70 AD, just as they martyred James the Lord’s brother before 70 AD. 

Why would early church tradition say that John lived to the age of 100. Probably b/c they didn’t see Revelation being fulfilled in AD 70, and therefore looked for a time when John might have been exiled to Patmos after 70 AD, and then came up with the theory that he was exiled in the reign of Domitian in 96 AD and that Revelation was written in 96 AD and was fulfilled after 70 AD. We wil see later that both these views are wrong in an article on the book of Revelation. . 

1 John 2:18 Children, it is the last hour. Last hour of what? Of the last days of the Jewish Age.

Rev 1:2-7 Things to shortly take place (tachos: Speed, swiftness, quickness)
. The time is near (1:3 eggus: Near, close, at hand). He is coming with the clouds (Mt 24:29; Acts 1:8), every eye will see him. 

Rev 22:6-10 Things must soon take place (tachos: Speed, swiftness, quickness). Behold I am coming quickly (tachu: Quickly, swiftly, soon). The time is near (eggus: Near, close, at hand). 

Rev 22:12,20 Behold I am coming quickly. Yes I am coming quickly. 

(Some say “quickly” just means “suddenly”, but the other phrases “near”, “shortly”, “soon” show that quickly means soon. Our modern use of the word “quickly” includes “soon” in time. The word “quickly” is an adverb that means to do something fast, soon, or after a short time. Here are some examples of “quickly” in a sentence: 

“I quickly realized that this was a big mistake”. Rev 1:7 “he is coming with the clouds” shows that it refers to the 2nd coming. 

“She walked quickly away”.  

“The disease spreads quickly”.  

mello passages in Revelation. 1:19; 2:20 3:10,16; 6:11; 8:13; 12:5

Revelation 1:19 YLT – Write the things that thou hast seen, and the things that are, and the things that are about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is (are) about to] iii ) come after these things;

Revelation 2:10 YLT – Be not afraid of the things that thou art about to [Gk: μέλλεις : melleis : are about to] suffer; lo, the devil is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] cast of you to prison, that ye may be tried, and ye shall have tribulation ten days; become thou faithful unto death, and I will give to thee the crown of the life.

Revelation 3:10,16 YLT – Because thou didst keep the word of my endurance, I also will keep thee from the hour of the trial that is about to [Gk: μελλούσης : mellouses : which is about to] come upon all the world iv, to try those dwelling upon the earth v … So ‐‐ because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I am about to [Gk: μέλλω : mello : I am about to] vomit thee out of my mouth.

Revelation 6:11 YLT – and there was given to each one white robes, and it was said to them that they may rest themselves yet a little time, till may be fulfilled also their fellow-servants and their brethren, who are about to [Gk: μέλλοντες : mellontes : are about to] be killed ‐‐ even as they.

Revelation 8:13 YLT – And I saw, and I heard one messenger, flying in the mid-heaven, saying with a great voice, ‘Wo, wo, wo, to those dwelling upon the land from the rest of the voices of the trumpet of the three messengers who are about to [Gk: μελλόντων : mellonton : are about to] sound.’

Revelation 12:5 YLT – and she brought forth a male child, who is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] rule all the nations with a rod of iron, and caught away was her child unto God and His throne.

All these passages say the things predicted in Revelation were about to be (mello) fulfilled or happen.

From parousiafulfilled.com

What would be the point of telling Christians in the 1st Century about apocalyptic events, if those things were not expected for thousands of years… after they were all dead and their world had disappeared? How could those events have any meaning or significance to 1st Century people, if they would NOT live to see and experience them? It just doesn’t make any sense.

Conversely, if those early Christians were “ABOUT TO” experience great tribulations and persecutions, they would obviously find encouragement and hope in the knowledge that “SOON” their Lord Jesus Christ was “ABOUT TO” return and rescue them from their enemies… the last wicked and perverse generation of Old Covenant Jews and their temporary Roman allies.

The obvious meaning of the Greek word “mello” throughout the New Testament is that certain things were “ABOUT TO” happen… SOON… in a very short time. And when it refers to the parousia (Second Coming) of Christ, the word “mello” was clearly intended to warn people that it was “ABOUT TO” happen, in the lifetime of those early Christians. This is exactly what Jesus promised his disciples:

“27 For, the Son of Man is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] come in the glory of his Father, with his messengers, and then he will reward each, according to his work. 28 Verily I say to you, there are certain of those standing here who shall not taste of death till they may see the Son of Man coming in his reign.” (Matthew 16:27-28 YLT)

From James Stewart Russell in The Parousia:

The doctrine of the apostles with regard to the coming of the Lord is in perfect harmony with this (i.e. Jesus’ predictions that his 2nd coming would be imminent). Nothing can be more evident than that they all believed and taught the speedy return of the Lord. From the first speech of St. Peter on the day of Pentecost to the last utterance of St. John in the Apocalypse, this conviction is clearly and constantly expressed. To say that the apostles were themselves ignorant of the time of their Lord’s return, and therefore could have no belief on the subject,—could not teach what they did not know,—is to contradict their own express and reiterated assertions. True, they did not know, and did not teach, ‘that day and that hour;’ they did not say that He would come in a particular month of a particular year, but they assuredly did give the churches to understand that He was coming quickly; that they might soon expect to see Him; and they never ceased to exhort them to maintain the attitude of constant watchfulness and preparation.

The early church expected the imminent return of Jesus within their lifetime. They were “eagerly awaiting” the coming of Jesus. As Russell pointed out: Why did they expect an imminent 2nd coming? the answer is simple. Jesus and the apostles told them that it would be imminent. Case closed.

THE 2ND COMING OF JESUS (Part 1)

  • The 2nd coming of Jesus is one of great importance and the Bible has a lot to say about it. Let’s look at some verses that talk about the nearness of Christ’s coming. Read the verses and answer the questions. 

1. Read Matthew 10:23. Jesus would come before the disciples had a chance to do what? _____________________________________________________________________________

The apostles would preach the gospel to the entire Roman Empire before 70 AD. Jesus said that he would come before they barely finished doing that. Mt 24:14 Jesus said that the apostles would preach the gospel throughout the world and then “the end would come”. Jesus was answering the question they asked him in 24:3 “what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age (aeon, a period of time; not kosmos which is the word for the physical world). The 2nd coming and end of the age occur at the same time. The apostles must finish their mission before that happens, and they did. When Paul wrote Colossians in about 62 AD, he said that the gospel had been proclaimed in all creation under heaven”.

2. Read Matthew 16:27-28

From verse 27. Jesus was going to come with His angels to do what? ______________________

______________________________________________________________________________

From verse 28. Jesus’ coming would be so soon that some of the disciples would still be what? _______________________________

2 points are critical here. 1) The meaning of the word mello. “Jesus is about to come” (mello). 2) Some listening to him predict this coming would still be alive when it came to pass.

Matthew 16:27-28.

  • Depending on your translation, the verse says Jesus “Shall” come or “Will” come, etc… The original Greek word for “shall” or “will” is the word “mello.” 
  • Mello always means “about to happen, about to be at a place”. Some say it just mean “certainly to happen, sure to happen”, but that is not how it is used over and over in the NT.
  • Correctly translated verse 27 should read, “the Son of Man is about to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and then He will reward each according to his works.”
  • And according to verse 28, Jesus said that some of those he was talking to would still be alive to see Him coming in his kingdom.
  • This is a judgment passage. Some say 16:27-28 was fulfilled on the day of Pentecost in 30 AD in Acts 2, but Acts 2 is not a coming in judgment passage. Acts 2 would occur within a year or so after Jesus spoke Mt 16:27-28. It doesn’t make sense that Jesus would add that “some would still be alive” if the event he was predicting would be within a year or so. But if the event was to occur 40 years later (which it did in 70 AD), then that would make more sense.
  • As we go through the study keep the word “mello” in your mind.
  • Uses of the word mello in the New Testament. 

USE OF “MELLO” TO WARN OF IMMINENT ACTIONS OR EVENTS.

That Greek word “mello” appears 110 times in various forms in the NT. Here are more examples: 

Matt 2:13 – Now when they had departed, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, “Rise, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you, for Herod is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] search for the child, to destroy him.”

Matt 20:22 – Jesus answered, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I am [Gk: μέλλω : mello : I am about to] to drink?” They said to him, “We are able.” 

Mark 10:32 – And they were on the road, going up to Jerusalem, and Jesus was walking ahead of them. And they were amazed, and those who followed were afraid. And taking the twelve again, he began to tell them what was [Gk: μέλλοντα : mellonta : about to] to happen to him 

Luke 7:2 – Now a centurion had a servant1 who was sick and at the point of death [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to], who was highly valued by him.

Luke 9:31 – who appeared in glory and spoke of his departure, which he was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] accomplish at Jerusalem.

Luke 9:44 – “Let these words sink into your ears: The Son of Man is about to [Gk: μέλλει : mellei : is about to] be delivered into the hands of men.”

Zacchaeus ran on ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see Jesus, for he was about to (Gk:ἤμελλεν) pass that way …Luke 19:4

– CC Image courtesy of Good News Productions International and College Press Publishing … FreeBibleimages.org

Luke 10:1 – After this the Lord appointed seventy-two others and sent them on ahead of him, two by two, into every town and place where he himself was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] go.

Luke 19:4 – So he ran on ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see him, for he was about to [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to] pass that way.

Luke 22:23 – And they began to question one another, which of them it could be who was going to [Gk: μέλλων : mellon : was about to] do this. 

John 4:47 – When this man heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee, he went to him and asked him to come down and heal his son, for he was at the point of death [Gk: ἤμελλεν : emellen : was about to].

We can clearly see from the passages above that certain events were “ABOUT TO” happen… IMMEDIATELY or very SOON after.

  • Matthew 2 – King Herod soon searched for the infant Jesus, just as predicted.
  • Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 9 – The suffering and crucifixion of Jesus did occur within a short time, just as predicted.
  • Luke 19 – Jesus did in fact pass the sycamore tree, soon after Zacchaeus climbed up to see him, just as predicted.

“Mello” means that something is IMMINENT and “ABOUT TO HAPPEN”. It never means “MANY YEARS FROM NOW” or “SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE” or “2000 YEARS FROM NOW”! Yet that is what some Bible translators want us to believe, whenever “mello” is used in a passage about the parousia (Second Coming) of Christ. It is never used to simply mean “certianly will happen” which is the way it is translated in most translations. Why would the translators not translate correctly as “about to happen”? They might translate it “about to happen” in passages that are not eschatological ones, but they would have problems translating the 2nd coming as “about to happen” b/c of almost 2,00 years of church dogma that said that the 2nd coming had not happened yet. A few translations like Young’s Literal Translation translate mello as “about to happen” correctly even in the eschatological passages we have discussed.

3. Read Matthew 24:29-34. 

From verse 29. What did Jesus say would happen to the sun, moon, and stars? _______________

______________________________________________________________________________

From verse 30. When this happened to the sun, moon, and stars, who or what did Jesus say would appear? _________________________________________________________________

From verse 34. When did Jesus say the things in verse 29 and 30 would take place? __________

______________________________________________________________________________

Bottom line, Jesus said that the stars would fall and the coming of the Son of Man would happen before “this generation would pass away”. So it is critical that we understand what the word genea means and how it is used in the New Testament.

The Greek word genea. 

  • The word generation is from the Greek word “genea”.
  • Genea always means a period of about 40 years
  • This is very similar to how we use the phrases baby boomers generation or X generation.
  • Genea never means the Jewish “race” with an indefinite time. Many try to define genea as the Jewish race but over and over the word is not used like that.
  • In the chapter prior to Mt 24, Jesus had just predicted God’s vengeance on the Jewish nation b/c they had killed the prophets. Mt 23:36 “all these things will come upon this generation”. That obviously refers to the Jews living at that time, and not to the Jewish race in general. This is right before 24:34. Why would the word not mean the same in 24:34 as it does in 23:36?
  • Matthew 1 is a good example of how the word “genea” is used.    
  • Notice that Mt 1:2-16 list lists individual people who lived and died. 
  • Each individual person represents a generation (genea).
  • This is why verse 17 says, “So all the generations [genea] from Abraham to David are fourteen generations, from David until the captivity in Babylon are fourteen generations [genea], and from the captivity in Babylon until the Christ are fourteen generations [genea]”. The meaning of “genea” is a period of about 40 years or the people living in a period of about 40 years. We use the term tha way when we speak of the baby boomers’ generation, the x generation, the z generation, etc.
  • And so when Jesus said in Matthew 24:34 that everything had to take place in that generation He was saying those things would take place in the lifetime of the people who lived at that time.
  • If still uncertain about the meaning of genea, remember Mt 16:27-28. Jesus said some of those he was talking to would still be alive when he returned. That is clear and certain. 
  • Here is a site of the use of genea in the New Testament. https://www.logosapostolic.org/greek-word-studies/1074-genea-generation.htm
  • Matthew 1:17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon to Christ are fourteen generations.
  • 11:16 But to what shall I liken this generation? It is like children sitting in the markets, and calling to their fellows,
  • 12:39 But he answered and said to them, An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonah:
  • 12:41 The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and, behold, a greater than Jonah is here.
  • 12:42 The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the utmost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here.
  • 12:43 When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walks through dry places, seeking rest, and finds none.
  • 12:44 Then he says, I will return into my house from where I came out; and when he comes, he finds it empty, swept, and garnished.
  • 12:45 Then goes he, and takes with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also to this wicked generation.
  • 16:4 A wicked and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonah. And he left them, and departed.
  • 17:17 Then Jesus answered and said, O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? how long shall I suffer you? bring him here to me.
  • 23:36 Amen I say to you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
  • 24:34 Amen I say to you, This generation shall not pass, until all these things are fulfilled.
  • Acts 2:40 And with many other words he testified and exhorted, saying, Save yourselves from this crooked generation.
  • Acts 8:33 In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth.
    Acts 13:36 For David, after he had served his own generation by the will of God, fell asleep, and was laid to his fathers, and saw corruption:
  • Hebrews 3:10 Therefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do always err in their heart; and they have not known my ways.

Notice all the things in Mt 24 that Jesus said would happen in that generation.

  • 24:14 The gospel would be preached to all nations and then “the end” would come. That can’t be the end of the world if it had to happen in that generation It refers to the end of the Jewish Age, a phase used in Daniel 12:4,9,13 to predict the end of the age in 70 AD. The gospel was indeed preached to all the nations before 70 AD according to Paul (Colossians 1:23). 
  • 24:15 The “abomination of desolation” of the temple as predicted by Daniel 9:26,27; 12:11 would be fulfilled in that generation. That could only refer to the destruction of the temple by the Romans 40 years later in 70 AD. Daniel 12:11 the abomination of desolation would mark the “end”, the “end of the days” (12:13), just as in Mt 24.
  • 24:21 “At that time” (the same time as the abomination of desolation) great tribulation would occur such as never before occurred. This was predicted also by Daniel 12:1 and referred to tribulation the Jews endured during the siege and destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. This does not refer to a tribulation that is still in our future as many claim in their pre and post tributlation theories of the 2nd coming. 24:21 refers to a tribulation of suffering the Jewish people would endure in the events of the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. According to Josephus, over a million Jews died through the famine in the city or at the hands of the Romans, and another 200 thousand were carried into captivity.
  • 24:29-30 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days” the sun and moon will be darkened and the stars will fall, the tribes of the earth will mourn (i.e. the Jews who crucified Jesus), they (i.e. those tribes) will see the Son of Man coming in the clouds. Unless the stars literally fell in that generation, this must be figurative language, just as used to describe the fall of Babylon (Isaiah 13:10, 13 the stars cease giving light and the earth shaken out of its place), the fall of Egypt (Isaiah 19:1 the Lord riding on a swift cloud to come to judge Egypt), and the fall of Edom (Isaiah 34:4 the heavens will be rolled up like a scroll and all the hosts or stars will fall). That is typical figurative judgment language that is also used in Mt 24:29-30.
  • 24:30 “the tribes will mourn and they will see the coming of the Son of Man in power and glory”. This had to occur within that generation, within the next 40 years. Jesus did come in judgment on the Jews in 70 AD. Did they actually see the body of Jesus coming on a cloud or does this simply mean that He came in judgment by sending the Romans to judge the Jews? It doesn’t matter. He came back within that generation and this must refer to 70 AD.
  • Notice the chronological sequence of events as outlined above. The abomination of desolation, “at that time” a tribulation on the Jews, “immediately after the tribulation” the 2nd coming, “this generation will not pass away till all these things take place”. You can’t pull the tribulation out of that sequence and say that it is predicting something at least 2,000 years later.

Does Mt 24 discuss one coming back of Jesus or two? 

Many say that Mt 24:1-35 predicts events to occur in that generation, but that 24:36-51 changes to a discussion of a coming of Jesus in the distant future (going on 2,000 years now). 

  • Why would anyone think that Jesus changed the topic of his predictions in 24:1-35? 
  • Notice 24:40-41. One man taken, one left at the coming of the Son of Man, just like in the flood. One woman taken, one left. In the flood, the one taken was the wicked and they were destroyed. The one left was Noah and family, the righteous. That also fits the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The wicked Jews were destroyed and the righteous Jews escaped and went to Pella according to Eusebius. This shows that the discussion of 24:36-51 is still discussing 70 AD and not some distant future coming of Jesus. 
  • Many try to use 24:40-41 to describe the rapture or taking up of the righteous at some future coming of Jesus, but that is just the opposite of the meaning of 24:40-41. 

Mt 23:34-36 In this passage spoken just before Mt 24, Jesus said that “generation” (genea) of Jews would be judged because of their killing of the Old Testament prophets and the apostles whom he would send out. Notice the use of genea in 23:36. 

The parallel account of the Olivet Discourse in Mt 24 is also found in Luke 21. Notice all the things that Luke said would happen within that generation (21:32).

  • 21:20 When you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies (i.e. the Roman armies).
  • 21:36 Pray that you have the strength to escape all the things that are about to take place (mello again). This confirms that the events in Mt 24 were “about to take place”.  This verse is critical. Luke 21 describes the same events as Mt 24. Lk 21:32 just like Mt 24:34 says that “this generation wll not pass until all has taken place”. But the addition of Lk 21:36 says that all the events predicted in Lk 21 were “about to take place”. That means that the word “generation” in 21:32 can’t mean just the “Jewish race” over the next 2,00 years. It must mean a period of 40 years and the Jews living at that time.

4. Read Matthew 24:62-64. 

From verse 64. What did Jesus say Caiaphas the high priest would see. ___________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

Jesus said that Caiaphas would see the Son of Man coming on the clouds. So did he? Did he live till at least the start of the Jewish War in 67 AD (the coming of the son of Man referred to the period of coming in judgment and not just one day in the year 70 AD when the tempe was finally destroyed). If Caiaphas did not live to see the coming of the Son of Man, then is Jesus a false prophet?

From revelation revolution.org this quote:

Caiaphas Probably Lived to Witness the Jewish War: Though it is not Known when Caiaphas Died, He may have lived to Witness at Least the Start of the Jewish War Since He was Probably Younger than His Father-in-Law Who was 87 when the Jewish War Began.

Historically the Jewish high priest served in this role for life.  However, this changed during the Roman Empire when high priests were essentially Roman puppets who served out their terms until they fell out of favor and were deposed.  Caiaphas served as high priest from A.D. 18 to around A.D. 36 when he was deposed by the proconsul Vitellius (Antiquities 18.95).  It is not known how long Caiaphas lived after this point;2 however, I believe that it is likely that he lived to witness at least the start of the Jewish War.  Caiaphas was the son-in-law of the high priest Ananus.  Ananus served as high priest until A.D. 15 when he was deposed at the age of 36.  It is also not known when Ananus died, but if Ananus was 36 in A.D. 15 he would have been 87 at the start of the Jewish War in A.D. 66.  Since Caiaphas was Ananus’ son-in-law Caiaphas was probably younger than that at the time.  Though it is not known when Caiaphas died based on his probable age range it is certainly quite likely that he survived to witness the beginning of the Jewish War in A.D. 66.

Caiaphas and Ananus Probably Lived to Witness the Jewish War: The High Priest Addressed by Jesus in Mark 14:61-62 also appears to be Ananus.  Ananus also may have survived to see Jesus coming on the Clouds of Heaven. (Just like Jesus predicted).

That’s it! Those are the only 4 second coming predictions in the gospels! 

These are the only 4 passages in Matthew (or in the parallel gospels of Mark and Luke) where Jesus predicts a coming back. All 4 predict a coming back (2nd coming) within the lifetime or generation of those he was talking to. 

  • Atheists, Muslims, and non Christian Jews all say that Jesus was a false prophet since they say his predictions of an imminent 2nd coming did not come true.
  • William Miller predicted the 2nd coming would happen in 1843 AD but it did not happed (the event was called “the great disappointment”). Therefore he was a false prophet.
  • There have been over 200 such predictions of the 2nd coming by various false prophets and none of those predictions came true. 

What do you think? If Jesus’ 2nd coming was not in that generation as he predicted, would he be a false prophet also? _________________________________________________________________________

The quote of C.S.Lewis is interesting. 

When referring to the predictions of Jesus concerning his 2nd coming, C.S. Lewis in his essay “The World’s Last Night” concludes that at least one of the prophecies of Jesus was a failed one:

“Say what you like,” we shall be told, “the apocalyptic beliefs of the first Christians have been proved to be false. It is clear from the New Testament that they all expected the Second Coming in their own lifetime. And, worse still, they had a reason, and one which you will find very embarrassing. Their Master had told them so. He shared, and indeed created, their delusion. He said in so many words, ‘This generation shall not pass till all these things be done.’ And he was wrong. He clearly knew no more about the end of the world than anyone else.” [the above paragraph is what C.S. Lewis puts in the mouth of imaginary critics. In the next paragraph, he responds to the criticism]

It is certainly the most embarrassing verse in the Bible. Yet how teasing, also, that within fourteen words of it should come the statement “But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.” The one exhibition of error and the one confession of ignorance grow side by side.

Not everyone can accept C.S.Lewis’ response and still have faith in Jesus

Here is the quote of an atheist, Bertrand Russell. 

Bertrand Russell, in his essay “Why I Am Not A Christian” says this:

For one thing, he certainly thought that His second coming would occur in clouds of glory before the death of all the people who were living at that time. There are a great many texts that prove that. He says, for instance, “Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel till the Son of Man be come.” Then he says, “There are some standing here which shall not taste death till the Son of Man comes into His kingdom”; and there are a lot of places where it is quite clear that He believed that His second coming would happen during the lifetime of many then living.

But maybe he predicted an imminent 2nd coming but delayed it. 

Many will admit that Jesus predicted that his 2nd coming would be in that generation, but they say that he “delayed” his coming.

  • Hebrews 10:37 puts that theory to rest. For yet in a very little while, He who is coming will come and will not delay. 
  • The reason many say he delayed his coming is because they, just like most of the Jews living when Jesus came the first time, are looking for Jesus to set up a physical kingdom when he comes the 2nd time. That is why most of the Jews rejected Jesus as the Messiah. 
  • He did set up His kingdom in the first century. He preached “the kingdom (i.e. the kingdom of Daniel 2:44) is at hand”, so it had to come soon after that or he would be a false prophet. He said in John 18:36 that his kingdom was not of this world. He never intended to set up a physical kingdom, back then or any time in the future. 
  • In Mt 16:28 he said that some would still be alive to see him coming “in his kingdom”.
  • In Mt 16:16-18 He equated the kingdom with the church and gave Peter the keys to the kingdom. Did Peter use those keys to let people into the kingdom? Yes. In Acts 2 Peter preached the first gospel sermon and 3,000 were baptized, becoming Christians and entering the church kingdom.
  • Paul said in Colossians 1:13 You have been translated into the kingdom of His beloved Son. 
  • In Rev 1:6 John said that Jesus had formed the Christians into a kingdom, priest to God the Father. 

A Challenge:

Obviously the only “coming back”, i.e. a 2nd coming, that Jesus predicted was to occur within that generation of those living when he spoke to them. I challenge you to find a verse anywhere in the gospels where He predicted a coming (a 3rd coming?) that would not be within that generation (one that still hasn’t happened going on 2,000 years now)

Write out the verse here and where you found it (if you find it). 

_____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________

If you do not find it, then isn’t it strange that in the synoptic gospels that Jesus never predicted a coming back that would not happen within that generation? Why would church dogma for 2,000 years use these verses we have studied in this lesson to predict a coming back in our future except that they didn’t understand the passages correctly. They were looking for a 2nd coming that would end the world and a 2nd coming in 70 AD did not fit their expectations.

In the next lesson, we will look at what the apostles said about the 2nd coming. 

PHILIPPIANS


Here is a map of Paul’s voyage to Rome as a prisoner when he appealed to Caesar. Notice the island of Crete where they planned to spend the winter but the hurricane winds blew them out to sea for 14 days out of control. Notice the island of Malta where they shipwrecked and Paul was bitten by a poisonous snake but unharmed. Notice Rome where he spent 2 years in house arrest and wrote the prison epistles of Ephesians, Pilippians, Colossian, and Philemon.
 

Here is a great introduction to the letter. From blueletterbible.org https://www.blueletterbible.org/study/eo/phl/phl000.cfm

Introduction to Philippians

AUTHOR: The apostle Paul (Phl 1:1), joined in his salutation by Timothy. Personal references by the author (Phl 1:12-142:19-243:4-74:15-16) are certainly consistent with what we know of Paul from other New Testament sources. Paul’s authorship of this letter is also supported by the testimony of early “church fathers” such as Polycarp and Irenaeus.

THE CITY OF PHILIPPI: Named after Philip of Macedonia, the father of Alexander the Great, it was a major city of Macedonia on the road from Rome to Asia known as the Egnatian Way. It was the site of a famous battle in 42 B.C. in which Antony and Octavius defeated Brutus and Cassius. In 30 B.C., Octavian made the town a Roman colony where retired soldiers could live and enjoy the full privileges of Roman citizenship (to which Paul may have alluded in Phl 3:20).

THE CHURCH AT PHILIPPI: During his second missionary journey (49-52 A.D.), Paul and his traveling companions (Timothy and Silas) were making their way across Asia Minor (Turkey) when Paul received a vision at Troas. In the vision, a man of Macedonia pleaded, “Come over to Macedonia and help us.” Perceiving that the Lord was calling them to go to Macedonia, they sailed from Troas (Luke having joined them) and eventually arrived at Philippi (Ac 16:6-12).

With the conversion of Lydia (Ac 16:13-15) and the Philippian jailor (Ac 16:25-34), the church was established at Philippi. The lack of a synagogue seems to indicate that Jews were not prevalent and so the church may have consisted primarily of Gentiles. From the conversion of Lydia and references in the epistle itself (Phl 4:2-3), it is evident that a number of women played a role in the growth of the church.

When it became necessary for Paul to leave, Luke seems to have stayed at Philippi (based upon careful observations of personal pronouns; e.g., “we, they”, cf. Ac 16:1217:1). As Paul left Macedonia, the church at Philippi became a significant source of support (Phl 4:15-162 Co 11:9).

Paul visited the church at Philippi again on his third missionary journey (Ac 20:3,6).

TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING: Philippians is one of Paul’s four “prison epistles” (Phl 1:7,13,17; cf. Ephesians, Colossians, and Philemon). The general consensus is that these epistles were written during Paul’s imprisonment at Rome (cf. Ac 28:16,30-31). If such is truly the case, then Paul wrote Philippians around 61-63 A.D. from Rome.

PURPOSE OF THE EPISTLE: The church at Philippi had sent a gift to Paul in Rome by the hand of Epaphroditus (Phl 4:10,18). Paul uses this occasion not only to thank them, but to comfort them concerning his situation as a prisoner for Jesus Christ (Phl 1:12-14). He also writes of his plans to send Timothy soon (Phl 2:19-24), and why he considered it necessary to send Epaphroditus back to them (Phl 2:25-30). There may have also been a problem at Philippi involving two women, for Paul has a few words to say concerning them (Phl 4:2-3).

THEME OF THE EPISTLE: Throughout this short and rather personal epistle, one keynote resounds again and again. That keynote is joy. Five times the word “joy” (Grk., chara) is found (Phl 1:4,252:2,294:1), and the verb “to rejoice” (Grk., chairein) occurs eleven times (twice in Phl 1:182:17,184:4; once in Phl 2:283:14:10). For this reason, the epistle to the Philippians has often been called Paul’s “hymn of joy” in which the theme is: “Rejoice in the Lord!”

KEY VERSE: Philippians 4:4

“Rejoice in the Lord always. Again I will say, rejoice!”

Here is a map of Paul’s 2nd missionary journey during which he established the church at Philippi.

From an article by Brian Tabb:

Joy is “a feeling of great pleasure and happiness.” It’s the emotion we feel when life is good — when the sun is shining, when our team is winning, when we are healthy, happy, and heartened. Most people do not typically speak of the happiness of heartbreak, the pleasure of migraines, or the bliss of losing.

Philippians is the most joyful book in the Bible — the apostle Paul uses the Greek words for joy and rejoicing sixteen times in only 104 verses. And yet he writes from a dingy Roman prison, a place we would typically associate with misery and trial, which most people assume are the opposites of joy. He’s surrounded by every conceivable obstacle to joy, so why does he seem so happy?

Here is a neat list of the 7 topics covered in the letter. from blueletterbible.org. I will try to make note of most of the places where the word joy or rejoice is found, which is the theme of the book.

1:1-12 A personal “prayer with joy” (1:4) for their love and faith and enduring suffering with him for the gospel.

  1. List the 7 main sections of this epistle.
    • 1)1:12-26 The situation in Rome. Paul circumstances, i.e. as a prisoner, had turned out for the good of the gospel b/c he had been allowed freedom under house arrest to preach the gospel which led to the conversion of some of the Praetorian Guard (a special guard to protect the emperor). He could even “rejoice” (1:18) that some were trying to undermine him and yet at least they were preaching Christ. A similar thing happened on his visit to Philippi when he and Silas were put in prison and yet were singing songs of joy and praise to God which led to the conversion of the jailor and his household. When bad things or circumstances happen to you, can you look for how God might use your bad circumstances to spread the gospel and help others?
    • 2) 1:19-30 Exhortation to behavior worthy of the gospel even if they had to suffer for their faith as Paul did. He would “rejoice” (1:18) knowing their prayers and the Holy Spirit might lead to his freedom from prison. Paul went on to say that he would actually prefer to die and go to be with Jesus (to die is gain) but that he would probably get out of prison (at least this first imprisonment for he would end up being beheaded in his 2nd imprisonment later) which would allow him to preach the gospel more (to live is Christ’ benefit). The Philippian Christians continued to suffer after Paul left after establishing the church there (he left b/c Jews followed him to the city to try to kill him and he had to flee). So there might be a tendency for them to be ashamed of Paul being a prisoner as if he were a convict. They should not be ashamed of his suffering.
    • 3) 2:1-18 He urges them to “comlete his joy” (2:2) by being united in love. He gives an admonition to have the same attitude of humility as Jesus did in giving up equality with God to lower himself to become a man and die a suffering death. Seek not your own interests, but put the interests of others ahead of yours, just like Jesus did. Work out your salvation with fear and trembling for it is God working in you to do His will and pleasure. Don’t grumble and complain, which is what many do when things are not going well. Be lights in a dark ungodly world of darkness. He will be “glad and rejoice” with them even if he ends up dying in prison (2:17). “Be glad and rejoice with me” (2:18).
    • 4) 2:19-30 Plans involving Timothy and Epaphroditus. Paul praises Timothy, his child in the faith, for his unselfish service to others and planned to send him to Philippi to tell them how he was doing. He also praised Epaphroditus, who had almost died serving Paul and the Philippians. He knew they would “rejoice” to see Epaphroditus (2:28) so “receive him with all joy” (2:29).
    • 5) 3:1-21 So “rejoice in the Lord” 3:1, but he gives warnings against the Judaizers who were trying make Gentile Christians keep the Law of Moses and even getting Jewish Christians to put their trust in Law keeping instead of Jesus and the grace of God. Paul said that he was righteous under the Law but that righteousness could not save him. Instead he found the righteousness which is by faith in Jesus that did save him. He had put his past behind him and was pressing on toward the goal of the prize of eternal life. He encouraged the readers to do the same and to beware of the Judaizers who whose god was their belly (preaching for money) and who enemies of the cross and the grace in Christ. HIs citizenship was in heaven, not on earth.
    • 6) 4:1-9 The Philippians were his “joy and crown” (4:1). I know my converts in mission work and Christian education, however many they may be, will be my joy and reward when I die. He urges two women members, who apparently are having conflict, to get along. He gives the famous “rejoice in the Lord always, again I say rejoice 4:4 (the simple song with those words). The coming of the Lord was “at hand”. The early church lived in constant expectation that Jesus would come back in their lifetime, just as Jesus predicted that he would. The apostles also predicted that. My favorite verses, 4:6-7. Be anxious in nothing, but in everything give thanks and the peace of God wil guard your hearts and minds (although I still worry too much). Let your mind dwell on good things, not worldly or bad things. Exhortations to unity, joy, and peace
    • 7) 4:10-20 He “rejoiced” (4:10) that they had sent him supplies through Epaphroditus while he was in prison to meet his needs, although he assures them that he had learned the secret of “contentment” in whatever circumstances he was in, whether good or bad. They had sent him support when he worked left Philippi to go preach in Athens and Corinth. Paul would never accept money from the people he was preaching to in any location, but he did accept their help while establishing the church in Corinth so that he could spend more time preaching instead of supporting himself fully by tent making. He was confident that God would supply the needs of the Philippians in the future. He gives thanks for their generosityd

4:21-23 He closes the letter with greetings from the saints in Rome and from members of Caesar’s household that apparently had been converted.

Here is the outline given in blueletterbible.org It is a great outline to use your study of the letter.

https://www.blueletterbible.org/study/eo/phl/phl000.cfm

Also helpful in the outline you can click on the verses referred to in each point and they will pop up.

Here are some OT verses on joy.

  • Psalm 37:4: “Delight yourself in the Lord”  
  • Psalm 32:11: “Be glad in the Lord and rejoice”  
  • Psalm 16:11: “In your presence there is fullness of joy; at your right hand are pleasures forevermore”  
  • Psalm 118:24: “This is the day which the LORD hath made; We will rejoice and be glad in it”  
  • Isaiah 61:10: “I will have much joy in the Lord. My soul will have joy in my God”  
  • Psalm 30:5: For his anger lasts only a moment, but his favor lasts a lifetime; weeping may stay for the night, but rejoicing comes in the morning.
  • Proverbs 10:28: “The prospect of the righteous is joy, but the hopes of the wicked come to nothing”  
  • Psalm 126:4-6: “The Lord has done great things for us, and we are filled with joy”  
  • Psalm 28:7: “My heart leaps for joy and I will give thanks to him in song”  
  • Proverbs 17:22 ~ A joyful heart is good medicine, but a crushed spirit dries up the bones.
  • Psalms 47:1 Clap your hands, all you nations; shout to God with cries of joy.
  • Isaiah 35:10 and those the LORD has rescued will return. They will enter Zion with singing; everlasting joy will crown their heads. Gladness and joy will overtake them, and sorrow and sighing will flee away.
  • Ecclesiastes 9:7 Go, eat your food with gladness, and drink your wine with a joyful heart, for God has already approved what you do.
  • Nehemiah 8:10  Nehemiah said, “Go and enjoy choice food and sweet drinks, and send some to those who have nothing prepared. This day is holy to our Lord. Do not grieve, for the joy of the LORD is your strength.” (The song The joy of the Lord will be my strength).
  • Psalm 100:1 Make a joyful noise to the Lord, all the earth!  Serve the Lord with gladness!
        Come into his presence with singing!
  • Psalms 27:6 Then my head will be exalted above the enemies who surround me; at his sacred tent I will sacrifice with shouts of joy; I will sing and make music to the LORD.



Here are some good NT verses.

Romans 14:17  For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit,

John 16:22 So with you: Now is your time of grief, but I will see you again and you will rejoice, and no one will take away your joy.

Romans 15:13 May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace as you trust in him, so that you may overflow with hope by the power of the Holy Spirit.

1 Peter 1:8-9 8 Though you have not seen him, you love him; and even though you do not see him now, you believe in him and are filled with an inexpressible and glorious joy,9 for you are receiving the end result of your faith, the salvation of your souls.

James 1:2-3 2 Consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of many kinds,3 because you know that the testing of your faith produces perseverance.

Galatians 5:22 ~ But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,

Romans 12:12 ~ Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer.

Romans 12:15 Rejoice with those who rejoice, weep with those who weep.

IN CONCLUSION:

Christians ought to be the most joyful and happiest people on earth b/c of the hope of eternal life. Even when we are suffering greatly, we can rejoice knowing that we have an eternal place of joy waiting for us where there will be no pain or death. We can have internal everlasting joy even while on earth even when we are crying on the outside for whatever reason. So why am I not happier and more joyful? Maybe it is b/c my mind is not “set on the things that are above, but instead set on the things of the earth” (Colossian 3:1-4).

Jesus is our example. Hebrews 12: 2 fixing our eyes on Jesus, the pioneer and perfecter of faith. For the joy set before him he endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. He was not laughing or happy on the cross. He was suffering so much that he prayed, “My God, my God, why hast Thou forsaken me”. And yet he kept the prospect of being reunited with the Father after his ascension before him as his motivation to endure.

Here are some ways to be more joyful in the Lord: From the internet:

  • Spend time with God: Consistently spending time in God’s presence can increase joy.  
  • Remember God’s goodness: Meditate on God’s goodness and faithfulness to you.  
  • Express gratitude: Thank God for His blessings.  
  • Read the Bible: Make reading the Bible a priority and try to understand what you can learn about God as a person.  
  • Pray: Pray throughout the day, even for small things, or to praise God.  
  • Ask for more: Ask God for more, even if you feel guilty about it.  
  • Find God everywhere: Try to find God in everyday life.  
  • Have a clear conscience: Unaddressed sin can diminish joy.  
  • Prioritize God’s Word: Consider who you listen to the most and how their words encourage or discourage your meditation on God’s Word.  

My prayer is that we can all be more joyful in the Lord at all times. “Rejoice in the Lord always, and again I say rejoice” (Phil 4:4).

COLOSSIANS

There is not much original material here but a few thoughts on application and a few good images.

Copied from gotquestions.org or from blueletterbible.org https://www.blueletterbible.org/study/eo/Col/Col000.cfm

Author: The apostle Paul was the primary writer of the Book of Colossians (Colossians 1:1).

Date of Writing: The Book of Colossians was likely written between A.D. 58-62. The letter was part of the 4 “prison epistles” that Paul wrote during his 2 years of imprisonment (“house arrest”) in Rome at the end of his voyage to Rome when he appealed to have his trial before Caesar (the right of a Roman citizen, which he was).

Taken from gotquestions.org or from blueletterbible.org. https://www.blueletterbible.org/study/eo/Col/Col000.cfm

THE CITY OF COLOSSE: The city was located about 100 miles east of Ephesus in Asia Minor (modern day Turkey). Together with Hieropolis (Col 4:13) and Laodicea (Col 2:14:13-16.Re 3:14-22.), Colosse made up a tri-city area. Each city had its own distinction:

  • Hierapolis, a place for health, pleasure, and relaxation
  • Laodicea, known for its commercial trade and politics
  • Colosse, known simply as a small town

Colosse was mostly a pagan city, with a strong intermingling of Jews (in 62 B.C., there were 11,000 Jewish freemen in the tri-city area). This may explain the nature of some of the problems that arose among the church in Colosse (problems with both pagan and Jewish origin).

THE CHURCH AT COLOSSE: The establishment of the church is uncertain. At issue is whether Paul himself had ever been there. Some suggest that Paul may have done some work there during his third journey, on the way to Ephesus (cf. Ac 18:2319:1). Others point out that Paul’s comments imply that he had not personally been in Colosse (cf. Col 2:1). One possibility is that the church was established during Paul’s extended stay at Ephesus, where the effect of his work spread throughout Asia Minor (cf. Ac 19:8-10). It may not have been Paul himself, but one of his co-workers who went out to Colosse. Paul’s remarks in the epistle indicate that Epaphras was the one who preached the gospel there (Col 1:5-8) and in Hierapolis and Laodicea (Col 4:12-13). Though he was with Paul at the time the epistle was written, Epaphras is identified as “one of you” (Col 4:12), suggesting that he may have originally been from Colosse.

Other members of the church at Colosse included Philemon, Apphia, and Archippus, who may have been father, mother, and son. By comparing the epistle to the Colossians with that written to Philemon, it is reasonable to suppose that the church at Colosse met in their home (cf. Col 4:17. with Phe 1-2., and the references to Archippus). If Philemon and his family were hosts of the church at Colosse, then Onesimus (Philemon’s slave) would have also been a member there upon his return (cf. Col 4:7-9 with Phe 8-16).

TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING: Colossians is one of Paul’s four “prison epistles” (Col 4:18.; cf. Ephesians, Philippians, and Philemon). The general consensus is that these epistles were written during Paul’s imprisonment at Rome (cf. Ac 28:16,30-31). If such is truly the case, then Paul wrote Colossians around 61-63 A.D. from Rome. The indication is that the epistles to the Colossians, Philemon and the Ephesians were carried to their destination by Tychicus and Onesimus (cf. Col 4:7-9Phile 10-12.Eph 6:21-22).

PURPOSE OF THE EPISTLE: Paul had received a report of the situation at Colosse by way of Epaphras (Col 1:7-8). This report was for the most part favorable (Col 2:5). But the subject matter in the epistle strongly suggests that the church was facing a two-fold danger as described below.

Purpose of Writing: Paul wrote Colossians to warn the believers of doctrinal error and to spur them to continued growth in Christ. The first half of the Book of Colossians is a theological treatise that includes one of the most profound presentations of “Christology”anywhere in the New Testament. The second half is a mini-ethics course, addressing every area of Christian life. Paul progresses from the individual life to the home and family, from work to the way we should treat others. The theme of this book is the Lordship of Jesus Christ and His sufficiency in meeting our needs in every area.

Here is a great article on “what is Christology” from gotquestions.org

The word “Christology” comes from two Greek words meaning “Christ / Messiah” and “word” – which combine to mean “the study of Christ.” Christology is the study of the Person and work of Jesus Christ. There are numerous important questions that Christology answers:

Who is Jesus Christ? Almost every major religion teaches that Jesus was a prophet, or a good teacher, or a godly man. The problem is, the Bible tells us that Jesus was infinitely more than a prophet, a good teacher, or a godly man.

Is Jesus God? Did Jesus ever claim to be God? Although Jesus never uttered the words “I am God,” He made many other statements that can’t be properly interpreted to mean anything else.

What is the hypostatic union? How can Jesus be both God and man at the same time? The Bible teaches that Jesus is both fully human and fully divine, that there is no mixture or dilution of either nature, and that He is one united Person, forever.

Why is the virgin birth so important? The virgin birth is a crucial biblical doctrine because it accounts for the circumvention of the transmission of the sin nature and allowed the eternal God to become a perfect man.
What does it mean that Jesus is the Son of God? Jesus is not God’s Son in the sense of how we think of a father/son relationship. God did not get married and have a son. Jesus is God’s Son in the sense that He is God made manifest in human form (John 1:1,14).

A Biblical understanding of Jesus Christ is crucial to our salvation. Many cults and world religions claim to believe in Jesus Christ. The problem is that they do not believe in the Jesus Christ presented in the Bible. That is why Christology is so important. It helps us to understand the significance of the deity of Christ. It demonstrates why Jesus is the atoning sacrifice for our sins. Christology teaches us that Jesus had to be man so that He could die – and had to be God so that His death would pay for our sins. It is perhaps the most important area of theology. Without a proper understanding of who Jesus Christ is and what He accomplished, all other areas of theology will be errant as well.

An in-depth study of Christology has incredible personal impact on the believer’s daily life. As we delve into the heart of Jesus, we begin to grasp the amazing concept that He, being fully Man and fully God, loves each of us with a never-ending love the extent of which is hard for us to imagine. The various titles and names of Christ in the Scriptures give insight into who He is and how He relates to us. He is our Good Shepherd, leading, protecting and caring for us as one of His own (John 10:11,14); He is the Light of the world, illuminating our pathway through a sometimes dark and uncertain world (John 8:12); He is the Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6), bringing tranquility into our tumultuous lives; and He is our Rock (1 Corinthians 10:4), the immovable and secure base who we can trust to keep us safe and secure in Him.

Brief Summary: Colossians was written explicitly to defeat the heresy that had arisen in Colosse, which endangered the existence of the church. While we do not know what was told to Paul, this letter is his response.

We can surmise based on Paul’s response that he was dealing with a defective view of Christ (denying His real and true humanity and not accepting His full deity). Paul appears also to dispute the “Jewish” emphasis on circumcision and traditions (Colossians 2:8-13; 3:11). The heresy addressed appears to be either a Jewish-Gnosticism or a mix between Jewish asceticism and Greek (Stoic?) philosophy. He does a remarkable job in pointing us to the sufficiency of Christ.

The Book of Colossians contains doctrinal instruction about the deity of Christ and false philosophies (1:15-2:23), as well as practical exhortations regarding Christian conduct, including friends and speech (3:1-4:18).

Connections: As with all the early churches, the issue of Jewish legalism in Colosse was of great concern to Paul. So radical was the concept of salvation by grace apart from works that those steeped in Old Testament law found it very difficult to grasp. Consequently, there was a continual movement among the legalists to add certain requirements from the law to this new faith. Primary among them was the requirement of circumcision which was still practiced among some of the Jewish converts. Paul countered this error in Colossians 2:11-15. in which he declares that circumcision of the flesh was no longer necessary because Christ had come. His was a circumcision of the heart, not the flesh, making the ceremonial rites of the Old Testament law no longer necessary (Deuteronomy 10:1630:6.Jeremiah 4:4.9:26.Acts 7:51Romans 2:29).

Practical Application: Although Paul addresses many areas, the basic application for us today is the total and complete sufficiency of Christ in our lives, both for our salvation and our sanctification. We must know and understand the gospel so as not to be led astray by subtle forms of legalism and heresy. We must be on guard for any deviation that would diminish the centrality of Christ as Lord and Savior. Any “religion” or cult that tries to equate itself with the truth using books that claim the same authority as the Bible, or which combines human effort with divine accomplishment in salvation must be avoided. Other religions cannot be combined with or added to Christianity. Christ gives us absolute standards of moral conduct. Christianity is a family, a way of life, and a relationship—not a religion. Good deeds, astrology, occultism and horoscopes do not show us God’s ways. Only Christ does. His will is revealed in His word, His love letter to us; we must get to know it!

The following ppt. slides are by Lindsay Morton and can be found in his ppt.

We are faced with the same dangers of legalism, philosophies of men, and heresy. The following was taken from blueletterbible.org. https://www.blueletterbible.org/study/eo/Col/Col000.cfm

The answer is the all sufficiency of Christ, His person, HIs work, and HIs wisdom.

  • The danger of relapse into paganism with its gross immorality (cf. Col 1:21-232:6.3:5-11.)
  •       We are facing that with the hedonism of our culture, the drinking, sex, overeating, gluttony, pursuit of pleasure (hedonism), worship of sports, gambling, luxury. This danger is probably greater to most Christians in America b/c of the affluence we enjoy. More Christians fall away from the love of money, the worries, riches, and pleasrues that rob us of bearing the fruit of the Spirit (Luke 8:14) rather than some doctrinal error such as the Colossians faced.
  • The danger of accepting what has been come to known as “The Colossian heresy”. This heresy was a syncretism involving four elements of both pagan and Jewish origin:
  • 1 Philosophies of men – which denied the all sufficiency and pre-eminence of Christ (Col 2:8.)
  •      If Christ is the head of the church, then we should be following his commands, trusting his wisdom on current hot topic issues involved sex. Instead we have the philosophy of men telling us why certain tings are ok. We are surrounded by religious cults and Christian groups that deny the deity of Jesus such as Christian Science and Jehovah’s Witnesses.
  • 2 Judaistic ceremonialism – which attached special significance to the rite of circumcision, food regulations, and observance of special days (Col 2:11.,16-17.). The Judaizers (Jewish Chritians who made keeping the Law as a test of fellowship with the Gentile Christians) followed Paul to every church he established, trying to destroy his teaching and influence.
  •       There are so many groups that want to get us back to keeping the unclean meats laws of the OT, keeping the Jewish feasts, etc. There are many cults that do that such as House of Yahweh. . 
  • 3 Angel worship – which detracted from the uniqueness of Christ (Col 2:18.) From Sam Storms: “Paul warns against the excessive preoccupation with angels and their involvement in human life. He believed that this preoccupation distracted from the centrality of Jesus Christ. The word translated as “worship” could also mean “invoke” or “conjure”. People who worship angels may be soliciting angels to provide protection, blessings, or success.” That happens today also.
  • 4 Asceticism – which called for harsh treatment of the body as the means to control its lusts (Col 2:20-23). “The word asceticism comes from the Greek askesis, which means practice, bodily exercise, or athletic training. Early Christians adopted the word to describe spiritual exercises performed to acquire virtue. ” Asceticism is a practice of self-denial that has been followed by many Christians throughout history. It can be practiced in a variety of ways, including: 
  • Fasting: Early Christians fasted before Easter, and some Christians have fasted periodically or abstained from specific foods and drinks.  
  • Celibacy: Celibacy was considered the first commandment in some ascetic movements, and virgins and celibates were prominent in early Christian communities.  
  • Solitary confinement: Some Christians have lived in solitary confinement in cells, or in deserted tombs or fortresses.  
  • Self-inflicted pain: Some Christians have inflicted pain on themselves as a form of asceticism. In the Phillipines some believers allow themselves to be nailed to a cross.
  • Living in poverty: Saint Francis required his brothers to live among the poor, and the Dominicans took a vow of poverty. 
  • Jesus taught “self denial” but not with the idea that makes someone holier than others or that abstaining from things earns one’s salvation.
image.png

The 2nd section of Colossians is practice exhortatiions that the Colossian Christians should focus on instead of the philosophes of men, the legalism of Jewish asciticism, and the immorality around them.

It is very similar to the practical section of Ephesians (ch 4-6). Just a few slides from the Lindsay Morton ppt.

My suggestion is to simply read Colossians 3 and 4. Too often we get caught up in discussing the different doctrines of the NT. It can become a very intellectual form of Christiantiy.

Ask yourself the following questions as you read these 2 chapters.

1 Is my mind mostly set on spiritual things or earthly things? 3:1-4

2 Are there any sinful deeds or emotions in 3:5-11 that I still struggle to “put off” (i.e. stop)? How hard am I really trying to put these things off?

3 How am I doing “putting on” the new self practices, attitudes, and deeds (3:12-17)? How much am I into the “word dwelling in me”? How thankful am I? How much do I listen to and sing Christian music at church or home? We would be good to read this section every day before we go to work or play.

4 Which of the categories in 3:18-4:1 apply to me (husband, wife, child, parent, boss, worker)? How well am I doing following the specific exhortations for my category? How submissive am I as a wife? How loving am I as a husband? How respectful and obedient am I as a child? How good am I as a father training my children witout provoking them to anger by my hypocrisies that they see and by how I treat them at times? How good am I doing as a loyal hard worker at work? How am I doing treating my workers fairly as a boss?

5 How devoted and consistent am I in my prayer life (4:2-4)? How often do I pray, not just asking for my personal needs and health, but for persecuted Christians worldwide (The Voice of the Martyrs organization constantly sends out info on that) and for the preaching of the gospel in foreign lands (locally also of course)?

6 Do I make wise use of my time, with emphasis on spiritual priorities instead of materialistic or pleasure (4:5-6)? Is my speech always kind and gracious to non Christians, always trying to speak to them as the Holy Spirit would want me to speak?

7 In 4:7-18 Paul mentions many of his co-workers and fellow Christians and commends them for their work with him in the kingdom, mentioning specific things they do and some of their needs. Take the time to make a list of you co-workers in the kingdom and the good things they are doing for Jesus. Pray for them, mentioning their needs to God and thanking God for them. Then send them an email telling them how much you appreciate their work.

EPHESIANS 5:21-6:24 6th walk and “Stand”

6. 5:22-6:9 Walk in submission to one another.

Actually, 5:21 says 21 submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ. So it doesn’t say “walk” but I am making it one of the “walks” of chapters 4-6. 

“Walk in submission to one another” in Ephesians 5:21 means to humbly prioritize the needs and perspectives of others in your relationships, putting aside your own desires and ego, with the understanding that this act of submission is done out of reverence for Christ and to reflect his love in your interactions with others; essentially, it calls for mutual respect and a willingness to yield to one another within a community or relationship. 

We might think this is just a verse for wives to be subject to their husbands, which it does include that, but it would include all our relations with others: husbands and wives, children and parents; slaves and masters. A husband is submitting in a way to his wife when he puts aside his own ego and needs to love and cherish her needs. Etc. 

Christianity should change the way we treat others in all the different relationships in 5:22-6:9. What good is it if a man is a great member of the church but mistreats his wife, or abuses his wife or children, or is a cruel boss to his workers? He might obey all the commands in 4:1-5:21 and yet commit perhaps the worse sin of all in how he treats others. 

This is also tied to being filled with the Spirit. 

6. 5:22-6:9 Walk in submission to one another.

Actually, 5:21 says 21 submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ. So it doesn’t say “walk” but I am making it one of the “walks” of chapters 4-6. 

“Walk in submission to one another” in Ephesians 5:21 means to humbly prioritize the needs and perspectives of others in your relationships, putting aside your own desires and ego, with the understanding that this act of submission is done out of reverence for Christ and to reflect his love in your interactions with others; essentially, it calls for mutual respect and a willingness to yield to one another within a community or relationship. 

We might think this is just a verse for wives to be subject to their husbands, which it does include that, but it would include all our relations with others: husbands and wives, children and parents; slaves and masters. A husband is submitting in a way to his wife when he puts aside his own ego and needs to love and cherish her needs. Etc. 

Christianity should change the way we treat others in all the different relationships in 5:22-6:9. What good is it if a man is a great member of the church but mistreats his wife, or abuses his wife or children, or is a cruel boss to his workers? He might obey all the commands in 4:1-5:21 and yet commit perhaps the worse sin of all in how he treats others. 

This is also tied to being filled with the Spirit. 

6. 5:22-6:9 Walk in submission to one another.

Actually, 5:21 says 21 submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ. So it doesn’t say “walk” but I am making it one of the “walks” of chapters 4-6. 

“Walk in submission to one another” in Ephesians 5:21 means to humbly prioritize the needs and perspectives of others in your relationships, putting aside your own desires and ego, with the understanding that this act of submission is done out of reverence for Christ and to reflect his love in your interactions with others; essentially, it calls for mutual respect and a willingness to yield to one another within a community or relationship. 

We might think this is just a verse for wives to be subject to their husbands, which it does include that, but it would include all our relations with others: husbands and wives, children and parents; slaves and masters. A husband is submitting in a way to his wife when he puts aside his own ego and needs to love and cherish her needs. Etc. 

Christianity should change the way we treat others in all the different relationships in 5:22-6:9. What good is it if a man is a great member of the church but mistreats his wife, or abuses his wife or children, or is a cruel boss to his workers? He might obey all the commands in 4:1-5:21 and yet commit perhaps the worse sin of all in how he treats others. 

This is also tied to being filled with the Spirit where Paul ended the 5th walk as wise men.

  1. 5:22-33 Husbands and wives


A. 5:22-33 Husbands and wives

These images are from saralandchristians.com

4:20 The husband is to nourish (supply her needs)and cherish (thalli, to keep warm, warm someone up, revive their health, by nourishing. Used in 1 Thess 2:7 of a nursing mother cherishing (cares for) her children). 

Q: Do most husbands even know what their wives needs are or care if he is really supplying those needs? 

Q: Do most husbands show their wives how much they cherish them? “Cherish is the word that I use to describe …” song by the Association. 

Q: What would you say are a wife’s main needs?

Q: Under what circumstances would a wife not have to be in submission to her husband? If he beat her? If he verbally abused her? If he lied to her? If he didn’t support her financially? If he was a drunk? 

B) 6:1-4 Children and parents

Also from saralandchristians.com

Q: Is there ever a time when children do not have to obey their parents?

What if the parents won’t let them be baptized or go to church with their friends?

Q: What are some ways that fathers might exasperate their children and provoke them to anger?

Why are only fathers mentioned here and not mothers?

If you have children, do you remember times when you probably provoked your children to anger or disobedience because of the way you disciplined them? 

C) 6:5-9 Bondservants and masters 

Q: Does it surprise you that neither Jesus nor the apostles tried to do away with slavery? 

How did the Christians in the northern and southern churches handle the slavery issue around the time of the Civil War?

Do you think that a Christian master would voluntarily free his slave once he becomes a Christian?

We will study Philemon later where Paul tells Philemon to receive back kindly his runaway slave who had become a Christian while Paul was in Roman prison. Paul did not tell him to free Onesiphorus.  

7. 6:10-20 Stand with the armor of God against the schemes of the devil

So far it has been about our “walk” and conduct. But if you are out walking and someone attacks you, then you have to keep walking to get to your goal but you need to defend yourself with a weapon like a gun or a knife, etc. 

The Christian walk is the same way. The devil had devious schemes to deceive Christians and many different ways of attacking Christians to get them to sin and fall from grace.

Thus the need for the “whole armor of God”. You can’t fight on your own. You need the strength of God and His armor. 

Q: After reading all the individual parts of the armor and what they do, which one do you need the most?

Q: 6:18 8 praying at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication. To that end, keep alert with all perseverance.

How often do you pray for God to help you fight the devi, to not give in to temptation?

6:21-24 FINAL GREETINGS

Paul sent Tychicus to see how they were doing.

Tychicus is mentioned five times in the New Testament:

  • Acts 20:4: Tychicus is mentioned alongside Trophimus 
  • Ephesians 6:21–22: Paul sends Tychicus to the Ephesians to tell them about his circumstances and encourage them 
  • Colossians 4:7–9: Paul sends Tychicus to the Colossians to tell them about his circumstances and encourage them 
  • Titus 3:12: Paul considers sending Tychicus to Crete to assist Titus 
    2 Timothy 4:12: Paul sends Tychicus to Ephesus. Tychicus was an Asiatic Christian who accompanied Paul on part of his journey from Macedonia to Jerusalem. Paul trusted Tychicus and referred to him as a “dear brother” and “faithful servant”. 
  • The Catholic Church calls Tychicus St. Tychicus, and his feast day is April 29. Church tradition holds that he was martyred for his faith in Colophon, which is 24 miles from Ephesus. 

EPHESIANS 5:3- The 4th and 5th walks

4. 5:3-14 Walk as children of light, no longer in darkness

These are the really bad things that characterize those who are walking in spiritual darkness. 

Again from gotquestions.org

Spiritual darkness is the state of a person who is living apart from God. The Old Testament book of Isaiah, in prophesying of the Messiah, speaks of a deep spiritual darkness that enveloped the people: “The people walking in darkness have seen a great light; on those living in the land of deep darkness a light has dawned” (Isaiah 9:2). This passage reappears in the New Testament, in Matthew 4:16, to announce that those who have come to know the God of Israel through His Son Jesus Christ are the ones who have been delivered from spiritual darkness and now walk in the light of God’s life.

The apostle John taught that God is light: “This is the message we heard from Jesus and now declare to you: God is light, and there is no darkness in him at all. So we are lying if we say we have fellowship with God but go on living in spiritual darkness; we are not practicing the truth” (1 John 1:5–6, NLT). And Jesus declared that He is the light of the world: “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life” (John 8:12).

Thus, spiritual darkness means not having fellowship with God through a relationship with Jesus Christ. The darkness of separation from God is overcome through Christ: “In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it” (John 1:4–5).

From the moment Adam and Eve sinned, humans have lived in a fallen world. All people are born in a fallen state of sin and separation from God. Until a person is reborn of God’s Spirit, he or she lives in spiritual darkness. Sin darkens our understanding and destroys our spiritual sight, cloaking us in deep darkness: “But the way of the wicked is like deep darkness; they do not know what makes them stumble” (Proverbs 4:19). Moses compares this state of sin and disobedience to groping about like “a blind person in the dark” (Deuteronomy 28:29). One of Job’s friends speaks of those who are lost in spiritual darkness: “Darkness comes upon them in the daytime; at noon they grope as in the night” (Job 5:14).

Living in rebellion to God and His will is equivalent to living in spiritual darkness. When the Lord commissioned Paul, He said, “I am sending you to the Gentiles to open their eyes, so they may turn from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God. Then they will receive forgiveness for their sins and be given a place among God’s people, who are set apart by faith in me” (Acts 26:17–18, NLT).

After salvation, believers become beacons of the spiritual light of Christ: “For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light” (Ephesians 5:8). Those who are in Jesus Christ have been rescued from the kingdom of darkness: “He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son” (Colossians 1:13, ESV). Those who reject Jesus Christ face eternal separation from God in “blackest darkness” (Jude 1:4–13).

In Judaism, a person’s inner character and moral quality are understood to be reflected through the eyes. In Matthew 6:22–23, Jesus compares the moral condition of an unregenerate soul to darkness: “The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are healthy, your whole body will be full of light. But if your eyes are unhealthy, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that darkness!” Jesus’ listeners would have understood that a healthy eye is one that lets in light just as a healthy regenerated heart lets in spiritual light. But a sick or sinful eye (or heart) shuts out light, leaving the soul in spiritual darkness.

The apostle Paul describes those in a sinful state before knowing Christ as possessing a darkened, closed mind and a hardened heart: “Their minds are full of darkness; they wander far from the life God gives because they have closed their minds and hardened their hearts against him” (Ephesians 4:18, NLT).

Unbelievers live in spiritual darkness because Satan, the god of this world, has blinded their minds. They cannot see the glorious light of the gospel: “Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don’t believe. They are unable to see the glorious light of the Good News. They don’t understand this message about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God” (2 Corinthians 4:4, NLT).

Note: Many of the images below are from Micky Galloway ppt. which is on the internet so I assume I can use them.


Spiritual darkness refers to all that is in opposition to the light of God’s love in Christ. The good news that Jesus brings to this world is that His light—His life-giving Spirit—floods light and life into the spiritual darkness of the sinner’s heart. The One who opened the eyes of the blind can also bring us out of spiritual darkness. No matter how deep the darkness, the light of God’s love and truth overcomes every sin that separates us from God.

Q: 5:3,5 The two main sins of the darkness are sexual immorality and greed (covetousness). “Filthiness, foolish talk, and crude jesting” are probably connected to those two main sins. 

Would you say that our society today is characterized by 1)sexual immorality (4202 porneía (the root of the English terms “pornography, pornographic”; cf. 4205 /pórnos) which is derived from pernaō, “to sell off”) – properly, a selling off (surrendering) of sexual purity; promiscuity of any (every) type which would include fornication, adultery, homosexuality) and 

2) greed (4124 pleoneksía (a feminine noun derived from 4119 /pleíōn, “numerically more” and 2192 /éxō, “have”) – properly, the desire for more (things), i.e. lusting for a greater number of temporal things that go beyond what God determines is eternally best (beyond His preferred-will, cf. 2307 /thélēma); covetousness (coveting).

Q: What factors contribute to such a sexual immoral society that we have?

(Personal question to ask yourself): How hard is it to resist sexually immoral thoughts and deeds? How hard is it to to resist lust? What if, like Garfield, all our thoughts were put up in words above us all day? God sees those thoughts even if others can’t.  

Q: What factors contribute to such a greedy, materialistic society that we have? 

Jesus said, “Beware of all kinds of greed” (Luke 12:15) in the parable of the rich man building bigger barns. So are there different kinds of greed? Yes, “desire for more” material things, power, control, status, attention, recognition, even time. 

Q: We all are blessed materially. When does a healthy desire for more in life become greed?

(Personal question to ask yourself): Am I content with what I have or always thinking about how to get more? Contentment is the key to overcoming greed.

Hebrews 13:Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous. Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have, for he has said, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.” So we can confidently say,

“The Lord is my helper;
    I will not fear;
what can man do to me?”

Philippians 4:11 Not that I am speaking of being in need, for I have learned in whatever situation I am to be content. 12 I know how to be brought low, and I know how to abound. In any and every circumstance, I have learned the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need. 13 I can do all things through him who strengthens me.

Q: Paul says to not only don’t participate in them but to “expose the deeds of darkness”. How can we do that without becoming judgmental or self righteous? 


5. 5:15-21 Walk not as unwise men but as wise men

Q: What does “make the best use of your time for the days are evil” (4:16) mean? Is that just talking about time management for all your daily tasks (although that is wise)? 

In Ephesians 5:15, “make the best use of your time” means to be intentional and careful about how you spend your time, prioritizing activities that align with God’s will and serve others, rather than wasting time on worldly pursuits, especially considering that “the days are evil” (meaning the world is not aligned with God’s values)

Jesus said in John 9:We must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming, when no one can work. 

1 Peter 4:so as to live for the rest of the time in the flesh no longer for human passions but for the will of God. For the time that is past suffices for doing what the Gentiles want to do, living in sensuality, passions, drunkenness, orgies, drinking parties, and lawless idolatry. With respect to this they are surprised when you do not join them in the same flood of debauchery, and they malign you; but they will give account to him who is ready to judge the living and the dead. 

Q: 4:18 Don’t be drunk with wine, but be filled with the Spirit. 

How big of a problem is drinking in our society? 

Without naming names, think of all the Christians you know who have ruined their lives with drinking.

Drinking is considered a significant problem in society, as excessive alcohol use is a leading preventable cause of death, contributing to a substantial number of deaths each year, and also causing significant health, social, and economic issues, including accidents, violence, family problems, and workplace disruptions; making it a major public health concern both in the United States and globally.

Key points about the scale of the drinking problem:

  • High mortality rate:
    Excessive alcohol use is linked to a large number of deaths annually, ranking it among the leading preventable causes of death. 
  • Economic impact:
    Alcohol misuse incurs significant costs due to healthcare expenses, lost productivity, and legal issues associated with alcohol-related incidents. 
  • Prevalence of alcohol use disorder (AUD):
    Millions of people in the US are diagnosed with AUD, indicating a substantial population struggling with problematic drinking habits. 
  • Social consequences:
    Alcohol abuse can lead to family dysfunction, relationship problems, and increased risk of violence. 
  • Global concern:
    Excessive alcohol consumption is recognized as a major public health issue worldwide. 

Q: Why do people drink so much (moderate drinking is not forbidden in the Bible)? 

Why is it such a problem on college campuses?

Why do even many Christians ruin their lives with drinking? 

Q: What does it mean to be filled with the Spirit (4:18)? Miraculous? 

Q: 4:19 Being filled with the Spirit leads to singing psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in our hearts to the Lord, teaching and admonishing one another (Colossians 3:16).

What is the difference between psalms, hymns, spiritual songs? 

Do you enjoy singing to the Lord? 

Does such singing uplift you and edify you? 

What if we could all sing like Vincent?

Does it matter how good you sing? Make a joyful “noise” (Psalm 100)

How important is Christian music to you and others?

Does making melody in our hearts mean you can’t make melody with instruments along with the singing? 

    psalmos: a striking (of musical strings), a psalm.    5568 psalmós – a psalm (“Scripture set to music”). Originally, a psalm (5568 /psalmós) was sung and accompanied by a plucked musical instrument (typically a harp), especially the OT Psalms.

Regardless of one’s view of the use of instruments in worship, is that issue a heaven/hell issue?

Would it be good to add instruments to our worship, or would it be divisive? It seems that it would cause many to either violate their conscience and sing or to leave. 

Is there a workable solution if many of the congregation would like to have some instrumental worship? 

Does contemporary Christian music mean a lot to you? 

What are some of the dangers of using instruments in worship? 

Q: Tied to being filled with the Spirit is giving thanks to God the father and to our Lord Jesus Christ “always and for everything” (4:20). 

How often do you thank God each day?

How often do you tell others thank you (probably we do that more than we thank God as we tend to take God for granted). 

1 THESSALONIANS 5:16-18Rejoice always, pray continually, give thanks in all circumstances; for this is God’s will for you in Christ Jesus.

PSALM 103:1-4Praise the LORD, my soul; all my inmost being, praise His holy name. Praise the LORD, my soul, and forget not all His benefits — who forgives all your sins and heals all your diseases, who redeems your life from the pit and crowns you with love and compassion.

PSALM 95:1-5 (NKJV)Oh come, let us sing to the LORD! Let us shout joyfully to the Rock of our salvation. Let us come before His presence with thanksgiving; let us shout joyfully to Him with psalms. For the LORD is the great God, and the great King above all gods. In His hand are the deep places of the earth’ the heights of the hills are His also. The sea is His, for He made it; and His hands formed the dry land.

PHILIPPIANS 4:4-7Rejoice in the Lord always. I will say it again: Rejoice! Let your gentleness be evident to all. The Lord is near. Do not be anxious about anything, but in every situation, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.

COLOSSIANS 3:15-17Let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, since as members of one body you were called to peace. And be thankful. Let the message of Christ dwell among you richly as you teach and admonish one another with all wisdom through psalms, hymns, and songs from the Spirit, singing to God with gratitude in your hearts. And whatever you do, whether in word or deed, do it all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him.

EPHESIANS 4:1-5:2 The 2nd and 3rd “walks”

There were 6 “walks” in Eph 4-6. This referred to the way Christians were to live and act as a result of their special calling into the one body (the doctrinal section in Eph 1-3).

2. 4: 17-32 Walk no longer as the Gentiles

Paul had just talked about the church “maturing” (Eph 4:13), and now he describes what a mature church would look like.

4:25-32 But what does that mean to put off the old self and put on the new self. Let’s get specific on what to put off and what to put on.

4:30 A key verse in the midst of this. 30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption. The Holy Spirit is constantly working to help us (through the written word and other ways) to do all this. Just like parents are constantly trying to instill these life principles in their children and it grieves them when their children do wrong and don’t do right. It grieves the Holy Spirit when we don’t. 

Q: Which one (or ones!) of these do you struggle with the most to put away the bad and do the right? 

Q: The “Gentiles” would be the non-Christians around us. Are the non-Christians today really as bad as Paul described them to be? 

Are we really different than them? Do we need to be different like the Amish? Can we be “in the world but not of the world”? John 17:14 I have given them your word, and the world has hated them because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. 15 I do not ask that you take them out of the world, but that you keep them from the evil one. 16 They are not of the world, just as I am not of the world.

Would your friends and co-workers say that you are different? How could they tell a difference?

3. 5:1-2 Walk in love as Christ loved us and gave himself for us

This is from got questions.org 

The “walk” of Ephesians 5:2 refers to our behavior and how we act. We walk in love when we act like God. When we behave like Jesus, we are walking in love. Just as children like to imitate their parents, we are to mimic God in the same way Jesus copied His Father’s behavior.

The Greek word translated as “love” in this passage is agapeAgape is sacrificial, unselfish, unconditional love that proves itself through actions. It perfectly describes God’s love for us (John 3:16) and Christ’s love for us (1 John 3:16). With agape, “God showed how much he loved us by sending his one and only Son into the world so that we might have eternal life through him” (1 John 4:9, NLT). When the Bible says, “God is love” in 1 John 4:8, the word “love” is a translation of agape. God’s nature, His essence, is selfless, sacrificial, unconditional love.

The apostle John stressed that, since God loves us sacrificially and unconditionally, we ought to love others in the same way: “Dear friends, since God so loved us, we also ought to love one another” (1 John 4:11). Again, we walk in love by imitating God’s love for us in how we show love to others. Jesus taught the same principle when He said, “There is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for one’s friends” (John 15:13, NLT).

The apostle Paul gives a detailed description of how to walk in love: “Love is patient and kind. Love is not jealous or boastful or proud or rude. It does not demand its own way. It is not irritable, and it keeps no record of being wronged. It does not rejoice about injustice but rejoices whenever the truth wins out. Love never gives up, never loses faith, is always hopeful, and endures through every circumstance” (1 Corinthians 13:4–7, NLT). The greatest virtue we can nurture in our Christian walk is agape love (1 Corinthians 13:13).

In Ephesians 5:2, Paul said that Jesus “gave himself up for us.” Giving ourselves up means offering our lives to God in sacrifice. It means following, obeying, submitting, serving, and living in a committed relationship with Him. Giving ourselves up means walking in love. When we behave like this, our lives become “a fragrant offering” that is pleasing to God and everyone who encounters the scent (Leviticus 1:173:16). Paul urged believers to offer themselves “as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God—this is your true and proper worship” (Romans 12:1).

When we walk in love, we show the world that we are true followers of Jesus Christ: “Your love for one another will prove to the world that you are my disciples” (John 13:35, NLT; see also 1 John 3:14).

As God’s children and members of His family, we are called to deny our own selfish desires and interests for the sake of God and others. Although we are free in Christ, we use our freedom “to serve one another in love. For the whole law can be summed up in this one command: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’” (Galatians 5:13–14, NLT). Peter said, “You were cleansed from your sins when you obeyed the truth, so now you must show sincere love to each other as brothers and sisters. Love each other deeply with all your heart” (1 Peter 1:22, NLT). This wholehearted, sacrificial imitation of God’s divine agape is what it means to walk in love.

Q: Would you friends, family, co-workers, people you do business with say that you are a loving Christian, that they see the love of God and of Jesus in you?

Of course there are different ways of expressing love?

Q: Which of these is your primary way of expressing love?

EPHESIANS 4:1-16

4:CH 4-6 THE PRACTICAL SECTION

Having given 3 fairly deep doctrinal chapters, Paul goes on in the last 3 chapters to give day to day practical commands for living the life of one who has been saved and added to this church body of believers of all different backgrounds.

A key word is “walk”, used figuratively of how you move about as a Christian day to day, how you conduct yourself. There are 6 walks found in Eph 4-6. Let’s examine the first.

  1. 4:1-16 Walk in a manner worthy of your calling in the “unity of the faith” (which includes both dotrinal unity and love unity)

    Q: Does God call us to become Christians? How? Do you consider your conversion to be a calling of God? Does God call people by some voice or thought that He puts in your head? We probably have different opinions on that, but one thing for certain is that he calls us “through the gospel”. The good news of salvatiion by grace through Christ’s death for us is the drawing power.

    2 Thessalonians 2:13 But we ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers beloved by the Lord, because God chose you as the firstfruits to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth. 14 To this he called you through our gospel, so that you may obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.


     In ch 2 and 3 Paul gave the doctrine of the mystery of uniting Jew and Gentile believers into the one church body. But that brings together believers from two totally different backgrounds. Just as in the church today, we have many different backgrounds and personalities. It is one thing to say that we are united in one body, but it is another thing to say that we love and tolerate one another in love when we have conflicts and differences. 

    Q: 4:1-3 gives the qualities necessary for us to really have “unity” in the church. Which of these is the most important in your opinion? Which one do you struggle with practicing?

    Paul then goes on to give the 7 doctrinal truths that are necessary to have “unity”. Hindus could have all the qualities in 4:1-3 and be united as Hindus, but that would not be unity in Christ. There are 7 basic doctrines and beliefs that we must have to really have Christian unity.

    This list excludes those who believe in other gods than Yahweh and other Lords than Yeshua (Jesus). The one baptism is water baptism for the remission of sins (as opposed to the baptism of the Holy Spirit or of fire as some teach). There is one body, which is the church, which is believers all over the world.

    Q: How exclusive is this list among those who have the one faith but are in many different denominations? It is exclusive, but some of the 7 doctrines could be interpreted differently.

    Q: Does the one baptism have to be for exactly the right reason (i.e. the remission of sins) in the right manner (immersion)? Can it be sprinkling or pouring? Does that really matter? Can it be baby baptism? Why can’t we unite of what the “on baptism” of unity is?

    Q: Does the “one body” include all the denominations who have many different names and beliefs but basically hold to these 7 doctrines? The church I was raised in taught that the different man made denominations could not be part of the “one body”, but I disagree with that. The one body is simply those saved by grace throug faith even though they are in different denominations. Unity of those denominations would be great, but not essential for salvation. The founders of the Churches of Christ, Stone and Campbell, sought to get believers from all denominations to put away their denominational names and creeds and just be united as Christians, but they did not say that those believers in those denominations were not Christians.

    But what about the denominations that are going LGBQT? Are they still part of the one body?

    The “one hope” is that of eternal life. But there are many views on eschatology (amillinealism, ? Do we all have to believe the same on eschatology? Add preterism to the chart below.

    4:8 Jesus gave miraculous “gifts” to certain men in the early church to give the doctrinal truths necessary for unity. He “ascended” to heaven to pour out those gifts on men.

    Act 2:33 Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this that you yourselves are seeing and hearing.

    This would include the 5 miraculously gifted leadership positions (apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers) as well as the miraculous gifts given to members of the church (1 Cor 12). Thus in 4:16 “every joint” helped maintain unity in the body. 

    These 5 gifted positions were to equip the saints for ministry, to build up the body, to a mature unity of faith and knowledge, to not be tossed about by deceitful doctrines, to speak the truth in love. 

    Jesus prayed for this “unity of the faith” in John 17:20 “I do not ask for these only, but also for those who will believe in me through their word, 21 that they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 The glory that you have given me I have given to them, that they may be one even as we are one, 23 I in them and you in me, that they may become perfectly one, so that the world may know that you sent me and loved them even as you loved me. 

    This is Jesus’ prayer on the night before he is crucified the next day. It would be like me knowing that I will die tomorrow and the night before I pray that my 3 children will always be united and love and help each other after I die.

    Q: As a result of these gifted 1st century positions, do we have all that we need for Christian unity and “maturity” in the church? If we have all that we need doctrinally for unity, then why. do we have so many different denominations teaching so many different doctrines? I might teach my 3 children all that they need to become mature adults, but that doesn’t mean they will become mature adults.

    What would be examples of “deceitful doctrines” that stray from that unity? This sounds more devious than just differences of interpretation on issues and doctrines that are not heaven or hell issues, such as those given by Paul in Romans 14 (eating of meats, observing of days, etc.). Deceitful doctrines sounds like doctrines taught by devious people trying to lure and pull believers away from the one body, maybe their motivation is power or sex or money.

    Peter spoke of such false prophets in 2 Peter 2:But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. And many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed. And in their greed they will exploit you with false words. Their condemnation from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep.

    Q: What are some doctrines that are not heaven or hell doctrines? Maybe instrumental music in worship, frequency of taking the Lord’s Supper, names and organization of churches, etc. We should not make any doctrine a heaven or hell doctrine unless the scriptures specifically do so. If we make almost every doctrine a heaven or hell one, then we will end up in untold division, as some groups have found out.

    Q: So what are the doctrines are heaven or hell essential doctrines to the “unity of the faith”?

    The list of 7 doctrines in this chapter is where we start, but even then the “one baptism” can be interpreted differently. Certainly the one faith would include the belief that Jesus is the Son of God whose death is the only way to be saved. That would rule out all the cults who deny the deity of Jesus.

    There are certain sins that Paul says in Galatians 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20 idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, 21 envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. The Bible teaches that homosexuality is a sin, but the LGBQT issue has divided churches and believers, but there can be no compromise on that. Sometimes unity is not possible if some refuse to acknowledge the inspiration of Scripture and won’t allow the Bible to define what is right and wrong.

    Q: Do we still need and have those gifted leaders today? 

    Apostles (the Mormon church has 12 apostles)? Paul spoke of false apostles: Paul spoke of “false apostes”: For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ. And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works (2 Corinthians 11:13-15).

    Prophets (many churches claim to have prophets)? What about all the prophets of all the cults? The Mormons have Joseph Smith as their prophet, the Seventh Day Adventists have Ellen G. White, the Jehhovah’s Witnesses have Rutherford and Russell, Christian Science have Mary Baker Eddy, and countless more examples. These false prophets have no miraculous confirmation that they are a prophet and no predicting of the future to confirm that they are prophets. They also add to the “all truth” that was given to the original apostles without any proof that Jesus is allowing them to do that.

    Evangelists (are our preachers really evangelists?) In the early church, evangelists were gifted men who moved around preaching the gospel, establishing churches, grounding churches in the truth as Paul left Timothy in Ephesus to do (1 Timothy 1:As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus so that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine) or as Paul left Titus in Crete to do (Titus 1:This is why I left you in Crete, so that you might put what remained into order, and appoint elders in every town as I directed you—). It was not a permanent paid position such as the paid clergy position that we have invented in churches today. The church did provide food and a place to stay for the evangelists who came to them. The Didache (a first century document) warns “You should treat apostles and prophets as the Gospel commands. Receive every apostle that comes to you as you would the Lord. But he must not stay more than one day, or two if necessary: but if he stays three days, he is a false prophet.” In other words, he must be preaching for the money! There were gifted elders and teachers to lead the church, so a permanent paid evangelists were not needed or authorized. We don’t have miraculously gifted elders or teachers today, but we still have many good elders and teachers in our churches. Why do we spend so much money of permanent paid pastors and preachers?

    I can see how evangelists who do mission work to establish churches might need to be supported (as my family was doing mission work in Trinidad and Colombia), but even then that was not a permanent position. It is interesting that the Moravians sent out many missionaries all over the world (I encourage you to read about their history). They taught them a trade so they could support themselve in the foreign country they worked in, gave them money to get there, but did not support them as they lived there!

    Pastors (i.e. elders; are our elders today gifted?): The word for shepherd is poimainó: to act as a shepherd. [4165 /poimaínō (“to shepherd, tend”) occurs 11 times in the NT, usually with a figurative sense of “shepherding (tending) God’s flock.” This provides Spirit-directed guidance (care) conjunction with feeding His people (teaching them Scripture).] This is the word Paul used in Acts 20 when telling the elders (4245 presbýteros – properly, a mature man having seasoned judgment (experience); an elder.) whom God had made to be overseers (episkopos: a superintendent, an overseer: this is the word used of elders in 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 14166 poimḗn – properly, a shepherd (“pastor” in Latin); (figuratively) someone who the Lord raises up to care for the total well-being of His flock (the people of the Lord).) to “shepherd (Pastors (i.e. elders; are our elders today gifted?): The word for shepherd is poimainó: to act as a shepherd. [4165 /poimaínō (“to shepherd, tend”) occurs 11 times in the NT, usually with a figurative sense of “shepherding (tending) God’s flock.” This provides Spirit-directed guidance (care) conjunction with feeding His people (teaching them Scripture).] This is the word Paul used in Acts 20 when telling the elders (4245 presbýteros – properly, a mature man having seasoned judgment (experience); an elder.) whom God had made to be overseers (episkopos: a superintendent, an overseer: this is the word used of elders in 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1) to shepherd (4166 poimḗn – properly, a shepherd (“pastor” in Latin); (figuratively) someone who the Lord raises up to care for the total well-being of His flock (the people of the Lord) the flock. In other words, the 3 Greek words in Acts 20 refer to the same position: elders( presbyteros from which we get presbyters), overseers (episkopos from which we get bishops), shepherds (poimen from which we get pastors and shepherds). The early church organization at the local level was “elders and deacons”. Philippians 1:1: Paul wrote to the “overseers and deacons” in Philippi.1 Timothy 3: Paul lists qualifications for elders and deacons, including that elders should be experienced Christians with good reputations and well-ordered families. Titus 1: Paul refers to elders and overseers as the same. Acts 20:28: Paul spoke to the elders in Ephesus and told them to be overseers of the church. 1 Peter 5: Paul uses language of elders both shepherding and overseeing. In Christianity, the roles of presbyters and bishops have varied across time and denomination, often as 2 different positions, but the words refer to one position, that of elders.

    Bottom line, the gifted “pastors” in Eph 4:11 were shepherds or elders, not preachers like the term is used for preachers in denominations today. They were appointed in churches even soon after they were established. Paul on his 1st missionary journey: Acts 14:21 When they had preached the gospel to that city and had made many disciples, they returned to Lystra and to Iconium and to Antioch, 22 strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith, and saying that through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God. 23 And when they had appointed elders for them in every church, with prayer and fasting they committed them to the Lord in whom they had believed. So Paul appointed elders in those local congregations very soon after he established those churches. Those elders would have met the qualifications for elders in 1 Tim 3, but they would have needed the miraculous gifts to enable them to guide and protect the flock from false teachers. I believe all the first century elders had miraculous gifts, just as Eph 4:11 claims.

    We do not have miraculously gifted elders today, so do we still need elders? I think so. They just need to realize their limitations since they are not miraculously gifted. Of course, they can still protect the flock from heresy without being gifted by using the “all truth” in the Word, and they can still lovingly shepherd and care for the flock. They need to be careful about forcing their “opinions” on the flock.  

    Teachers : According to Ephesians 4:11, “pastors and teachers” are listed together, but whether they represent one single position or two distinct gifts is a matter of debate among scholars; some interpret it as meaning that all pastors should be teachers, but not all teachers are necessarily pastors, suggesting a distinction between the roles even if they are closely related. One of the qualifications for an overseer or elder was “apt to teach” (1 Timothy 3:1The saying is trustworthy: If anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task. Therefore an overseermust be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach… Of the elders that Paul told Titus to appoint in Crete: Titus 1:He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it. So, elders did teach in the churches, but in Eph 4:11 the “teachers” probably referred to a different position from elders. There were miraculously gifted teachers in the early church. 1 Cor 12:27 Now you are the body of Christ and individually members of it. 28 And God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, helping, administrating, and various kinds of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? 30 Do all possess gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? 31 But earnestly desire the higher gifts.It is interesting that Paul list the top 3 gifted positions in the church at Corinth as apostles, prophets, and teachers. It is also interesting that he does not include the miraculously gifted positions of elders or evangelists. Evangelists traveled church to church, so I can see why they were not included, but were there not miraculously gifted elders in the church at Corinth. I found this on the internet:”No, elders do not appear in any Biblical accounts of the church at Corinth. The church at Corinth lacked the spiritual maturity that would have been necessary for elders to be present. The church was made up of people with a history of immoral lifestyles, including sexual immorality, idolatry, and adultery. There was also evidence that many Corinthian disciples were former members of pagan mystery cults.” But then I found this. “For example, there is nothing said in the New Testament of the Eldership in Corinth, yet the epistle of the church in Rome to the church in Corinth commonly called the epistle of Clement, written about the close of the first century, proves that there was a plurality of Elders in Corinth.” Maybe the church added elders after Paul’s death as the miraculous gifts ceased to exist?

    Do we need teachers today in churches, even if they are not miraculously inspired? I think so. They just need to be grounded in the Word.